Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Vintage Magazines' started by gem, Apr 22, 2004.
Photo by Terry Richardson.
she looks cute
I wish the cover could look better. I like Maggie ... but sometimes .. I don't know -- she reminds me of a sad sad puppy found lost on the street.
oh.. gross! this would surely make me NOT buy the magazine. how unsightly.
i like it......i like the candid nature of nylon. but she always has that look on her face
One look at the picture and I could tell.
i still haven't decided what i think about the cover, but i like as an actress and i think she is a little mysterious looking.
dont like it at all
She's not BEAUTIFUL, but I think that's what I like about her...she's great
Totally agree, Lo.
I'm loving this cover. Why the hell does every cover have to feature some beatiful girl in a pose that would never be created in a situation in real life. Thats not to say that I don't love and appreciate editorials and things like that, I just adore that this is different.
they could have done abit better...photoshop! she looks like am old woman
She seems to be old
One of the worst eye makeup I've ever seen...
it's okay that she's not beautiful, but at least the makeup could be better
uggh she freaks me out.
surpised no one has mentioned terry richardson's hand in the shot....(at her neck)...
that creeps me out a bit...but then, so does terry richardson...
i always think maggie looks great though...
i thought that was her hand in her hair
Anyway i dont like the cover at all...shes definitely not one of my favourite actresses and i agree, her eyes remind me of a puppy as well
Ah yes, him and his tattoos.
I don't like the way she looks out at us as though we're him
I often buy the indie mags for their love of Terry Richardson, he intrigues me. Hate this cover, absolutely hate. I love Nylon and I am so tired of the Wal Mart glamour shots on these covers but...there is a such thing as too little glamour. She looks ill.
I don't like it at all.