Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Vintage Magazines' started by moussemaker, Jun 26, 2010.
screencapture from this ET video, source youtube.com
Lol... do not like it!
cover is not good, but i like inside photos.
What the hell is this? Her July 2008 is much better than this one.
Well at least this hopefully does rule her out of a Vogue cover anytime soon.
Cover is so bad, but inside shots looks nice.
Eww the cover is really bad. It's the fringe and the eye makeup.
The B&W pics looks good though. I forgot she has her movie Salt coming out.
don't really like the cover... but i'm so happy to see Angie! can't wait to see inside pics!
I like the cover, but she looks a bit like a dominatrix. I like the make-up though.
Oh no. From what I can tell from that grainy pic, she looks very plastic and too doll-like (big hair, too much eye make-up, boobs pushed up). And I hate fringes! Vanity Fair haven't produced a 'classic' cover in a long time; this is so forgettable.
like the inside B&W more than the cover - it's the feathered fringe, just not a great look on her
I don't think I can make a judgement based on this rather poor snap but Sex as a headline feels silly.
The cover is horrible.
Trying so hard to be fierce... Failed.
I mean, she looks stunning (let's face it, it's impossible for Angelina to look bad, even sans makeup) - but the cover isn't great. It's not terrible but definitely not a winner.
Iam glad Iam not the only who doesn't like the cover..she looks like a alien wearing dark eyeliner...
I don't understand why they caked her in whorish make-up and selected that tacky, depressing color scheme.
The B&W pictures however look like her best in a while.
can'T believe that will be the cover! is that a wig cause she doesn't have a fringe like that or does she? terrible...the inside shots are much better and without that strange hair!