US Vogue February 2004 : Natalie Portman by Mario Testino

i like it!...is the feb. edition out yet in grocery stores & places like that?
 
just what the world needed...another natalie portman vogue cover

are there no more fashionable women or does vogue serve no other purpose than forwarding hollywood starlets' careers? :yuk:
 
The cover looks quite interesting, although I absolutely hate the "wannabe sexy" look on Portman's face. I am aware of the fact the haircut is for a movie role, but she looks terrible with it... :sick:
 
She's cute, but the expression on her face is strange. I'm glad she's on the cover though.
 
Natalie Portman :heart: I :heart: her pretty face even if she's not her best on this cover.
 
Oh look, another Actor on the cover. :sick:

Are we all out of models? :shock:
 
Originally posted by mikeijames@Jan 18th, 2004 - 6:42 am
are there no more fashionable women or does vogue serve no other purpose than forwarding hollywood starlets' careers? :yuk:
I honestly don't see a problem with actresses on covers of magazines...I think they are equally as beautiful, and plus - it's what sells, and that's a huge issue. A person who walks by may pick up the mag 'cause they like who's on the cover, for instance for Natalie Portman, or Jen Aniston. However, the normal person probably hasn't seen or even knows of models, except for maybe popular ones like Kate Moss or Naomi C. I agree that's what models are there for, to I guess grace magazine covers...but they're also there to model clothing for runway shows and advertisements.


As for the cover, I'm sorry, but I just don't like it. Not a huge fan of Natalie with the short hair, although I love her with long hair. She does have a very pretty face.
 
I don't mind the occasional celeb pic. But when every friggin cover of Am Vogue is Renee, Natalie, Nicole, Halle. Its just boring :innocent: Also they don't even put any originality or creativity into the pics. :shock:

Also I hate that pic of Natalie P :sick:
 
It's not a bad cover - I don't really like her hair, but she looks pretty - I love the eye makeup B)
 
she looks cute, even her hair&make up is ok, dress is not too bad either
i mean we've seen much worst actresses on Vogue covers.. :innocent:
still is this a :blink: pillow behind her head? why not leaning on something more elegand or interesting :unsure:
imo, technically this is a bad picture for a cover

ps more models on fashion magazine covers please
 
i looove that cover! i think the model is pretty only her mouth looks abit strange..i have bangs like that too :P !!
 
i dont mind the actors... and even think it is sort of funny like models we dont need you - you dont do anything but have a pretty face and least these actors have talents.... that is just my opinion though and not that serious of one.....i do love models and think they are best on covers. her expression IS strange.... and dont like that hair. i also had a dream about her recently which was strange....
 
I'm so over Vogue its sickening. Aside from the celeb covers,the pages aren't even the slightest interesting anymore.
 
Originally posted by lele@Jan 18th, 2004 - 10:20 pm
and least these actors have talents
ahahahahahha thats funny (not offending you) so many actors dont have any talent!
:sick: this cover
its tacky putting all these actors on US vogue covers.
 
Natalie Portman has a very pretty face - I think she would look better with a different hairstyle.
 
Originally posted by tiffany@Jan 18th, 2004 - 4:04 pm
It's not a bad cover - I don't really like her hair, but she looks pretty - I love the eye makeup B)
I personally hate her eye make-up. Too strong and totally out of fashion. And also, I don't think it suits her
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
210,658
Messages
15,122,792
Members
84,352
Latest member
k3lse
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->