Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Magazines' started by vogue28, Oct 26, 2020.
Who except maybe Srdjan cares about the gender of her baby? Yeah, nobody. Save your gender reveal for InTouch.
Also, she looks like death warmed over here (the hair colour is terrible tbh), but I'm sure she doesn't even care about that. This is the closest she's gotten to a US Vogue cover and that's all that counts.
Thank god it’s not a proper cover!
Are the editors of the Daily Mail now working at Vogue? She's not fashion, she's just an attention starved woman and the gender gimmick further confirms my low opinion of her.
Why can't we have someone actually beautiful like Rianne? Alt really helps me keep my remaining sanity.
"Why I don't want to reveal my baby's gender?"
How on earth did gender reveals become the norm? Whatever happened to, you know, privacy?
I'd rather find out if my friend wears a mask than to know her baby's gender and when the reveal would be.
"The magic and mystery of pregnancy"... there's not that much magic and there's certainly no mystery.
Also, Kerastase pays this woman to promote their hair products, it would make you wonder what's going on with the brand.
"Why don't I reveal my babies gender?"
This might be a new low for US Vogue. At least the editorial pictures are okay.
I find those digital covers so shady... Even more when they are attributed to models like Emily. It’s like if Heidi Klum gets a US Vogue digital cover...
Does anyone cares about the gender of her child?
Oh celebrity culture!
Glad it’s only a digital cover and why are so many models getting pregnant this year
Why? Because no one cares, Emily.
Being in isolation with each other really makes things get going, and evaluate whether you want to spend the rest of your life with a person or not.
Emrata on a vogue cover? How pathetic LOL
In times of crisis, we must all decide again and again whom we love.
Stop! Vogue is breaking my lil gay heart.
I know it’s not that serious, but.... *sigh*
She's so the Heidi Klum of fashion for this generation, with the acting career of Carmen Electra.
I saw candids of her a few weeks ago and wondered why she looked better, then I realised she had normal clothes on (not 1/3 of a tshirt so her underboob doesn't go unnoticed and all that) and it immediately dawned on me that the only reason that could be happening in her feminist-but-through-the-male-gaze-but-reclaiming-that-gaze-shaped-by-men-but-by-making-it-mine world is.. pregnancy lol.
I wish they picked a better cover photo but it’s much deserved. I love what she wrote for Vogue about how most experiences in life are gendered and why she will not define the gender of her baby
Eye roll. Nobody cares.
Emily has exploited her looks and her gender for fame and fortune, than once her star starts to fade, pivots to this brand of feminism and claiming her looks are her liability. Please. Now she’s going on about gender stereotypes while.... cupping her pregnant belly, wearing negligee on a magazine cover? Is she for real?
The f is a digital edition tho? Is this just a digital cover for November or what? Didn't Bella get one of those? What a slap in the face it must be to get a digital ''cover'' only lol