Finally someone said it. they make some nice outfits, but nothing exceptional.
And the materials aren't even some expensive or original stuff which would justify -in part- the price.
is that "finally" meant to be ironic?
maybe this sounds a bit harsh, and what i am about to say is by no means exclusively related to your comment, but this thread (and most famously perhaps its first, now archive, part) has been centered almost entirely around the outrageous prices balmain has...
i doubt Decarnin could ever cease to surprise us, and i am sure more pictures will pop up with brocade blazers reaching a couple hundred thousands (i'm kidding... or, just kind of)
but the thing is, isn't the topic a bit tired already?
balmain will be expensive, just as valentino is supposed to be red and girly (someone please tell Chiuri and Piccioli...) and while new examples of how overpriced it is, do add value to this thread, the usual and recurrent "i can't believe it's so expensive! why, oh why is a cut out tshirt so expensive!?" don't really contribute to make the thread grow (if it's not merely in its length)
as always, it is understandable, and we've all had that "i'm speechless, she is so gorgeous" moment in the models threads, or a "pure perfection
" comment on an alber elbaz collection, but really, there should be a way of flicking through a 50 pages long thread, without having to go through all the comments that essentially overstate something that has already been said.
just like off topic posts are deleted, or reposts, or replied photos... can't we do something about going "overtopic"?
there should be a way to structure the threads so that posts could be "publicly" liked or acknowledged (sort of how fb works?) so that they wouldn't have to be split in two/three/... parts because of their length in pages (not content)