The Business of Magazines

That's a great cover! Great simple elements. and clever from Net a porter to launch the mag, everything at its time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's now confirmed that Andre Leon Talley (along with his glorious capes) is leaving the hallowed halls of Vogue in favor of full-time focus on his late-night talk show, where he'll purportedly bring on all of his fabulous, fashionable friends and interrogate them with his signature irreverence.
Refinery 29
 
Seems Time Warner is shedding its self of it's print side of it's business. This is troubling for many hundreds of magazines that they own worldwide with a 6 percent redundancy of worldwide staff.

There's a n interesting article about the situation with Time Inc here.

Time Inc. may be baked into the name of Time Warner, but it long ago lost salience as a significant player in the company’s business. Time Inc. earnings dropped 5 percent last year, and the division now contributes less than 12 percent of overall sales at the company. The Time & Life building, an edifice standing tall in the middle of Midtown, was long a revered totem of the publishing business. To people in the industry who came of age back when things were good, Time Inc. was legend, having grown up not just on the force of its journalism but on tales of editors’ offices the size of racquetball courts and liquor carts rumbling through the hall spreading cheer and an aura of privilege.
 
Dazed & Confused appoints new Fashion Director
Robbie Spencer has been appointed Fashion Director of Dazed & Confused and DazedDigital.com, with effect the July issue. Robbie started at the magazine in 2004 and currently is the title's Senior Fashion Editor. He replaces Karen Langley, who will start working independently from the July issue to focus on her international career, and continue with Dazed as Senior Contributing Fashion Editor.
[via fashionmonitor.com]
 
In the past few weeks, Vogue Editor-in-Chief Anna Wintour has seen her managing editor quit, her flamboyant contributing editor André Leon Talley set his sights on a late-night talk show — and now the end of her pet project, Fashion’s Night Out, the annual shopping event that should have gone ahead in September. The developments have set media insiders speculating that Wintour might be planning her own change of direction — possibly into a corporate role within Condé Nast. Wintour also been rumored to be gunning for an ambassadorship with the Obamaadministration. But a Vogue rep tells Page Six that Wintour is firmly staying put: “Each of these events are separate situations, and Anna has absolutely no plans to leave Vogue,” the rep said. Managing editor Laurie Jones’ last day at the fashion bible is today after a 20-year run at the title. Jones also spent 20 years at New York magazine. Yesterday, it was reported that the heavily publicized Fashion’s Night Out would be put on hiatus this year after a four-year run. “The decision to end FNO was made by the four founding organizations of the initiative in order to give retailers the opportunity to reallocate budgets to their individual objectives,” a Vogue rep explained. Talley, meanwhile, is said to still be continuing as a contributor to Vogue.
nypost.com
 
I'm sick of these "Anna is quitting" rumors. They've popped up every few months since I can remember. Get over it she's not going anywhere. Seriously.. Furthermore wth does other people leaving have to do with Anna possibly resigning. It's the same exact rumor written the sane exact way everytime. I feel I've read that same article a million times.
 
^ You never really know though, look at how Grace Mirabella and Diana Vreeland were both shown the door. Granted, Anna has edited the magazine almost longer than the both of them combined.
 
For anyone who wanted to catch it, Vogue : The Editor's Eye is showing on Sky Atlantic here in the UK at 9pm tonight.
 
Topshop has announced its Creative Director Kate Phelan will rejoin British Vogue. She will continue to oversee all of the areas and projects that she has always worked on at the high street retailer and there will be no change in her Topshop responsibilities. Before joining Topshop, Kate worked with British Vogue for 21 years; her new title will be confirmed in due course.

Fashion Monitor
 
I love the fact they framed the entire article around Taylor Swifts selling results.......

Best and Worst Sellers at the Newsstand
By Erik Maza

CRY ME A RIVER: Taylor Swift, looking like Carly Simon, was on the cover of Vogue March 2012. And then she took the cover of Glamour in November, Harper’s Bazaar and Cosmopolitan in December, and Elle last month.


Now here she is yet again, hair blown out, blankly staring out from the cover of April’s Vanity Fair. “Her men…her moods…her music,” the cover line reads, each ellipsis more pregnant with drama than the last.

In the world of magazines, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. One title deems one starlet cover worthy, and three more follow, typically to diminishing results. So how does Swift do at the newsstand?

The answer may disappoint those who expected her to attract the same blockbuster numbers as her records.

For Vogue, Swift sold 329,371 copies, digital sales included, which was a little above the six-month average that ended in June 2012, but no match for Lady Gaga, the magazine’s top seller last year, with about 602,000 copies. Or for that matter, Adele, the second-best seller with 410,343. All numbers come from the publisher’s statements to the Alliance for Audited Media, which may change slightly after they’re audited.

Swift did OK for Glamour in November — but with a little over 443,000 copies, she couldn’t beat reality TV star Lauren Conrad in May who was the year’s runaway best-seller (a little over 500,000), or designer and former Spice Girl Victoria Beckham in September (about 482,000).

Ditto for Bazaar — Swift sold 138,412 copies, a little above the average for the period, but far below Gwen Stefani’s September (166,365)

She had already been booked for Cosmo’s December cover when Joanna Coles came on as editor in chief of the sex-and-makeup monthly. Swift flopped, with the issue the weakest in a year that underperformed overall — she sold a little over a million copies, or 20 percent below the six-month average that ended in December 2012. Swift was even outsold by actress Zooey Deschanel, who took the dubious honor of having the year’s second-worst seller.

What worked for Cosmo? Scarlett Johansson took the top prize, with 1.5 million copies, but the August cover with Ashley Greene was ranked second, selling about 1.4 million. Was it the “Twilight” connection or the promise of “52 sex tips inspired by 50 Shades of Gray?”

One takeaway for the fashion glossies is that singers do well at the newsstand, just perhaps not those who have been overexposed. And the thickest months, March and September, continue to be reliable sellers.

Katy Perry in September was far and away Elle’s big winner, with 293,741 copies sold, but Jessica Simpson and Britney Spears bombed — they had the worst and second-worst covers, respectively.

Vogue’s biggest dud was the Olympics issue, but folks don’t come to the magazine for sports; Rihanna, also aggressively ubiquitous, followed with about 227,000 copies sold in November, or 32 percent below the six-month average that ended in December. At In Style, Jennifer Lopez took the number-two ranking for her September cover, with 756,049, after she’d already graced Vogue’s April cover, but at In Style she benefitted from coinciding with the year’s signature fashion issue. (Number one was Jennifer Aniston, with 793,588.)

So, what other celebrities can the fashion titles bank on? Newsy ones, for starters. Vanity Fair’s September issue scored with Kate Middleton, who ran away with 401,247 copies, the year’s best, and its big Scientology exposé, which featured the unhappy tale of one Katie Holmes.

The other Kate — Moss, that is — is also a fan favorite, giving Bazaar and W their second best-sellers of the year, for June (148,434) and March (27,302), respectively (The lion’s share of W’s circulation comes from subscriptions). Moss did less well for Vanity Fair, selling 277,190 in December, or about ten percent below the average.
It’s escaped no one’s attention that Architectural Digest has lately taken to putting mature personalities on its cover — Valentino in October, and Elton John just this March. Numbers for the most recent issue aren’t available, but readers showed absolutely no interest in the retired Italian, even if he was shot with his pugs — the issue was the worst seller, with just 52,514 copies. What did sell? Brooke Shields in the Celebrities at Home March issue. Elle Decor had a hit with Reese Witherspoon, selling 90,900 copies in September.

But what about Swift? Is she forever tarnished for covers?

“There may have been a little hiccup for her right around the 1-D relationship,” said Glamour editor in chief Cindi Leive, referring, for those who aren’t informed, to Swift’s fling with a member of the band One Direction. “But it’s nothing a pro can’t come back from. I’d put money on her for the long run.”

wwd.com
 
Interesting that a model was the second best seller of the year at Bazaar, while those it celebrities flopped.
 
Why would people expect Taylor Swift's February cover to outsell the March or September issues, regardless of who is on those covers? I don't think she's a flop for Vogue in particular.
 
What this article should say is that the important months sell regardless of who is on the cover. The only two numbers I was impressed with were Jennifer Aniston selling more of her issue than the Sept issue, of course we know Jen always sells and this proves it and Kate Moss being the number two seller which means she outsold March. All the other number are normal fluctuations despite what the article is trying to portray.
Posted via Mobile Device
 
I'm impressed that Lauren Conrad's May Glamour was their number one and sold more than their September issue. She's not as overexposed as Taylor Swift so it's no surprise to me she'd sell more.

I'm not as impressed with Gaga. Weren't her best-selling Vogue covers in March and September? Put her in any other month and I don't think she'd do as well.

What about Allure magazine? Are their any figures for their issues?
 
Condé Nast Adds to Job of Longtime Vogue Editor
By Eric Wilson

Anna Wintour, who will mark her 25th anniversary as the editor of Vogue magazine this summer and who for the last year has been the subject of persistent rumors about a possible ambassadorship in the Obama administration, is taking on the additional role of artistic director of Condé Nast, the company plans to announce on Wednesday.


Anna Wintour of Vogue during Fashion Week last month.

The move up into Condé Nast’s executive ranks, while ending speculation that Ms. Wintour, 63, was leaving the company or retiring from Vogue, also establishes her as one of the most powerful women in magazine publishing. Martha Nelson, who was promoted to editor in chief of Time Inc. recently, is in that group.

In her new role, Ms. Wintour is assuming some of the responsibilities once held by S. I. Newhouse Jr., who has controlled the editorial management of Condé Nast as chairman for more than three decades.

Beginning last fall, Mr. Newhouse, 85, quietly yielded his day-to-day involvement in the magazines and transitioned from the executive suite on the 11th floor of Condé Nast’s headquarters in Times Square to an office on the sixth floor, where members of the Newhouse family manage the parent company, Advance Publications.

“Si Newhouse leaves a void, inevitably,” Charles H. Townsend, the chief executive of Condé Nast, said in a joint interview with Ms. Wintour on Tuesday. “Anna, without even having to think twice about it, is the most qualified person to pick up that torch and carry it into the future.”

While Condé Nast has had several editorial directors in its history, including Alexander Liberman beginning in the 1960s, and James Truman in the 1990s, the role of artistic director is new. It was created in part to keep Ms. Wintour at the company, Mr. Townsend said. Thomas J. Wallace, who became editorial director in 2005, will retain that position, focusing on operations and developing new platforms for content.

“I would go to great distances to avoid losing Anna, particularly in the prime of her career,” Mr. Townsend said.

Ms. Wintour said that she viewed the role as “almost like being a one-person consulting firm,” advising other editors on ideas or directions they might take with their brands, much as she has expanded the purview of Vogue.

She will remain the editor of Vogue and the editorial director of Teen Vogue, in addition to assuming broader creative duties throughout the company, and having a say in its expanding portfolio of platforms, including the recent development of an entertainment division.

“It is something I do a lot anyway in my role at Vogue,” Ms. Wintour said.

“I advise all sorts of people in the outside world, and really, I see this as an extension of what I am doing, but on a broader scale.”

Ms. Wintour, like Mr. Newhouse, will be a sounding board for editors. But it was unclear whether she will take on a role he relished over the years, vetting the monthly covers of glossy magazines like Vanity Fair, GQ, Glamour and Architectural Digest.

Like all publishing businesses, Condé Nast has struggled with the continuing pressures of a plodding economic recovery and the loss of readership and advertising to the Web.

In 2009, the company closed Gourmet and three other publications. Fashion magazines in particular have cut lavish budgets for photo shoots, car services and editorial production, a hallmark of Condé Nast publications. Time Warner’s recently announced plan to spin off Time Inc. underscores what will probably be further cost-cutting and commodification of magazines in general.

“Without this statement,” Mr. Townsend said of Ms. Wintour’s new role, “I fear we could end up looking more like Time Inc. I don’t want to look like a gray-suited business.”

Last year, Ms. Wintour, who raised millions of dollars for President Obama’s re-election, was reported to be lobbying for the position of ambassador to Britain. Ms. Wintour said she was not disappointed that she was not selected, “since the talks were purely in the press.”

“It was an honor to work for President Obama,” she said. “I loved supporting him and getting to know the people working on the campaign, but there was never a long-term discussion about anything.”

Ms. Wintour said it was too soon to say what she would do as artistic director, and the company took pains to say it was a different job. It may be closest to that of Mr. Liberman, who brought Ms. Wintour to Condé Nast and who largely shaped the image and culture of the company.

Part of her job will be to look for new talent and to reinforce aesthetics.

“It isn’t about a machine or an iPhone or an iPad,” Ms. Wintour said. “It’s about people.”

Diane von Furstenberg, who has worked closely with Ms. Wintour as the president of the Council of Fashion Designers of America, said that her reputation as a chilly personality is at odds with her accomplishments. Ms. Wintour inspired the book and movie “The Devil Wears Prada.”

“She can be so intimidating and all of that, but she is just so incredibly positive,” Ms. von Furstenberg said. “And she makes things happen. She’s tough, but she’s not cruel.”

David Remnick, the editor of The New Yorker, which is published by Condé Nast, said that he would not hesitate to ask for Ms. Wintour’s opinion.

“I don’t expect Anna to be picking the cartoons or directing our war coverage,” he said. “But I have asked her advice numerous times and always been grateful for it. She’s a great editor. Period.”
nytimes.com
 
More on ^ story, its very interesting, and i certainly don't see Wintour at Vogue for much longer, CN is such a fascinating, brutal place;

Anna Wintour Expands Reach at Condé Nast
By Erik Maza

Denizens of 4 Times Square woke up Wednesday to discover they had a new pope — and it wasn’t Francis I.

For the last several years, Condé Nast has been preparing for when chairman S.I. Newhouse Jr., now 85, would wind down his duties at the publishing group. For a company whose prestige and reputation are so closely tied to one man, the question of who would follow in his footsteps has all the gravity of a papal succession.
At a time when other companies are shrinking or being spun off, the preservation of Condé’s image was all the more important. The executives in place are all money guys — consumer marketers, really, and even by their admission, unlikely to inspire the cult of personality Newhouse stoked for decades. Condé was in need of its own version of the Columbia Pictures’ logo, someone to symbolize the culture of the place as much as the image it sought to convey.


In Condé’s view, there was no one better suited for that role than Anna Wintour, 63.

“She’s maybe the greatest marketer we have in this organization,” said chief executive officer Charles H. Townsend. “What she stands for is the epitome of what Condé stands for — her accomplishment, her success, her unyielding commitment to excellence and content creation.”

As WWD reported in December, Condé executives had been looking to elevate Wintour to a larger corporate role. On Tuesday she was anointed artistic director, a newly created position that encompasses duties once held by Newhouse and, much earlier on, by Alexander Liberman, the group’s legendary editorial director. In theory, the role grants her enormous influence over the editorial direction of the company’s magazines, from The New Yorker to Vanity Fair.

What does that mean in practice? That was the question bouncing around 4 Times Square Wednesday. Wintour’s coronation was received by some as a positive development for a company that some believe had lost its shimmer as Newhouse became less involved. But there was also confusion. Save for Vanity Fair editor in chief Graydon Carter and New Yorker editor David Remnick, Condé’s not in the habit of consulting with top editors about major institutional announcements like this. So when the official statement went out, it raised more questions than answers. Will Wintour attend print order previews? How would she divide her loyalties between Vogue and the magazines she’s ostensibly been tasked with advising?

“We have a lot of autonomy as editors,” one source said. “And certainly while working under [Thomas J. Wallace, editorial director]. No one wants to see that go away. People need a little more clarity.”


“We’re not all friends here,” said another insider. “This is a competitive building. We use the same photographers. We compete for the same celebrities. This will be a gradual process as she finds areas she’d like to investigate. Why else would she take the job if she wasn’t going to do things with it?”

Wintour has been part of the Condé family since 1983, rising from editor in chief of British Vogue to the company’s shiniest star. In that time, she’s also broadly expanded the definition of editor in chief. She is the ultimate brand manager — there are Vogue-branded events, documentaries, online encyclopedias — and a power broker, one of the most influential forces in fashion, with a say on everything from the stewardship of the world’s oldest fashion houses to the industry’s place in the American economy.

What was there to do after all that? Last year, the question came up during a casual get-together with New York editor in chief Adam Moss. They were both restless, eager to do something else. But Wintour came down on the side of pragmatism, said sources familiar with their conversation. The minute she leaves Vogue, she told Moss, she would just go back to being another former editor.

One way to expand her circle of influence beyond fashion and media was politics. She campaigned and raised substantial sums for Barack Obama in 2008, and repeated her efforts in the last election cycle, hosting lavish fund-raisers in his honor. As the campaign was drawing to a close, she lobbied hard for one of the sought-after ambassadorships that are usually passed down to influential donors, such as Paris or London, several sources said.

“She already had this idea in her head that she was in a new stage in her life,” said an insider familiar with her thinking. “She was restless and she had a desire for a new adventure.”

For the last several years, Wintour’s been dogged by speculation about retirement — she’s been on the job for 25 years. But Condé seriously got the message as she stepped up her extracurricular efforts. With Newhouse playing a less prominent role in the company for the last year, there was also a leadership vacuum, and Condé risked tarnishing its image. Townsend, under particular pressure to not lose his marquee talent, started coming up with options. If she didn’t leave for an ambassadorship, it would have been something else, and that would have been an unmitigated mess.

“They don’t want her going anywhere else. If she had left, that would have been a disaster for [Townsend],” an insider said.

Last summer, Wintour signed a three-year contract that came with financial penalties if she left early. Though the possibility of a new corporate title had been discussed, by December no firm agreement had been reached.

Townsend confirmed he and Wintour had talked for over a year about expanding her purview but hadn’t come up with the right offer. There was talk of Wintour having oversight of some brands, but not all, according to sources. She had already played that role once in the past, overseeing editorial direction of several titles, not just Teen Vogue, but also Men’s Vogue and Vogue Living, two titles that were subsequently shuttered.

Townsend was aware of Wintour’s desire for a change, though they never discussed the possible diplomatic post.

“Twenty-five years is a long time,” he said. “I do think it’s almost the ideal moment to expand her horizons and maintain her enthusiasms for all the things this company stands for.”

At the same time, Townsend felt he needed a creative leader to “ensure the preservation of the [Condé] culture” in the wake of Newhouse’s diminishing role.

In January, Wintour’s path to an ambassadorship looked narrower — other more prominent donors, with experience in finance and foreign policy, had better chances. Townsend said while attending a session during the WWD CEO Summit in early January with Karl Lagerfeld that he came up with the right offer for Wintour. He saw her as playing a similar role to Lagerfeld at Chanel: brand Condé’s most visible ambassador.


“We picked up the conversation that week,” Townsend said. Then, he brought up the ambassadorship, he said, for the first time. “I said, ‘I really feel this is the right role. We’ve been looking for the right handle. The company genuinely believes it.’” But, he warned, ‘‘If you accept it, you can’t then come and tell me you’ve accepted at a later date a job as an ambassador.’”

Townsend said the new title ensures Wintour won’t entertain other distractions, political or not.

“It’s not just a title. It’s not just to entice her to stay. The equation is pretty clear. Yes, I do want her to spend her glory years at Condé Nast,” he said.

The role of artistic director is somewhat unprecedented. While Liberman had a say in every major decision, including who got to replace Grace Mirabella at Vogue, Townsend emphasized Wintour will not have direct oversight over editors and publishers — they’ll continue to report to him. Instead, she’ll operate as an executive sounding board, a role she already plays in some capacity for the company’s creative class, and for fashion’s most important executives. He compared her duties to Newhouse’s in the later years. “He was not picking covers, changing cover lines and shaping content. He was really available as a constant source confirmation and commitment to excellence,” Townsend said.

Will she have a say in hiring and firing, like Liberman did? Townsend said he’d seek Wintour’s counsel on those kinds of questions. What about editorial director Tom Wallace? He will continue to be involved in managing operational problems at the magazines, said Townsend. While the description may be vague, Wintour’s arrival could give Wallace a powerful ally in fighting the editorial side’s corner.

Though Condé is eager to underscore Wintour’s continuing role as editor in chief of its chief money machine, Vogue, few within 4 Times Square believe she can carry on that job at the same pace while also playing the part of roving ambassador. More likely is that her deputies, including whomever fills the opening left by the retirement of longtime managing editor Laurie Jones, will come under greater pressure to handle the day-to-day responsibilities at the magazine. One of her most trusted aides, Sally Singer, returned to the magazine as creative director, digital, after her unsuccessful stint at T: The New York Times Style Magazine, and was a ubiquitous front-row presence during fashion week.

Wintour will have a chance to address her new subjects Friday at an all-hands-on-deck meeting of editors in chief that had been scheduled prior to the announcement of her new title.

Perhaps many of the raging questions of what she will do as artistic director will be answered then. Or perhaps not. Regardless, Wintour is clearly Condé’s star — and Townsend is unlikely to do anything to tarnish it.

“It gives her a very wide berth to do whatever she wants,” an insider said of the new job. “And financial security that goes beyond anything we can imagine. She’s been taken care, in the old way Condé used to be.”

Wintour declined comment.
wwd.com
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
210,721
Messages
15,125,054
Members
84,420
Latest member
paulpaul
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->