Polaroids/Digitals | Page 428 | the Fashion Spot

Polaroids/Digitals

Definitely the most interesting girl on this page. Great crossover appeal and intense stare. Way :heart:
 
The background in Margitas pics is so distracting. She's very pretty, though. And I absolutely love Jessica's look.
 
There's something about Rebecca that I find really, really intriguing. I quite like her!
 
Josefine Svenningsen @ Elite Copenhagen



00002ae9.jpg


elitemodellook
 
I think Bruna has a particularly-unmodelesque face.

I think that particularly modelesque faces have become too present (and numerous especially) therefore they can appear as boring. At least that's my point of view and deep feeling each time I see a typical Russian/Scandinavian/Dutch- looking 5'10 tall 16yo teenager. But that might be just me...

I'm not especially fond of Bruna (though she is cute somehow but cuteness is not always enough I agree), there were people something like 3-4 years ago to think Arizona Muse's look was particularly unmodelesque.
 
Well, to be modelesque I don't think your looks have to pertain to the modelling trend of the moment. Bruna may have some of the assets needed, but I think her features are far too common and uneasy. Regardless, she's a pretty girl.
 
Well, to be modelesque I don't think your looks have to pertain to the modelling trend of the moment. Bruna may have some of the assets needed, but I think her features are far too common and uneasy. Regardless, she's a pretty girl.

I know and wasn't targeting your conception of 'modelesque' in particular... Just the general tendency, that unfortunately also affects agencies nowadays, to consider one type (or a limited few types) of faces as corresponding to 'model potential' and ignoring most others just for in order to avoid risks. This trend has led to an army of similar-looking models and a dramatic decrease of the chances to succeed for many of them. Certainly the best ones will stand up one way or another but I can't help... it's kinda sad when this business gives more chances to standardized replicas and less to interesting/challenging individuals. Which literally means more turnover and... more turmoil in the end.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top