Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Magazines' started by MarkPoli, Jul 11, 2017.
Maartje Verhoef by Sebastian Kim
"The New Suiting Code Calls"
Are we back to 2006? How dated, garish, and all around awful cover, and ed! Although for once the newsstands cover is an outside shot, still SMH!
Julia Van Os by Daniel Riera
“Tiptoe Through The Tulip”
I like the image of Miley for the newsstand cover but the layout is disastrous. The subscriber's cover doesn't work for me and neither does the editorial. Very uninspired.
Why is everything so busy here? The cover, Miley's edit, and the fashion content. I applaud them for going with such a nice shot for the newsstand version, but they had to ruin it with that art direction.
I don't think I could bring myself to get this issue, especially with Miley pushing her faux reinvention.
Julia's tulip editorial had a lot of potential, but it seems like the styling is wrestling the backdrop for attention. Her expression could also be more softer. Do like the shot of her running, and the one with the umbrella.
Luma Grothe by Kenneth Willardt
I love the tulip editorial!
Alessandro Michele, Dakota Johnson, Petra Collins, Hari Nef by Alexi Lubomirski
"Gucci Urban Garden"
I actually love the cover. It looks very nice and not a mess like the rest of the covers this year (to be fair, I only remember Kendall's cover and that was not good! ).
It's a total waste of Camilla but whatever. Does Miley even sell good?
I only might be interested in Julia Van Os's ed ...
This is so tame for Miley -- I guess she's changing her image.
Lovely cover. Miley looks gorgeous. Cant wait to see the full ed!
I also love Luma's and Julia's edits.
Reboot your magazine.
However, the second cover would've been a better cover. It's fresh. And I'm all for smiling covers.
The editorial... pictorial for Malibu?
very generic cover and editorial which is sad since the other eds are actually quite nice
I like most of the shots in Miley's editorial. However, the one in the sweater... is not good. The red heart dress with the flower prop is such a beautiful premise but I do agree her face should have been as serene as it looks in the other one. I love the cover though, reminds me of one of her old Teen Vogue covers.
So much artifice and tackiness! I know it's their thing, but it looks like they've gone way overboard this time. They've even managed the very rare feat of making Gucci look cheesy in a candyfloss way. Why does Michele's hairdo resemble that of my mum's (complete with cut and blow), and who pissed off Hari Nef (the model with SO MANY BOOKINGS!)? This had so much potential.
It looks like this is a floral-themed (hippie?) issue. Where are we now with their decades? I've lost track. I thought we skipped the 60's already?
I have to agree... while I find most of he edits cute there's nothing impactful about them. I've given up on them producing anything iconic though so I'll take this. Anything not embarrassing is a win for them.
God I can't stand them changing the masthead like that!!!!