Racial Diversity In Modeling | Page 34 | the Fashion Spot

Racial Diversity In Modeling

Status
Not open for further replies.
^ Cavalli (like many other designers) tends to use black models in his shows whenever they happen to fit the theme. Last season he had Liya open and close the show, and also used Kinee & Mia Niara because of the "Out of Africa" theme that was going on with the collection :lol:. Most black models tend to do better during the Spring presentations...at least that's how it seems when I look through the various shows.

The industry can only digest one succesful black model at a time. We've had Naomi, and then came Alek, Liya and now it appears to be that Chanel Iman is the chosen one. She has walked for 58 shows this season and while that amount of runway shows would translate in an avalanche of campaigns & editorials for her white counterparts I highly doubt that she'll be as prominent in print...but i'm hopeful!.

I think that Kinee came at the wrong time, unfortunately. She'd be absolutely huge 5 or 6 years ago.
 
from the nytimes....

Runways Fade to White

By GUY TREBAY
IN the days of blithe racial assumptions, flesh crayons were the color of white people. “Invisible” makeup and nude pantyhose were colored in the hues of Caucasian skin. The decision by manufacturers to ignore whole segments of humanity went unchallenged for decades before the civil rights movement came along and nonwhite consumers started demanding their place on the color wheel.

Nowadays the cultural landscape is well populated with actors, musicians, media moguls and candidates for the American presidency drawn from the 30 percent of the American population that is not white. Yet, if there is one area where the lessons of chromatic and racial diversity have gone largely unheeded, it is fashion. This reality was never plainer than during the recent showings of the women’s spring 2008 collections in New York and Europe.

Although black women in the United States spend more than $20 billion on apparel each year, according to estimates by TargetMarketNews.com, it was hard to discern an awareness of this fact on the part of designers showing in New York, where black faces were more absent from runways than they have been in years.

Of the 101 shows and presentations posted on Style.com during the New York runway season, which ended a month ago, more than a third employed no black models, according to Women’s Wear Daily. Most of the others used just one or two. When the fashion caravan moved to London, Paris and Milan, the most influential shows — from Prada to Jil Sander to Balenciaga to Chloé and Chanel — made it appear as if someone had hung out a sign reading: No Blacks Need Apply.

“It’s the worst it’s ever been,” said Bethann Hardison, a former model who went on to start a successful model agency in the 1980s that promoted racial diversity.

AMONG the people she represented were Naomi Campbell and Tyson Beckford, the chiseled hunk who broke barriers in the 1990s by becoming the unexpected symbol of the country-club fantasia that is a Ralph Lauren Polo campaign.

“It’s heartbreaking for me now because the agents send the girls out there to castings and nobody wants to see them,” said Ms. Hardison, referring to black models. “And if they do, they’ll call afterward and say, ‘Well, you know, black girls do much better in Europe, or else black girls do much better in New York, or we already have our black girl.’”

Last month in New York, Ms. Hardison convened a panel of fashion experts at the Bryant Park Hotel to discuss “The Lack of the Black Image in Fashion Today,” an event she will reprise Monday at the New York Public Library on 42nd Street. “Modeling is probably the one industry where you have the freedom to refer to people by their color and reject them in their work,” she said.

The exclusion is rarely subtle. An agent for the modeling firm Marilyn once told Time magazine of receiving requests from fashion clients that baldly specified “Caucasians only.”

The message is not always so blatant these days, but it is no less clear. Take for example the case of two young models, one white, one black, both captivating beauties at the start of their careers. Irina Kulikova, a feline 17-year-old Russian, appeared on no fewer than 24 runways in New York last month, a success she went on to repeat in Milan with 14 shows, and in Paris with 24 more. Honorine Uwera, a young Canadian of Rwandan heritage, was hired during the New York season for just five runway shows.

While Ms. Uwera’s showing was respectable, it was not enough to justify the cost to her agency of sending her to Europe, where most modeling careers are solidified.

“We represent a lot of ethnic girls,” said Ivan Bart, the senior vice president of IMG Models, which represents a roster of the commercially successful models of the moment, among them black superstars like Alek Wek, Ms. Campbell and Liya Kebede.

“We have new girls, too,” Mr. Bart added, young comers like Ms. Uwera, Quiana Grant and Mimi Roche. “We include them in our show package, give them the same promotion as any other girl, and get the same responses: ‘She’s lovely, but she’s not right for the show.’”

Although, in fact, Ms. Roche and Ms. Grant, both black, were seen on runways in the last five weeks, the reality was that only one black model worked at anything like the frequency of her white counterparts: Chanel Iman Robinson, 17, who is African-American and Korean. Particularly in Milan and Paris, Ms. Robinson’s was often the only nonwhite face amid a blizzard of Eastern European blondes.

It is not just a handful of genetically gifted young women who are hurt by this exclusion. Vast numbers of consumers draw their information about fashion and identity from runways, along with cues about what, at any given moment, the culture decrees are the new contours of beauty and style.

“Years ago, runways were almost dominated by black girls,” said J. Alexander, a judge on “America’s Next Top Model,” referring to the gorgeous mosaic runway shows staged by Hubert de Givenchy or Yves Saint Laurent in the 1970s. “Now some people are not interested in the vision of the black girl unless they’re doing a jungle theme and they can put her in a grass skirt and diamonds and hand her a spear.”

And some people, said Diane Von Furstenberg, the designer and president of the Council of Fashion Designers of America, “just don’t think about it at all.” Ms. Von Furstenberg herself has always employed models of all ethnicities on her runways. (This September, she hired seven black women, more perhaps than any single label except Baby Phat and Heatherette.) Yet she is increasingly the exception to an unspoken industry rule.

“I always want to do that,” she said, referring to the casting of women of color. “I can make a difference. We all can. But so much is about education and to talk about this is an important beginning.”

But isn’t it strange, she was asked, that she would have to invoke the rhetoric of racial inclusiveness at a time when Oprah Winfrey is the most powerful woman in media, and Barack Obama is running for president?
“Why did we go backward?” Ms. Von Furstenberg asked.

Agents blame designers for the current state of affairs. Designers insist agents send them nothing but skinny blondes. Magazine editors bemoan the lack of black women with the ineffable attributes necessary to put across the looks of a given season.

The current taste in models is for blank-featured “androids,” whose looks don’t offer much competition to the clothes, pointed out James Scully, a seasoned agent who made his mark casting the richly diverse Gucci shows in the heyday of Tom Ford. In today’s climate, it is far more difficult to promote a black woman than her white counterpart.

“You want to sell the model on the basis of her beauty, not her race,” said Kyle Hagler, an agent at IMG. Yet when he sends models out on casting calls based on what he terms a “beauty perspective,” omitting any mention to potential clients of race, “You always get a call back saying, ‘You didn’t tell me she was black.’”

THE reasons for this may seem obvious, and yet the unconscious bigotry is tricky to pin down.

“I’m not pointing a finger and saying people are racist,” said Ms. Hardison, who nevertheless recounted a recent exchange with the creative director of a major fashion label: “She said to me, ‘I have to be honest with you, when a girl walks in, I just don’t see color.’ Meanwhile, they have one girl, or more likely, none in their show.”

Ms. Hardison explained: “‘I don’t see color?’ Does that mean, you don’t want to see?”

There is something illustrative of the entire issue, and the state of the industry, to be found in this September’s Italian Vogue.

Just one image of a black model appears in the issue, midway through a 17-page article photographed by Miles Aldridge and titled the “Vagaries of Fashion.” In it, the glacial blond Anja Rubik portrays an indolent, overdressed Park Avenue princess with a gilded apartment, a couture wardrobe, two towhead children and a collection of heavy rocks. The sole black model in the pictorial is more modestly attired, in an aproned pinafore.

She plays the maid.
 
^ Wow ... very powerful article. When are we gonna get past the maid thing?

So are they really able to get away with this on the basis of they can hire any "look" they want because it's fashion? Has anyone challenged this legally? I suppose everyone's afraid to, because it will be the "end" of an agency/individual career? Would love to hear from someone with authoritative knowledge on this point ...

I am really looking forward to a time when we can get past tokenism, for both women and people of color ... but in this particular case, across-the-board tokenism would actually be progress ...
 
Here's another article from Uk Guardian

Why are all the models white?



[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]At this season's fashion shows, there has barely been a black or Asian face on the catwalks. Hadley Freeman reports from Paris on the whitewashing of the catwalk[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif]Friday October 5, 2007
The Guardian

[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif]A disturbing problem has appeared on the catwalks this season. It is one that suggests the fashion industry has not just a warped but a fully offensive mentality when it comes to judging how women should look. It is a problem that has been simmering for some time, but because talking about it might offend the designers and scare off lucrative advertising accounts, hardly anyone has spoken out - and things have only got worse. We now have a situation that could lead to serious problems not only for some models, but for the public as a whole, making millions of women feel ugly, undesirable and simply wrong. And no, this is not about weight - it's about race.[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif][/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif]The modelling business has always been dominated by Caucasian faces but not for a long time has the situation been so extreme. This season's catwalks have been whiter than ever. "It's true - it has been particularly bad," says Michael Roberts, fashion director of Vanity Fair. "There seem to be only three or four models [from] ethnic minority [backgrounds] around at the moment. The fashion industry, for all its airs of sophistication, has very insular ideas of beauty. It's supposed to be a global industry but this is not being reflected on the runway." [/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif]

I saw two black models and two Asian models during the whole of Milan fashion week - compared with hundreds of white ones. They were the same four I saw in New York. And in Paris it has been even worse. It is absolutely the norm for a show to be entirely Caucasian. If a black or Asian model is used it is either in a streetwear show, such as Babyphat in New York, or as a form of what the London-based Nigerian designer Duro Olowu calls "tokenism - you know, just the one black girl, and she's usually wearing the crazy printed dress". A good example of this was at the Dior show in Paris this week when the Asian model was assigned the Chinese-style dress. "Then these designers claim they get their ideas from the street or from Africa! It's crazy!" says Olowu. "This is just not reflective of our time."

According to targetmarketnews.com black women alone spend £10bn on fashion every year, and that isn't even accounting for the increasingly high-spending Asian markets. But not even the recent launches of Chinese and Indian Vogue seem to have made much of an impact on the runways, although a recent report in the fashion trade journal Women's Wear Daily claimed that there is "a notable increase" in Asian models, doubtless thanks to their naturally slim build and a lucrative market. Of black models, however, there is a definite "lack". This seems ironic considering that, in the past, the fashion industry prided itself on breaking barriers, appreciating all manner of female beauty. In her recently published autobiography, the Sudanese model Alek Wek claims the fashion industry has been nothing but supportive of her, celebrating her non-Caucasian looks and, for the first time in her life, "making her feel beautiful". But Wek's experience appears to be very much the exception to the rule.

"Look at the runways of the 70s and 80s - there was a cross-section and it was reflective of the industry being international. Now you just have white girls who are 14 or 15 and who barely know how to walk," says Olowu.

"I guess the fashion tide has turned - the trend seems to be for young models from eastern Europe," suggests Edward Enniful, contributing editor to US Vogue.
The truth is, though, that fashion has never been particularly strong in this area. Yes, Yves Saint Laurent may have made what was then an extraordinary step by casting black models in his early shows. However, in a book published last year about Saint Laurent, The Beautiful Fall, writer Alicia Drake recounts how the designer once refused to cast a black model because she was too "Musée de l'Homme [Natural History Museum]". At a recent New York panel discussion on the lack of black models, Naomi Campbell recounted how, at the height of the supermodel era, Christy Turlington told Dolce & Gabbana: "If you don't use Naomi, you don't get us." By "us" she meant herself and Linda Evangelista.

During the same panel discussion Bethann Hardison, a former model, said: "This is the one industry that still has the freedom to refer to people by their colour and reject them. I came up in the 60s. I feel it's worse than it's ever been." Such a feeling stands up to closer analysis: there have certainly been black supermodels in the past - Iman, Tyra Banks and, of course, Naomi Campbell. Now, however, it's difficult to name a single black model, let alone a supermodel.

The situation has worsened because the fashion industry has become more corporate, with big conglomerates buying small companies and more money up for grabs, and the whole business has become much more conservative, hence the endless recycling of trends from decades past, and the way the runways look more and more alike - and more and more white.

Who exactly is to blame for the lack of black faces is more of a chicken-and-egg issue. Do the agents ask only for Caucasian girls, or is it the designers? Many blame the former. Julia, a 19-year-old black model who featured in Olowu's show in London last month, and who did not want to give her surname, says that her agency in Paris told her not to bother even coming for the shows this year. "They said I'm not tall enough," she says, with a sceptical roll of her eyes. "I know girls just as tall as me who are going. There is a problem. I've seen it first hand."

Enniful echoes this point: "Casting agencies just don't look for black girls - I've had to start scouting [for non-white models] myself instead of waiting for the agencies to come forward. There are one or two bookers out there who are good, but there definitely need to be more."

But the truth is, casting agents work for designers and if designers wanted something other than Caucasian faces, they would find and supply it for them. Olowu, whose recent show featured almost wholly non-white models, is uncompromising: "The fault lies with the designers - their ignorance and their racism. Yes, it's true that a lot of agencies don't bother sending non-white models - my casting agent told me that I'm the only one who asks specifically for non-white models - but things will only change if the designers take a stand and ask for them."

But it's worth asking if we, the public, play a part. As with the debate about why designers favour models with visible bones instead of flesh, they are showing what they think the public wants. "What's really shocking to me is that no one seems to talk about this problem. The British Fashion Council and the media get all excited about underweight models but on this subject, they don't seem to notice," says Olowu.
"I really can't see anything changing soon," says Roberts. "When I started in this business my being black was odd, but being a man was more so. To be honest, I don't know if things are worse but it's strange now that there are hardly any major black models."
If the public really does want the situation to change, people have to make the point the only way the fashion business understands: by not buying products from designers who believe there is no beauty beyond the pale.

http://lifeandhealth.guardian.co.uk/fashion/story/0,,2184302,00.html
[/FONT]
 
more from jezebel:

A thorough look at the October issues of nine of the largest American women's fashion/service magazines reveals that black models are far more common in advertisements than fashion editorials. (Don't get us started about magazine covers.) Certainly, you can blame the squeamishness of advertisers for the unchallenging, stale, and hypocritical content within women's magazines (and you'd be right in doing so) but they come off as refreshingly progressive with regards to skin color. (Of course, it all boils down to money: corporate America, if not Anna Wintour, has listened to the recent estimates that black women spend a whopping $20 billion a year on apparel.) But let's not blame Anna for everything: Not only does she have a black best friend, she's only doing what every other editor is doing:


Black Models In Advertisements, October 2007:
Marie Claire: 10, 1 of whom is a celebrity: Walgreens (3), Olay (1), Johnson's Soft Lotion (1), Diesel (1), CoverGirl (1), Puma (2), JCPenney (1).
W: 3, 1 of whom is a celebrity: Target (1), L'Oreal (1), Turks & Caicos tourism board (1).
Vogue: 6, 4 of whom are celebrities: Revlon (1), American Express (1), Diesel (1), JCPenney (1), Vaseline (1), Avon (1).
Harper's Bazaar: 2, 1 of whom is a celebrity: Make-A-Wish Foundation (1), CoverGirl (1).
Glamour: 3, none of whom are celebrities : Aquafresh White Trays (1), Liz Clairborne (1), Lee Jeans (1).
Cosmopolitan: 0.
Allure: 8, 4 of whom are celebrities: Diesel (1), Revlon (1), Sephora (1), L'Oreal (1), Revlon (1), Aquafresh White Trays (1), CoverGirl (1), Olay (1),
Lucky: 9, 4 of whom are celebrities: CoverGirl (1), Target (1), American Express (1), MAC Cosmetics (1), Dillard's (1), Puma (2), Sephora (1), Avon (1)
Elle: 13, 3 of whom are celebrities: Target (1), MAC Cosmetics (1), Diesel (1), Puma (2), Benetton (1), Avon Foundation (1), House of Dereon (4), Secret (1), Botox (1).

Black Models In Fashion Editorial, October 2007:
Marie Claire: 1, starring solo in a 6-page fashion editorial
W: 1, appearing on 1 page of a 20-page fashion editorial
Vogue: 0
Harper's Bazaar: 0
Glamour: 0
Cosmopolitan: 0
Allure: 0
Lucky: 0
Elle: 0
 
The fashion industry just disgusts me more and more every day. They can't promote diversity of ANY kind. It's all the same exact thing- same bodies, same skin tone, same feautures-- i don't even know what to say about it anymore
 
I don't want to get into the discussion on a deeper level but I wanted to put in my two cents. Bottom line is, if you're not in the 13-21 age range, 5'9'' + and 100 lbs and preferably fair skined you won't have a shot in hell in today's fashion biz. I take the brazilian models as an example. Most of them look like any other european or north american girl. Maybe 2 or 3 of them "represent" the typical brazilian woman (olive skin, slightly big butt, dark eyes and hair). Most of them are green or blue eyed, have light hair and skinny bodies (please let's not say that Gisele is curvaceous, it's ludicrous), italian or german roots. Of course they do represent Brazil in a way but they don't represent the average brazilian woman. You'll hardly see brazilian models from the southeast and northern parts of the country - they come mostly from the south, which is basically populated by european descendants.

This all goes to say that, in my honest opinion, everything about the fashion business is wrong. Not only the race and weight issues, but also the age problem and the message that's being sent out. I say we take over Vogue and make it an anarchist experiment, not before making Anna Wintour put away her whole wardrobe in favour of American Apparel. :lol:
 
this season has been rather dreadful. Another funny thing i noticed on FTV is how they show very few black models. I was watching a swimwear fashion show and noticed that they only showed a black model once! the other times whenever a black model would come on, they quickly zoomed on to the next white model! Its suprising that fashion which is supposed to be the trendsetter has been left behind in terms of race and colour!
 
maybe to add onto post 493, the black model in W was actually dressed as a maid!!!!
 
maybe to add onto post 493, the black model in W was actually dressed as a maid!!!!

Shockingly awful.

Does fashion have no thought leaders to step forward & address this???

DVF is in a position to do something about this, and we know she agrees.
 
from jezebel.com

Last night I attended an event called "Out Of Fashion: The Absence Of Color," a "conversation" hosted by longtime agent Bethann Hardison and held at the New York Public Library. The discussion attempted to draw attention to the question: Why have images of black models been in sharp decline in high fashion for more than a decade? Also on the panel: Designer Tracy Reese, casting agent James Scully, model agent David Ralph and stylist Lori Goldstein. In attendance were Iman, Vera Wang, photographer Marc Baptiste, industry insiders, writers, editors and dozens of black models.

Ms. Hardison began by explaining that in the '80s and 90s, there were many black models, but the decline has been steady -- and scary. She said she was hoping to bring a radical change in the industry, and named some of her pet peeves, including: Image-makers not having the eye to define black beauty; image-makers allowing only one black model at a time; hearing that black covers don't sell, hearing "I already have one or two black models"; the fact that agents have such a tough time selling black models that they get worn down. Also, modeling agencies often do not allow black "marquee name" models to be photographed for "black" magazines. She noted that since fashion has become such a huge industry and people around the world see images of runway shows, this is not a small issue. "Globally, it affects everybody."

James Scully has been in the business for over 20 years, worked in Milan, and in addition to booking models for Harper's Bazaar, had worked for Gucci under Tom Ford. He argued that if Tom Ford said, "Bring me a beautiful girl," he meant a beautiful girl of any color, which is how Liya Kebede ended up with an exclusive contract for Gucci in 2000. He went on to say that the next wave of fashion, which was lead by Prada, leaned toward blank, colorless models -- a runway in which all the girls were virtually the same, and there were absolutely no faces of color. "Everyone followed," he said, meaning that Prada set a trend for other designers. (Check the Spring 2008 Prada runway show and you will see: Zero black models.)

Ms. Hardison said that designers don't even like models anymore, explaining that in her day, a designer and a model were like a husband and wife, working together, in a relationship. Everyone seemed to agree that the trend now is toward younger, cheaper, faceless, nameless models.

Lori Goldstein acknowledged that the business has changed. "It's homogenous," she said, and admitted that there were a lack of "ethnic" girls in the packages that the agencies send out.

At some point, the discussion turned to black women who have narrow features -- do they represent black beauty, or are they merely "white girls dipped in chocolate?" Iman got pissed. "Each person in Africa is different, you cannot say that one look is 'African,'" she argued from the audience, with a microphone provided for her.

Blatant racism was discussed as well. Mr. Scully pointed out that when he was first working with Liya Kebede, some designers and photographers were not interested in working with her because she was black. Once they saw her in photoshoots he had successfully pitched for her, some of them said, "I love her, who is that?"

One editor recounted a story of working at Vibe, and told of how someone at Manolo Blahnik would not loan the magazine shoes for a photo shoot. Former editor Emil Wilbekin called Iman, Iman called Manolo Blahnik himself, and suddenly they had "a whole lotta shoes" for the shoot.

A photographer in the audience noted that fashion is about exclusivity, so naturally, minorities get excluded. Another audience member, who works closely with Louis Vuitton, said that they would often make sure there was at least one Asian model in the shows since Asia is a huge market for them.

Photographer Marc Baptiste asked, "It's 2007. What is the solution?" Ms. Hardison replied, "We're all trying to figure that out" and said it was important to keep talking. "It's a slow tsunami," she explained, "we have to keep rolling forward." She did say that she would meet with Diane Von Furstenberg and the CDFA soon. She also said, "I feel like there is one person, behind a curtain, like in The Wizard Of Oz, turning the knobs. And that person could change everything. And we all have to think, 'Who could that one person be?' Think of that one person," she urged the audience. "Don't say it! Just think it."
 
From the article:

"I feel like there is one person, behind a curtain, like in The Wizard Of Oz, turning the knobs. And that person could change everything. And we all have to think, 'Who could that one person be?' Think of that one person," she urged the audience. "Don't say it! Just think it."


People shouldn't just think of that person - they should stop buying her magazine as well. Money talks and when it stops pouring in it screams.
 
I went to the shop again today, only different looking person was Oprah, others ran into one another...and if I see Scarjo on another cover I'm going to scream, she's cute and all but just how many covers does she need a year anyway? D:
 
^ I looooove what she said about the Wizard!!! :lol:

Yes, it's true, Anna could get off her skinny white butt & do something ... but she's not the only one. My vote is for DVF, because she believes in diversity and helping new models. If Anna really wanted to, she could've done something before now, no question. Which is not to say she shouldn't do it now ... just that she's not the only one who can make a real difference.
 
^ I looooove what she said about the Wizard!!! :lol:

Yes, it's true, Anna could get off her skinny white butt & do something ... but she's not the only one. My vote is for DVF, because she believes in diversity and helping new models. If Anna really wanted to, she could've done something before now, no question. Which is not to say she shouldn't do it now ... just that she's not the only one who can make a real difference.

That's true and I completely agree with you, but Anna is in charge of a magazine that reaches far more people than DVF's designs and beliefs do. If Vogue decided that diversity is a good thing it would have an impact in the industry as a whole and also in people's minds (as far as the influence of a fashion magazine goes). Anna is not the only one who could make a change, but she's the one who could make the bigger difference.
 
I agree that Anna could (and should) do something. She is uniquely positioned to reach so many people, and the insular industry. I have often wondered about the various causes one could champion in her position. Art vs. commerce maybe? Or of course racism. I think the issue she chose is age instead, and so she puts Nicole, Renee, Uma, and lately, Charlize on the cover every other month. I think that is noble, because of course women don't fall off the planet once they hit 30 or whatever, etc. But surely she has enough clout in her position to champion every cause? I think she walks a strange line, because she acts omnipotent, and impotent at the same time. At once seemingly claiming that she is the ultimate decider, but also very obviously not doing anything about issues that should be addressed. I really don't know what to think, maybe she really just doesn't care.
 
Maybe she's just comfortable in her position and doesn't want to make any significant changes that could jeopardise her good relations with the industry. But even so, not doing anything shouldn't be an option for someone so powerful. All the excuses can't make up for the fact that the most powerful woman in this business chose to remain (immorally) silent about so many issues.
 
That's true and I completely agree with you, but Anna is in charge of a magazine that reaches far more people than DVF's designs and beliefs do. If Vogue decided that diversity is a good thing it would have an impact in the industry as a whole and also in people's minds (as far as the influence of a fashion magazine goes). Anna is not the only one who could make a change, but she's the one who could make the bigger difference.

I'm not talking about DVF as a designer, but as president of CFDA, where she has significant influence over both American designers, and on her peer(s) in other fashion capitols as well ...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,354
Messages
15,298,479
Members
89,320
Latest member
melinnea
Back
Top