Louis Vuitton Spring 2005 Shoes | Page 3 | the Fashion Spot

Louis Vuitton Spring 2005 Shoes

agirlcalledk1ll said:
if they made a plain black pump in this shape, it would be over for me, lol.

guess what!!! :buzz:

00009.jpg
 
brian said:
i wouldn't take their word on that, either.

it does kind of look like the target logo (i noted that when i first saw them), but in reality the target logo is a circle within a circle... those on the shoe are just circles, so there should really be no big deal there.

yea i think thats incorrect because i saw them in the shoe section at the LV new york store:flower:
 
OH!! I really love the color-stripped ones! Very nice!! About time LV makes something interesting
 
The shapes are soooooo Marc Jacobs, I def choose the Marc Jacobs ones over these jokes, esp the silver or white ones. :heart:
 
brian said:
agreed. this heel shape and overall style of pump is my absolute favourite. did you see the ones hermès did for fall 2004? they were like this, but better...more true to the 1950's...exactly like what you'd see a 50's fashion model wearing in an old magazine...those were gorgeous, and are my dream shoe... :crush:

vivienne westwood's also been doing this style of pump for years.

ahhhh don't mention the hermès ones! i went in the boutique, saw them, fell in love, and i never made it back to actually buy them (or even check the price and whatnot!! lol.) everytime i run around trying to find a nice black pump to wear, i think of those and sigh....

i do like the black LV ones, though..and the red ones in the background!

+ good to hear that the target thing wasn't true, lol. i thought it would be pretty silly, since, after all, they ARE just circles (and not the 'bullseye" like the target logo)...he did tell me that, though, before they even had any info and all they had about the speing 05 shoes was a print out of the pics i had seen on style.com weeks before..so i forgive him..
 
Not to offend anyone, but I think they are butt ugly! Not feminine at all. they look like something a grandma should wear, not sexy at all. I'm dissapointed.
 
Only the black ones are acceptable to some extend.
All other pairs look like very cheap shoes from a shoe discounter who's designers misinterpreted high fashion shoes.
But I guess they are o.k. for girls with a shoe festishist boyfriend, who is satisfied by orthopaedic shoes. (Imagine them with a wedge: wouldn't they work for clubfeet then?)
 
Kora said:
Not to offend anyone, but I think they are butt ugly! Not feminine at all. they look like something a grandma should wear, not sexy at all. I'm dissapointed.

um .... well .... I'm dissapointed, too! If you're all watching Dior Haute Coture Fashioon Shows and you think thats normal fashion ( it is), why do you think those Vuittons are not fashionable, but orthopedic? hmm.... those are normal and pretty ( like for me ) pumps. The same thing is Chloe's wooden coturne sandals. Maybe for someone those are like for prisoners ... hahaha ...but in my reckon they are nice, too :flower:
 
StyleIsInUs said:
um .... well .... I'm dissapointed, too! If you're all watching Dior Haute Coture Fashioon Shows and you think thats normal fashion ( it is), why do you think those Vuittons are not fashionable, but orthopedic? hmm.... those are normal and pretty ( like for me ) pumps. The same thing is Chloe's wooden coturne sandals. Maybe for someone those are like for prisoners ... hahaha ...but in my reckon they are nice, too :flower:
Those LV are orthopedic because they're just soo frumpy, they're like masses of leather and metal, the Dior QueenMum somehow managed to not be frumpy, it was very streamlined, sexy in fact. The LV's also have that mini platform and that wierd round toe which makes them seem sooo fat and bulbous...They're not good looking shoes at all...and they make your calves look enormous...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,140
Messages
15,287,785
Members
89,032
Latest member
hey12345
Back
Top