Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Vintage Magazines' started by birdyandme, Oct 5, 2009.
Oh lord, what????????????? I expected the original Lara Stone, not her!
Not feeling anything about this cover really, her hair looks nice though.
Thanks for posting birdyandme.
I'm not a fan of Georgia and never will be, but I am looking past her I can see a nice cover.
No, the cover looks terrible. The red background for whatever reason is making me angry.
Not bad but I wish Lara was on the cover.
trying to be lara?! ... not good look
don't like this cover, styling/design looks cheap, not very Vogue UK
I can't wait when I see review
I very like this cover
The cover is OK. Lara would have been a better choice though. I hope the editorials make up for it.
I like her and I love red, so I don't mind the colour scheme or the cover choice - what annoys me is the messy jewellery.
Is it definitely her? It still looks like Lara.
I know there's written her name on the cover, but...
^Yes it's defiantly Georgia. But I'm with you on the whole wishful thinking part. Maybe Lara has December under her belt?
The cover reminds me of the 2002-2003 Nick Knight days.
I made a little research about her. Can't believe she's my age. 17
^ What she is only 17?
Could have been better if it's Lara. Still an okay cover
she could look so much better (at least interesting ) with her parents. and shes so not in time coming in fashion industrie: shes just a pale copy of Lara. she can become may not an icon, but at least successfull. and shes really bad lookin` for her age...unbridled life style, but its def. not rock`n roll.
That just makes it look like Vogue UK couldn't get the real Lara. :/
Ew I don't like this at all
Guess someone confused her with the real McCoy getting the UK Vogue cover
no, thats Georgia. no boobs- thats her, no doubt)
^ Yes I know, I meant that there was a rumor going around
saying Lara was getting a UK Vogue cover but ended up it's Georgina, I
suspect the person might have confused her with Lara.