US Marie Claire July 2011 : Jennifer Aniston by Tesh

[tarsha]

zinio

 

[Bertrando3]

It could have been a cute couple shot but it does look fake and Jennifer Aniston is so boring, still don't get why she's having so much press coverage and so many people find her so interesting when she's isn't even a great actress to start with; she's just cute, but it's not enough

 

[AD011620]

i dont even know why most of american fashion magazines even bother having covers at all... i think blank covers or completely black ones would do better... or maybe a different colour every month...

 

[Deleted member 116957]

I see Jason Bateman there as well.

 

[mechellemybell]

Booooring. :/

 

[versustito]

boring cover.

 

[loladonna]

This would be okay except they did almost the exact same cover with Bradley Cooper and Abby Cornish. These couples covers are starting to seem gimmicky to me.

 

[KoV]

Somehow I actually kind of like it. Even though Jennifer Aniston is overused, I don't hate her. I think she's pretty, honest, a competent actress and her pose/expression on this cover makes for the most natural looking cover of hers that I can think of at the moment. Jason Bateman is a god among men, so his presence obviously pleases me. I will pick this up fo sho.

 

[kokobombon]

a preview of the ed, maybe?



downmagaz.com

 

[Handbag Queen]

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz - always so boring.

 

[birdyandme]

I think the cover's cute.
The funny thing is - I actually like Jennifer Aniston - however the ridiculous amount of coverage she gets on magazines actually turns me off.
It's almost like the cover repels me from buying the magazine, purely because i'm just tired of seeing her every other month. All mags are guilty of it, but I just don't understand it.

 

[jal718]

Terrible

 

[YoninahAliza]

i dont even know why most of american fashion magazines even bother having covers at all... i think blank covers or completely black ones would do better... or maybe a different colour every month...

Lol. I agree with that statement for sure. I mean, everyone knows that Jen and Jason aren't together so why bother even putting them in a position which obviously is meant to make them look like a couple. It's just awkward. Marie Claire (and other American fashion mags too) need to step up their game and take some risks or else I'm voting for the blank magazine cover every month.

 

[MON]

I love it. Love her smile. Yes she`s overused but this is quite nice. The editorial preview looks damn photoshopped in a bad way.

Hate the "Fashion Heats Up" font

 

[SabrinaNicole]

Booooring. :/

Soooooooo boring; I read she hates her bob.



http://www.celebitchy.com/151175/je..._hair_makes_her_look_like_a_dowdy_soccer_mom/

 

[TREVOFASHIONISTO]

i actually find it charming

 

[LUXXX]

It could have been a cute couple shot but it does look fake and Jennifer Aniston is so boring, still don't get why she's having so much press coverage and so many people find her so interesting when she's isn't even a great actress to start with; she's just cute, but it's not enough

If she never married Brad Pitt and gotten divorced from him in such a spectacularly scandalous way...then she would have as much relevance as Courtney Cox--existing only on TV. Brad changed her life and she kind of owes Angelina too, because she made sure that people will care about her until death. That love triangle will be in all their obits.

 

[judelove]

If she never married Brad Pitt and gotten divorced from him in such a spectacularly scandalous way...then she would have as much relevance as Courtney Cox--existing only on TV. Brad changed her life and she kind of owes Angelina too, because she made sure that people will care about her until death. That love triangle will be in all their obits.

so true. couldn't have said it better. sad in a way, but she bores me to tears.

 

[Purpledinosaurxo]

she has such a warm smile, lovely

 

[tone]

EW! that is just terrible.