Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Vintage Magazines' started by tarsha, Oct 2, 2010.
I'm more intrigued by the lip gloss than Alexa...
bad cover....I like Alexa but this one is really ugly
Same. Quite a blah cover.
Horrible cover! Awful pose and I don't like the hair in her face.
Cant help but like this, probably a sub cover though.
i actually like the pose.too bad her face is all covered by her hair
ugh i was expecting so much better but at least it's her
Definitely the subscriber's cover, with the lack of text and all. The newstand one will probably be a lot more conventional...
It's probably because of the quality of the picture that there's no depth in her dress, it looks really weird.
Preview of the newsstand cover:
I'll give them credit for trying out some new poses for the cover, but neither of them appeal to me - and it's not enough that it's Alexa Chung.
Are these supposed to be 3d or something, because otherwise I dont'see why the poses are like that. Her head looks huge in the newsstand cover.
You can't pull of these kind of poses in 2D with a black dress without shadows and a plain background without shadows. You need depth.
still not over her yet... come on!
yeah I get a 3D vibe too. I'm more interested in the free lip gloss though.
Both of the covers look extremely bad.
I'm thrilled to see Alexa, personally. It's an updated version of her October 2008 cover, very classic.
For once I'm attracted to the subscribers cover. Plus I love Alexa's hair, so I'm not bothered about it being in the way.
Ah that's nice, I like it actually. Nice to see a full body and a different pose to usual.
Just be glad it's not someone called Kate, just be glad..
I'd rather have any Kate than Alexa.