I like the revamped UK Vogue; it looks a lot like US Vogue circa 2009, but hey, it was IMO often "quality" then so I have no problem with the aping of vibe and overall aesthetic. At least it's aspirational, which is more than I can say for most magazines these days.
The fashion stories are very safe, but they are often pretty and decent enough. People claiming they miss Alexandra's era...let's not. There was nothing iconic about her work in recent years, nor the sea of white faces that felt so out of sync with 21st century Britain.
I must say though that the stories in this issue are pretty bad. McDean's cover story is very unimaginative; only Vittoria's close-up will be remembered for it's stark/Rhythm Nation-esque appeal. Venetia's story has some nice shots, but as
ellastica pointed out, some cringe-worthy art direction. I don't quite understand why she's fashion director of this mag. She's obviously played an important role in fashion in the last 20 years, but she's such a poor fit for a bigger role, working with prominent photographers with distinct styles (she, herself, does not count in the latter list LOL).
Let's not start on Willy Vanderperre's horrible couture editorial that looks straight out of Stefano Tonchi's book of high-fashion s**t, made even worse with the "look at me Ashley Brokaw/so exkluziv cast". Someone needs to pay him to go on a very, very long sabbatical. It's not 2006 anymore, it's not even 2009 for him, his work has been terrible for so long!
Thanks for the images though
!