US Glamour June/July 2018 : Anne Hathaway by Billy Kidd

Discussion in 'Magazines' started by Miss Dalloway, May 28, 2018.

  1. Miss Dalloway

    Miss Dalloway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Messages:
    25,233
    Likes Received:
    291
    Snapped by HandBagQueen
     

    Attached Files:

  2. caioherrero

    caioherrero Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2017
    Messages:
    618
    Likes Received:
    86
    Who styled this?
     
  3. tigerrouge

    tigerrouge don't look down

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2005
    Messages:
    14,987
    Likes Received:
    718
    It looks like a zine, designed to appeal to people too young to remember zines.
     
  4. Benn98

    Benn98 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    19,085
    Likes Received:
    2,813
    Much better than Melissa's cover, I like the styling. Can't get used to the art direction, but it's tolerable this time around.
     
  5. A.D.C.

    A.D.C. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2005
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    161
    I feel like Mariah in the Honey Video.. No entiendo... No comprendo?!
     
    #5 A.D.C., May 28, 2018
    Last edited by moderator : May 28, 2018
  6. GivenchyHomme

    GivenchyHomme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2009
    Messages:
    3,756
    Likes Received:
    466
    Glamour? Hah! What a joke!
     
  7. RanThe

    RanThe Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2015
    Messages:
    762
    Likes Received:
    26
    I don’t like the redesign at all! Anne looks okay. I mean she usually looks the same in all photoshoots.

    So Glamour got Anne for Oceans 8. So I wonder who got Vogue to promote the movie. Probably Cate Blanchett
     
  8. caioherrero

    caioherrero Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2017
    Messages:
    618
    Likes Received:
    86
    Rihanna...
     
  9. jal718

    jal718 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,102
    Likes Received:
    18
    They have got to regret this re design
     
  10. SLFC

    SLFC Active Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2018
    Messages:
    204
    Likes Received:
    82
    Somehow they managed to make the new redesign even worse than the previous ones that had the ridiculous text font.
     
  11. moussemaker

    moussemaker Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2003
    Messages:
    3,156
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    source: dailymail.co.uk
     
  12. Benn98

    Benn98 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    19,085
    Likes Received:
    2,813
    Stylists complain about Gucci fatigue, but what about LV? It's becoming increasingly challenging to make their designs look remotely interesting. That said, Anne looks really comfortable in these looks.
     
  13. 333101

    333101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2017
    Messages:
    1,115
    Likes Received:
    118
    It's actually a really nice cover shot, but it's all absolutely ruined by the cover design. It doesn't even look worthy of a mock-up! And I can't say I'm impressed by the styling from the editorial. Sick of the sight of those trainers
     
  14. Urban Stylin

    Urban Stylin ɐʎ ʎǝɥ

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2003
    Messages:
    17,335
    Likes Received:
    27
    I love the 70s feel though it also feels a little pasty. I love the subs edition and editorial though
     
  15. serendipity8777

    serendipity8777 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,676
    Likes Received:
    78
    [​IMG]
    Glamour June/July 2018 Digital Edition
     
  16. Benn98

    Benn98 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    19,085
    Likes Received:
    2,813
    Oh rats! The main reason why I liked the cover initially was because of that warm beige tint, now I see it's just another white bordered cover! Thanks for getting me excited, HBQ & Miss Dalloway. :lol:
     
    #16 Benn98, May 31, 2018
    Last edited by moderator Brandi06dance: May 31, 2018
  17. MON

    MON Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2009
    Messages:
    10,155
    Likes Received:
    640
    I seriously detest this new art direction. I don't see this lasting very long. Imagine spending money for this mess that won't even last a year? Its so crowded. So does this mean that all Glamour covers will simply be headshots? Whoever thought that this layout deserves to see the light of day needs some serious soul searching.

    The first photo in post #1 would have made a far more superior cover. And the new masthead really works there.
     
  18. Miss Dalloway

    Miss Dalloway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Messages:
    25,233
    Likes Received:
    291
    Hahah, no but seriously!! Wtf is this redesign? Who are they trying to appeal to? It's just awful! :doh:
     
  19. Benn98

    Benn98 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    19,085
    Likes Received:
    2,813
    This issue is out on our side of the pond and I figured I need to give the Irish lass' new direction a try just to see what it's about. As with the previous Glamour, the model casting leaves me wondering whether the models are celebs/famous people or actual models. But the styling and photography look very interesting for Glamour. Even if it's like a slightly more fashion-forward Allure.

    Anne's cover feature wasn't nearly as insufferable as I anticipated. Beyond the eternal 'yes, of course we need to talk about the pay gap, more diversity, more women's film' narrative, she comes across as really interesting. Natalie Dormer sounded way more earnest in her one-page feature, while plugging her new film. There's also a conversation between the staff of Glamour and GQ about men's reluctance to discuss #MeToo. Great idea, but since when does GQ represent the average staunchly heterosexual male? Esquire or Men's Fitness with its hyper-masculine fanbase would've been way more apt, but then they're under a different publishing group, I suppose. An in-depth investigation into why there's few women in the fashion industry highlights some uncomfortable truths, and they interviewed people from all levels which really offered a clear scope. What I did like was their way to combat the issue, instead of just weeping and wailing over the state of affairs.

    So my takeaway? Great written content, and, for Glamour, passable fashion imagery. The fashion is purely there to provide a service. Nothing more. Apparently the Glamour women doesn't care for fantasy or excessive idealism. Barry seems to have a much stronger hand curating the written content. But some variety wouldn't hurt. A bit of banter and fluff here and there. It's just so heavy and serious. Literally sighed dramatically as I finished my issue down.
     
  20. phungnam96

    phungnam96 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2011
    Messages:
    437
    Likes Received:
    96
    Is Condé Nast going to chop this magazine soon? I do believe they're slowly killing it so when it's dead people won't get too upset...
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"