Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Vintage Magazines' started by tarsha, May 20, 2010.
source | justjared via rumc
It's so Vogue, but I love it!
she doesn't smile too much here?
Is that an actual background I see? It's very US Vogue but it still feels fresh, especially for US Bazaar.
I'm going to jump on the bandwagon and say it's very Vogue. I really like it. Katherine looks very classy.
Very nice cover and has been said very much like Vogue US.
I like Katherine and this has a very classy and slightly Grace Kellyish vibe about it. The editorial also has a vintage feel.
Adding to the sound of broken records... these images certainly remind of Vogue and exude elegance. I love.
Too US Vogue-ish for me. It could've been Testino's work here.
I can imagine the meetings that took place for this cover.
Team Bazaar: Lets take some pictures of an actress who is still annoying yet isn't totally over exposed.
Glenda: Will it look Vogue?
Team Bazaar: Yes but not too Vogue. Think Vogue-lite, Vogue-esque, Voguey.
Glenda: Sounds good...a little too good.
Team Bazaar: Well we can overload the cover with text?
Glenda: I like, but we've got to go a step further.
Team Bazaar: An ugly red banner?
Glenda: Keep going...
Team Bazaar: We could throw in the fabulous at every age thing we do every month...maybe make sure that the cover text doesn't match the image color scheme at all?
Glenda: Excellent. Brilliant. Frozen yogurt for everyone!
Then there is a dance party with lots of fro-yo.
Yes. You read that correctly. They work hard and they play hard.
I think the brows are too strong for the cover also agreed its US vogueish! Love the ed though
lovely cover but WOW at the text
I feel like I'm being attacked
^ I agree with you, the text is way too much. Lovely shot of Katherine though.
I love this cover! Katherine looks great, but the text overload is way too much. And it does look like a bit US Vogue. But Katherine still isn't overtly overexposed, so I like to see her on this cover.
i'm not a fan of the cover (her eye make-up looks off) but the spread is absolutely gorgeous!
Much better than their usual covers ( except for the text overload, the same stupid blurbs, etc. etc), although, I'm no fan of Katherine.
I'm so Thankful they didn't include her costar ( Ashton Kutcher) from her new movie.
Holy texts, Batman! It's good, but Katherine is basically drowning in the texts.
Ahh. I said when the rumours of Katherine's shoot were about that she was more of a Bazaar girl than a Vogue girl currently.
It's not bad, least it's different. Hope it's a great issue...with it being for two months and all.
She looks great...not much to complain about here.
The black trench shot is amazing.
I hope the editorial content is great, not just good. After all, the magazine will last for two months, so they'd better come up with something genius.