Paper 'Break the Internet' 2018 : Amanda Bynes by Danielle Levitt

She's supposed to 'break the internet' with a cover and preview which looks like a glorified Glamour filler edit? This is just way too basic to follow in the footsteps of Kim's infamous Goude shoot. Her team would've been better off selling her story to People or US Weekly because Paper failed to capitalise on this exclusive. Fashion never really cared for Amanda Bynes, so they needed to have gone the extra mile to show her off in a more edgier and inventive way than this.

That lip and hair colour looks awful especially with her eyes, and I don't get the generic tv 'reporter/FBI agent' outfit. So no visual talking point.

 

This magazine has become a joke

 

I honestly don't like the final result that much. I like the mood of the cover but it is uninteresting. The photos look heavily photoshopped too.

But I'm happy for Amanda Bynes to get a cover! I watched her show when I was a kid so she holds a soft spot in my heart. I hope she is doing better ❤️❤️

I would never actually buy Paper for 10$ because that's outrageous!! This nice hotel downtown has Paper for free so I'm lucky to snag a copy from there

 

i think it's mutually beneficial - and while a magazine seems like a retro place for a big exclusive, the images and article have already dissipated globally, so in that sense it's a success. She looks quite healthy now, and I admire her honesty in the article.

 

While the photos here are underwhelming, the interview is quite nice and it is already everywhere on the internet.

 

I agree that the cover is really underwhelming, and nothing really works in the shots, from the makeup to the clothes. But I think they've tried to dress her down into a more ...er...relaxed look, so no over-the-top clothes take away from the fact that she's the focus. I've just taken a look at the shots on Paper's website of her, and she looks almost frozen in all but one of the shots, where she's laughing. She looks beautiful and like her old self in it. The article on her is good; she doesn't make excuses for her very tumultuous past few years, but she recognises her mistakes and if the article is anything to go by, she's rebuilding herself and entering a much healthier and safer headspace - really good on her

 

what is up with those lips colors? she looks like she's been dead for 2 days

 

The only way this would "break the internet" is if someone lost their wireless connection while looking at the images.

 

Poor Amanda, this doesn't do her any justice, looks like a Seventeen Magazine shoot...

 

I AM SCREAMING!!!

 

I had no idea who she was, so I googled her - still no idea who she is. I would expect someone a bit more "cult" to come and "break the internet".

 

Everything looks amateurish. Lousy photoshop editing, style, make-up, etc. Just try again.

 

they really made a horrible editorial of her. She looks like an ugly mannequin/Sophia the robot with a wig

 

OMG, You're right she looks just like Sophia. I'm cracking up.

 

WHYYYYYYYY?!

 

Cover 2

Lindsay Lohan by Jeff Bark

 

When you really can use "tells all" after the name of the celebrity and you dont... Aghhhhh fashion magazines...

Well I never really get over the late 00's celebrity culture so for me Im having a blast, but Im aware that in a fashion point of view this is boring, especially the Amanda's cover and ed. Lindsay Lohan looks cute, but I fell like, back in the day, they explore her fashion image so much that now anything coming from her is, IDK, less exciting? Sorry Lilo.

 

Really bad photoshop the top of her hair is cut really badly so that they could put the masthead. I agree with ghostwriter10549 there's nothing exciting about Lindsay Lohan and Snow White anymore.

 

Are you kidding me? Making this gorgeous Lindsay cover digital only over the Amanda monstrosity.