Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Vintage Magazines' started by tarsha, May 4, 2009.
No comments, just a horrible cover choice I thought
This is truly upsetting, why, why, why???
She is so irrelevant I feel stupid even commenting...
Theres just something off about it. The only photo I like is the fifth one but every other photo is an epic fail for me.
i shouldn't have even clicked on this link...
How is she relevant enough to get a VF cover now? Not that this surprises me..
VF? Very Funny!
I like those pictures
styling is good but her lips are same in every shot
I think 6th picture is on the cover
I saw these same photos a few days ago and I merely assumed they would end up being for some magazine like Elle, or Marie Claire, but not Vanity Fair!?!?! I guess the photos could be worse?
I'm not a one for Vanity Fair. But I actually think there are some good shots up there. The first shot is horrendous, but I like the 3rd shot. The 5th shot is good as well. I think you either like Jessica, or you don't.
I'm getting a 'Mad Men/January Jones' vibe when looking at the pictures.
OMG, [email protected]@
That's really sad. They could get anyone they want and they choose this one.
She looks like something that floats around the bottom of the ocean.
at least Testino made some good pics.
so, which from the photos is the covershot?
I love Jessica, but I don't like the pictures at all. Which is weird as she usually looks good in photoshoots.
^^yes, I'd like to ask the same ... where's the cover?
She has no career, just tabloid fodder