THE VOGUE WEBSITE REVIEW:::
I think Vogue below offers an adult review of this fun and sexy show. Again the staging, like Jeremy Scott's is a welcome CHANGE from the cookie cutter TENT shows (and drab US sportswear commerciality) that make NYC fashion week so much less interesting than Paris Milan or London. also sexuality, in its many expressions hAS been the backbone of the fashion business since the mid-60s at least. anyone who is too chaste, virginal or prudish to accept a show like this in my opinion should examine THEIR OWN hangups & ask themselves WHENCE they come & how can they exist in the prurient, fleshy, sexual world of fashion 2003? Pour some sugar on me. !
I thank you... r/o:
–""" In spring, wrote Tennyson, a young man’s fancy lightly turns to thoughts of love. In the case of quirky knitwear designer Pierrot, that sometimes means more of a triple-X affair than a tender, courtly romance.
Pierrot presented his collection on the soundstage of The Maury Povich Show, where he’d built a flimsy movie set, and had his models pretend to be making a p*rn flick, complete with roving film crew and cheesy props. It didn’t have all that much to do with the clothes, but there was a good-natured, low-budget charm to the performance. And with the exception of some disturbingly enthusiastic cameo appearances by Mimi Rogers (who, incidentally, looked pretty good in Pierrot’s clingy knits), it was all pretty G-rated.
As was the collection. Flippy skirts in delicate pink or white crochet, colorful little sweaters with humorously suggestive flower motifs, and pretty sweater dresses all make perfect springtime fare. Those who see knitwear as largely a winter category should take a closer look at this designer’s handiwork, with some caveats:The black knit chaps and the tops depicting very explicit sexual acts should probably go right back to wardrobe. """
Very true.
