Share with us... Your Best & Worst Collections of Haute Couture F/W 2025.26
You really think they would be featured as much if Diana isn't their aunt?Reminds me of the recent Vanity Fair cover with Barbra Streisand.
She's continually on covers because of the constant myth-making (or money-making) - but if Diana had married unremarkably, she still would have appeared in Tatler every now and again, by dint of having been born a Spencer.
Leaving aside the royal side, her family is featured in the magazine nearly every month - Charles Spencer's eldest son is a good-looking lad, and Kitty, Eliza and Amelia have been fixtures for a while, with Tatler covers of their own.
If Diana had never existed, the Spencers would still appear in Tatler. Some of the aristocratic families of the British Isles have been going for a long time, and they are the bread-and-butter of what appears on those pages.You really think they would be featured as much if Diana isn't their aunt?
I don't think it's hate, but I think it's just oversaturation with her (and her children). Anyway, isn't this just in time for the new season of The Crown?I'm surprise reading the hate on her. The charity work she did was immense. And she was the first known person that touch an AIDS patient, creating a new awareness about the virus and the people that was dying alone in terrible conditions. Diana made a lot for us, and not only as a fashion icon.. It's so moving looking at those pictures.
Um... but she wasn't an angel, she was an actual human being. Flaws and all.It's like beating to death an angel just for nothing.