Interview Magazine July 2007 : Daniel Craig

[moussemaker]

picture found at ebay

 

[alix*]

oh my.
that's not attractive.

 

[masquerade]

I echo alix* 's sentiment

 

[ShoeGal4Eva]

he doesnt looks that good on that cover

 

[vmob84]

I was expecting hotness...how dissappointing

 

[iluvjeisa]

what...eh..is that hes holding?

 

[truebluejen]

justjared

 

[truebluejen]

more

 

[glósóli]

Eurgh... I've never found him attractive.

 

[iriswills]

...

What a shame. Daniel Craig is so naturally cool and yet the people that style/photograph him try way too hard. The pictures end up looking contrived and awkward. I can only imagine Testino/Vogue getting it right with Daniel.

 

[iluvjeisa]

He's not still photogenic at all. When you see these pix he just doesn't shine through the way he does on the big screen.

 

[kissmesweet]

Terrible cover and terrible ed.

 

[aras]

Interview isn't known to be a magazine about channeling a persons "Hot" factor but their human element, thus the name INTERVIEW. When I received my magazine I was disappointed from the start... I think that they tried to make him seem like your average (yet not so average) guy. It just didn't come out right. Maybe because its just not their style.

Plus is it just me or does it look like in the cover they convey an american look yet on the spread something completely different.

 

[iluvjeisa]

They're working on his Steve McQueen vibe, I guess.

 

[tigerrouge]

He's not still photogenic at all. When you see these pix he just doesn't shine through the way he does on the big screen.

Too true - photos just don't capture what makes him compelling on the screen, that sense of things hidden inside him, simmering below the surface.

 

[sogangsta]

thats an awful cover