Harper's Bazaar Australia January 2010 : Victoria Beckham by Alexi Lubomirski

Discussion in 'Magazines' started by birdyandme, Dec 4, 2009.

View Users: View Users
  1. birdyandme

    birdyandme Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,051
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG]
    My scan of Subscriber's cover.

    Even though it's a reprint I don't mind it. We usually get US reprints.
     
    #1 birdyandme, Dec 4, 2009
    Last edited by moderator imagine14: Dec 4, 2009
  2. duynk88

    duynk88 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    282
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's a Don't
     
  3. duynk88

    duynk88 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    282
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nice Picture but I don't like the shadow of HB's Logo and the text "Victoria"
     
  4. matheus_s

    matheus_s Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2007
    Messages:
    1,622
    Likes Received:
    3
    ARGH! noo..
     
  5. Breathless

    Breathless Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    748
    Likes Received:
    0
    what is she promoting?
     
  6. MON

    MON Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2009
    Messages:
    9,918
    Likes Received:
    244
    Don't like the colors but I like the NEW GLAMOUR font
     
  7. jackie_oh

    jackie_oh New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Messages:
    2,996
    Likes Received:
    0
    that colour is the opposite of glamour...
     
  8. vogue28

    vogue28 Mod Squad Team Leader

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Messages:
    21,715
    Likes Received:
    349
    Does Victoria Beckham need to promote anything just to get a cover? She gets covers just for who she is.
    But maybe she's promoting her collection of dresses.

    Nice subscriber cover, but the 'Victoria' text is to close to the masthead.
     
  9. MarionasMuse

    MarionasMuse New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2009
    Messages:
    870
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is this for real?Looks like a total fake and a fan made...so unprofessional...!And i`m exhausted of that freak Victoria.
     
  10. gb_32

    gb_32 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    1,185
    Likes Received:
    0
    wtf?? it looks like some [email protected] cover done with any random program to edit pictures.
    thanx for scan. i love vb.
     
  11. sethii

    sethii New Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    19,458
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bad mix of fonts ruin a perfectly good image which could have stood alone with minimal text :rolleyes:
     
  12. mercyminx

    mercyminx Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2009
    Messages:
    258
    Likes Received:
    2
    A disastrous reuse of the very beautiful cover shot for the December issue of Bazaar UK. The original cover was stunning. What a shame.
     
  13. Carla-A

    Carla-A starving hysterical naked

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2009
    Messages:
    7,938
    Likes Received:
    1
    Reprints are not very interesting imo. I don't really understand what's the goal of reusing an ed (or a cover) in a different magazine. Anyway, I don't like it. it's very tacky.
     
  14. TheCheekyCritic

    TheCheekyCritic New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    651
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't even like the grossly overrated Victoria Beckham, but this is a stunning cover shot -- of her, and in general. It's a shame the text, however little there is of it, ruins everything. The "new glamour" text is in too sharp a contrast font-wise to the masthead (though I kinda like it per se), and quite unnecessary anyway; with the risk of sounding like a broken record, a picture does say more than a 1000 words. If it's a good one, anyway.

    Really they should've just kept it simple and followed suit with the January issue of UK Harper's Bazaar, the subscriber's cover of which features minimal text in an appealing, but matching font, describing the cover star and her inside feature. And having just "Victoria" on the cover seems a little silly and unfinished to me anyway. Victoria what? Victoria who?

    I don't even particularly like the red in the masthead, although right now I can't seem to come up with a more suitable color alternative for it...
     
  15. tigerrouge

    tigerrouge don't look down

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2005
    Messages:
    14,763
    Likes Received:
    328
    I knew it was going to be a reprint - and they've gone for a great shot - but why ruin it with that unglamorous salmon pink scrawl, it's too girly to accompany this image.
     
  16. mrsjamesdean

    mrsjamesdean New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,567
    Likes Received:
    0
    great shot ruined by trashy neon lights on the cover :sick:
     
  17. TheCheekyCritic

    TheCheekyCritic New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    651
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hahaha, I didn't even realize the text was made of neon lights until you mentioned it! Blind much? :lol:
     
  18. BerlinRocks

    BerlinRocks New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2005
    Messages:
    11,242
    Likes Received:
    0
    HOW ON EARTH this pure classical image can be "NEW" ????
    nothing new it's ALL OLD !!!

    i feel like in the 40s !

    S*** !

    oh i hadn't seen it was H&B australia.
    ...........
     
    #18 BerlinRocks, Dec 5, 2009
    Last edited by moderator Socrates: Dec 5, 2009
  19. ForChicSake

    ForChicSake New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    13,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    no, no, no they couldn't find a different pic?
     
  20. ALAUU

    ALAUU New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,489
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't mind the text so much, but it just doesn't go with the cover at all. It looks very out of place. But, I loveeee the cover shot. It was actually my favorite shot from the entire editorial. It's very classic and glamorous.
     

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"