Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Vintage Magazines' started by blueorchid, Aug 3, 2010.
Oops I forgot to put that it was shot by Max Abadian.
It is because the name doutzen kroes is standing on the cover other ways i would not have seen it was doutzen !! Im a huge fan, but i hate when they do to much photoshop. It is going to be cover 51 of doutzen kroes i have
nice cover, but what they done to her face?
$2.99? It's nice to see a magazine not upping their prices like crazy.
Anyways, I quite like the cover. It's not great, but it looks nice and clean and there's a blonde bombshell on the cover. haha
Big issue, big cleavage.
But such soft styling.
Cover is nice, but they say bombshell is back, if they say it about her and not just about that type of woman, where she was?
I think it sounds weird, now when she is pregnant and will not work as often as she did last days imo.
They could write this on the cover after her baby is born.
I think the cover means that the bombshell look is back not that Doutzen is back, she's mentioned seperately on the bottom right.
Nice cover, but reminds me of Gwyneth Palrow's August Vogue cover. Too much retouching!
nice cover, but too many cleavage...and her breast look so big on the cover
I like the cover, she's beautiful but...they should've put her name in bolder letters at the top, i didnt even see it at the bottom until blueorchid mentioned it......
Nice pose, but it's hard to recognise her on the cover. Damn photoshop!
She looks beautiful!
I really like the cover and the preview picture, Doutzen's expression on the cover is a tad vapid, but that is a minor minus with the overall being a big plus.
That's the beautiful cover. Doutzen looks stunning.
I love this cover. Doutzen looks great.
Wow so lucky.
The cover is okay. Less photoshop and would look great.
she is looking so beautiful, she is really shining, so i appreciate that cover!! Also like the dress (Prada right...)