Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Ad Campaigns' started by PradaP, Jul 1, 2004.
Interesting, I wonder if we'll see her in any ads
I thought they were signing Ashley Judd. Michelle's okay, I guess.
I wish they'd come up with more origional names for their make-up
" Flirt" is something that attracts 13 year-olds, not people 25 and up
And as for Michelle Branch...well, they should have stuck to Ashley Judd, that's all I can say
they need sharon stone
Is Estee Lauder trying to find a new target audience??? It's bizarre to me that they would pick Michelle Branch of all people to market their product.
I am a bit skeptical about the fact of Estee Lauder using Michelle... But I can't wait to see the products they'll come up with !
click here for full story
Aw, that's cute. I like her. I don't think she's the most gorgeous person in the world, but she's pretty and seems sweet and cute, and will appeal to the younger crowd, since Estee Lauder doesn't do that much. I've liked her ever since she came out. And congrats to her on her marriage, then!
Michelle's husband, in case anyone's curious.
OMG. He is 40 years old!. He doesn't look 40. I hope they have a good marriage.
He's cute! She's not a typical rail thin celeb, which is great. I hope she's in the ads.
That's what I was thinking...
Why are big cosmetic brands using younger celebs?? Britney for Elizabeth Arden and now Michelle Branch....who next? Avril Lavigne ??
Britney for Elizabeth Arden ?!?!
You know, I think it makes sense... sort of. Estee Lauder is probably the only cosmetic company that has NO teen customer base at all. So it makes sense that they would get a teen-appealing celeb like Michelle (though wouldn't a more makeup-y celebrity like Lindsey Lohan make even more sense?) ::shrugs::
Her is the girl herself advertising the cosmetic.
I hate her posture and that top looks bad on her
It'd probably look better on her if she HAD good posture.
Actually they do, with Jane
just to clarify things a bit, when I say Estee Lauder here, I don't mean EL the makeup brand but instead EL the Company
and Michelle is not representing EL makeup but she's representing another one of the company's many brands
Why are big cosmetic brands using younger celebs?? Britney for Elizabeth Arden and now Michelle Branch....who next? Avril Lavigne ?? [/b][/quote]
I don't think Britney and Michelle can be comparerd, except for the age. Please remember that Michelle was chosen by mister Carlos Santana himself to make a duet. This sole argument should be enough to illustrate the difference between Britney and Michelle...
I read yesterday that EL is using Ashley Judd for their new "American Beauty" line of makeup and skin care that will be sold through Kohl's stores.