Announcing... The 3rd annual theFashionSpot Awards for 2025. Vote NOW via the links below:
Designer of the YearThank you for participating!
VOTING WILL CLOSE 29/12/2025 EOD!

to much cleavage).
That isn't to say that they don't look nice from time to time, or that it's their fault that their labeled "icons". But the term style icon suggests something more than just following trends, getting press coverage and causing half a dozen people to copy the look in every day life 
Fabulyss said:I'm all for this thread, I hate hollywood and everything about it. Including a dime a dozen coked up 'starlets' who fancy themselves 'style icons'.

australian_girl said:style icons are people who influence style.
Mary-Kate Olsen influenced Marc Jacobs and many other top designers mentioned the olsens.
Have you not seen the catwalk lately? All of the top designers have outfits that are screaming MK. Whether you think they have style or not, you can not deny it, these girls have influenced fashion. From the catwalk these looks are watered down to eventually filter into mainstream chain stores.
But i agree they are too young to be considered style icons. To say that any of the "it stars" are style icons is absurd. How can you say this after a couple of trendy seasons.
I do beleive that MK&A Olsen will stand the test of time.
Also i think Ashley differs from the bartons,richies and lohans because she shows youth but MATURITY in her clothes. Something the other brats are largely lacking. (Sorry to offend anyone by calling them brats).
When you see girls shopping in the city, you can tell the ones that are just rich and can afford to buy from designers and follow trends, and than you see the ones that actually have their own style.
Alex Curran is no rival for kate Moss!