dizzytacks
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2005
- Messages
- 1,774
- Reaction score
- 0
floundering already...
i think a lot of people wanted/ expected this. but he would have been CRUCIFIED if he did. i guess its one of thoes your damned if you do (give 'em studio 54), damned if u dont (simple pre studio 54 halston).Yes, I was hoping (and assuming) that's what we were going to get, too.![]()
Too much cameltoe and fug.Did Rachel Zoe really make this?



i am predicting that these are the two dresses that net-a-porter will put for sale tomorrow...
...
![]()
I feel it's quite a literal interpretation of Halston. Like the highwaisted orange pantsI don't think it's bad by any means but it just doesn't have that edge that Halston had

i have to admit that when i read this i went back to look for the cameltoe.
there are a few nice pieces but overall, its not my style.
i think a lot of people wanted/ expected this. but he would have been CRUCIFIED if he did. i guess its one of thoes your damned if you do (give 'em studio 54), damned if u dont (simple pre studio 54 halston).



Well, it's nothing like I was expecting. I know it would have been cliche to do the glamour thing, but I think that's what most NY fashion is truly lacking, edgy, sleek, sophistication and a healthy dose of sensuality. This is in the same vein as Jil Sander and Calvin Klein, except they both have those details that make it desirable and original.
This isn't bad, but it's kind of boring. The colors aren't really helping it either, it's either those muddy shades of taupe or super saturated 70's colors. It was a golden opportunity, a star making kind of moment, but it fell flat.
In trying to avoid being literal or overly referential, he kind of sacrificed the joy and appeal of it all.
There are beautiful pieces to be found, but I was hoping for much more.