It all sounds more like Anna counting her days and doing everything that she thinks her dear friend deserves.
Im not excited at all about such retrospective - selection will be questionable as in that awful book or on past Dior exhibitions
I would love a retrospective on his work tbh even if I think that his work on top of his persona are both very controversial.
An Galliano exhibition would raise questions on Cultural appropriation on top of « is it necessary to put a spotlight on a designer who made antisemitic remarks » and I don’t think the documentary will help in terms of his public image.
The Dior book is one thing but what is interesting for an exhibition is the POV of a curator. Wintour is like an ambassador in this situation because beyond Dior, the archives of John Galliano are also at stakes.
I think it’s always a tricky question when it comes to controversial designers.
The various Chanel exhibitions raises that question. Coco was antisemitic. She was mingling with people from the Far right side of the political milieu before the German military. That’s one thing on her personal story. It becomes tricky when she uses that position to harm people and in that instance, the Weirthemers who are still owners of the brand.
In a way, while that story is more informative for us, it’s both traumatic and tricky for them because they are also benefitting from a good image for Chanel.
I think the documentary about Galliano kind address the questions nobody wants to be asked on the RC of the Met Gala.
But at the same time, do people feel guilty loving his work? I know I don’t.
I don’t know him personally and I don’t have an issue stating the obvious: He said terrible things and is probably questionable on many ways and He is a Great designer!