US Vogue February 2010 : Jessica Biel by Mario Testino

THE REAL BIEL

01m.jpg


02m.jpg


03m.jpg


04m.jpg


05m.jpg


VOGUE.COM
 
I don't like Jessica Biel at all, but I am pleasently suprised with this cover.
 
I'm shocked by how well this all turned out. When I saw the words "Jessica Biel" and "Vogue" I groaned audibly but this is actually one of the best covers they've done in ages. AGES.

Now if they'd just get rid of all that horrible text...

I mean seriously, the banner is about "the female viagra" this garbage does not need to be on the cover of Vogue
:judge:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I love her editorial, but the last shot distracts me
 
IMO, there is something wrong with her face. I'm just not sure what it is..

Exactly! :unsure:

I don't have a problem with Biel - I barely know who she is *shrug* and don't mind one way or another that she's on the cover.

But aesthetically....there's something about the eyes/cheeks/mouth that just seem so...off and really unnatural. :ermm:
 
IMO, there is something wrong with her face. I'm just not sure what it is..

I was saying this a moment ago but I think it is just that she is like a composite image of attractive facial features. Sometimes people are so conventionally "pretty" that it just becomes a bit boring, I think this is the case with Jessica, there is a blandness about her. If there was something wrong with her face I think I'd find her more interesting, I like odd features since they give a face character but she doesn't really have anything that stands out. I guess her top lip is a little large but that appears to be the fashion right now.

These pictures are very beautiful though, kudos to Mario.
 
That's an okay cover, imo, but I don't like Jessica Biel at all, on this cover either.
 
IMO, there is something wrong with her face. I'm just not sure what it is..

i totally agree. I can't put my finger on it but for sure there's something that isn't working. The last shot in the ed is so unfortunate:doh:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To me it makes no sense to have her on the cover, when there is so many young, new, and fresh starlet's out there who actually have great styles. But it has to be said that it turned out good, the cover feels honest, because they didnt over glam her, even in her spread she looks relaxed, and nice. Not evne the ugly denim styling bothers me.

The text is insulting, not just the amount of it, but what its saying, so stupid and ridiculous, that banner is cheap, and uneccessary and i despise it!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Urgh. I went through it again to see if it will grow on me. Apparently, I find the goat's face far more artistic and interesting. I hope that she just moved aside gave the goat the spotlight!! LOL! kidding.

but yes, I don't feel any sense of character with her face.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i love the image of her in the overalls it is a classic arresting image.
 
HOW COME SHE MERTIS A VOGUE COVER AND NOT ZOOEY DESCHANEL,who actually has personal style,charm,intelligence and TALENT?!?!?!? W T F ANNA?!?!?!?!?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
210,710
Messages
15,124,631
Members
84,414
Latest member
NavidNoor
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->