Kim Kardashian | Page 1168 | the Fashion Spot

Kim Kardashian

Love those shoes, see-through is not my jam, but she looks great to me.

Kim's butt is absolutely atrocious even after being spanxed to death. She should never stand next to someone like Serena with her natural and firm butt. Now that is an *** to envy not that saggy diaper Kim has the nerve to lug around and claim is
With all the money she has, if her butt was fake, wouldn't she pay for it to be firm? Defeats that argument.:lol:
 
You obviously know nothing about natural ***es to even assume that diaper is real. But I forgot, you have "seen" tons and tons of pics of her Khloe when they were kids with a huge bum that you never linked to right?

Hers looks nasty because when you inject fat somewhere, when the person gains weight it all goes there. That is why her *** gets more and more disgusting as time goes by. Especially nasty after North. So miss me with your stanning.

I would love to know how someone who has no muscle definition can get her *** to grow with just squats. Her butt was so big and shapely.....oh wait no it was pretty flat.

2nr2c1c.jpg

52c9r9.jpg

24ec8ix.jpg


Source: Tinypic
 
Last edited by a moderator:
:rolleyes:Their butts look exactly the same, Serena's is more toned, obviously, and she's wearing spandex leggings. The Kim's butt is fake obsession is comical.:lol:

I do love that black dress, she looks great and love the shoes too. The view from the back looks altered, wouldn't put it pass the photo agency to exaggerate her rear.

6Gqnmn9f.jpg

Hollywoodlife

I'm guessing either one of these photos are altered or maybe she did a lot of squats with her sister Khloe to get that huge a**?

Now you know Serena and Kim's a** don't look the same in respect to body proportions. THAT is comical. Those skinny legs are a dead giveaway. But I digress...

Or maybe I'm trippin'. Maybe Nicki's a** is real too. :lol:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
:lol:not to mention that it's hardly glastonbury friendly. :rolleyes::lol:

That was the first thing I noticed. I mean, my God, who wears heels to Glastonbury? I'm sure she had such a hard time walking in the field - a small price she paid in order to look 'good'. And Kanye looks like a war rebel!
 
The butt debate in pictures, hilarious, I love it!:lol:

I'm with her wearing heels at Glatonsbury, (she probably wasn't even on the grass with the general public), those Wellies, or whatever they call them are so gross.
 
The wellies are a neccessity to prevent from ruining your shoes and struggling in the mud all way. I'm not surprised she wore this outfit and heels to Glastonbury. Why would she bother, I'm sure she went just for Kanye's performance and left right after. It's not like she was there for the festival.


The nude coat is beautiful but it looks way too big on her.
 
The coat is really beautiful. I'm mad for her colour schemes with the last two looks.
 
Rolling Stone July 2015
ph. Terry Richardson

rollingstone.com

:ninja::ninja:
 
Guys im confused, wasnt Kim against Terry Richardson?? or am i wrong? now she had a photoshoot with him? :unsure:
 
that's it. i am no longer following rolling stone. i thought it was a music magazine.

and those bOObs... ugh. figures it's terry. :sick:
 
that's it. i am no longer following rolling stone. i thought it was a music magazine.

Tell me about it ! It's even more furstrating when there're names like Mumford & Sons and Tame Impala on the cover...


They did put Snooki from Jersey Shore on the cover once though, so Kim isn't a big deal. My real problem is why she accepted to be photographed like that. So vulgar :sick:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top