No one would be so mercilessly harsh on her if she weren’t so reliably mid in every single image as a Super: shattering that escapism/illusion/magic of high fashion and dragging us to the reality of mediocrity/average/normal daily grind of the average person. Even if she lost weight and/or became toned, there’s just no potential in her at all with that permafrown signature of hers.
There’s a shot of a group of models, Paloma included, photographed by Annie for Vogue several issues ago, where Paloma looked good. But that takes effort— both on the part of the photographer, the creative team and of the cast. Unfortunately, the new talents that are working with Paloma, lack… talent-- and that's another topic in itself. Even Annie’s shot only printed that sole select, so It’s highly suspicious if Paloma would even be able to maintain the momentum for an entire story. She never can. But Binx no doubt would and could. And one has to ask oneself: As a high fashion vision when both are exerting minimum effort, which one would look effortlessly transcendent, elevated, immaculate just standing there.... Simply not comparable. Just look at the difference in head size alone… (Reading the comments for the i-D feature, one will understand why Paloma is so popular: Low standards of the masses represented by this woman as high fashion.)