JPineapple
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2018
- Messages
- 2,701
- Reaction score
- 3,757
Lol, this cover is getting more controversy than Stormy's feature in Gaga's issue.
Priyanka's wedding itself was also sponsored by Amazon.
Wait, seriously?!!! A straight out sponsored wedding? Not just content with selling their wedding photos, like old school fame whores?! Damn, that is taking it to another level.People probably paid a pretty penny for the dress cover exclusive.
Priyanka's wedding itself was also sponsored by Amazon.
Lol, this cover is getting more controversy than Stormy's feature in Gaga's issue.
There is no way Wintour was aware of this, but then maybe she was, if you giving away Vogue photo approval to Beyonce, and Lady Gaga, this is the next (low) step!
Maybe Anna will decide last minute to shelve Priyanka’s cover for the newsstand to save face and will give the cover to a model.
I think Priyanka will not wear the wedding dress on the cover, which is not embarrassing.It's so embarrassing that the People cover is already out with a closeup of the Ralph Lauren dress and there is a full wedding album inside.
I think Priyanka will not wear the wedding dress on the cover, which is not embarrassing.
But yeah, this cover is just worthless now. It's already probably going to be one of the worst selling issues of this year, if not ever. If you're one of the 20 people in America who are interested in this wedding enough to spend money and not just like pics on Instagram, why would you pay close to $10 for an (outdated) Vogue when you can get People for close to half the price of Vogue with all the wedding pics and festivities. Just now on Instagram I saw on my Explore page a video of Priyanka walking down the aisle and the Jonas brother wiping a tear off his face It looks like People got some good stuff too, maybe even better than Vogue. If I was the incoming ceo and saw all of this going down, this would be a fireable offense to me.