Vogue Adria April 2025 : Paloma Elsesser by Davit Giorgadze

No one would be so mercilessly harsh on her if she weren’t so reliably mid in every single image as a Super: shattering that escapism/illusion/magic of high fashion and dragging us to the reality of mediocrity/average/normal daily grind of the average person. Even if she lost weight and/or became toned, there’s just no potential in her at all with that permafrown signature of hers.

There’s a shot of a group of models, Paloma included, photographed by Annie for Vogue several issues ago, where Paloma looked good. But that takes effort— both on the part of the photographer, the creative team and of the cast. Unfortunately, the new talents that are working with Paloma, lack… talent-- and that's another topic in itself. Even Annie’s shot only printed that sole select, so It’s highly suspicious if Paloma would even be able to maintain the momentum for an entire story. She never can. But Binx no doubt would and could. And one has to ask oneself: As a high fashion vision when both are exerting minimum effort, which one would look effortlessly transcendent, elevated, immaculate just standing there.... Simply not comparable. Just look at the difference in head size alone… (Reading the comments for the i-D feature, one will understand why Paloma is so popular: Low standards of the masses represented by this woman as high fashion.)

 
No hate towards Alex, but she won Model of the Year 2024 over Lulu, Anok and Rianne is actually quite similar
I actually can justify Alex because she walked a lot of runways and also scored top campaigns. In other words she at least worked that specific year but Paloma had scored little to no campaigns and 2 runway shows. It’s unexplainable. Plus she isn’t even well known amongst youngsters anyways. Her winning pleased absolutely nobody, in fact it made the antipathy against her even stronger.
 
No one would be so mercilessly harsh on her if she weren’t so reliably mid in every single image as a Super: shattering that escapism/illusion/magic of high fashion and dragging us to the reality of mediocrity/average/normal daily grind of the average person. Even if she lost weight and/or became toned, there’s just no potential in her at all with that permafrown signature of hers.

There’s a shot of a group of models, Paloma included, photographed by Annie for Vogue several issues ago, where Paloma looked good. But that takes effort— both on the part of the photographer, the creative team and of the cast. Unfortunately, the new talents that are working with Paloma, lack… talent-- and that's another topic in itself. Even Annie’s shot only printed that sole select, so It’s highly suspicious if Paloma would even be able to maintain the momentum for an entire story. She never can. But Binx no doubt would and could. And one has to ask oneself: As a high fashion vision when both are exerting minimum effort, which one would look effortlessly transcendent, elevated, immaculate just standing there.... Simply not comparable. Just look at the difference in head size alone… (Reading the comments for the i-D feature, one will understand why Paloma is so popular: Low standards of the masses represented by this woman as high fashion.)


Last year's Olympics had a diversity quota to encourage smaller countries to participate, even if the athletes didn't meet their usual standards. I do pity Paloma for all the hate she is receiving; she must realize that she is often viewed as a DEI hire and a token in a runway show (because designers don't approach this from a sincere honest perspective). At the same time, she is quite wealthy from all the lucrative jobs she is getting, so the criticism (if fair) is part of the deal I guess.
 
Last year's Olympics had a diversity quota to encourage smaller countries to participate, even if the athletes didn't meet their usual standards. I do pity Paloma for all the hate she is receiving; she must realize that she is often viewed as a DEI hire and a token in a runway show (because designers don't approach this from a sincere honest perspective). At the same time, she is quite wealthy from all the lucrative jobs she is getting, so the criticism (if fair) is part of the deal I guess.
(architecturaldigest.com)
IMG_9984.webp

Very wealthy indeed!
 
The illusion ordinary people have in high fashion make them believe that they have a say in it when it comes to DEI, but at the same time they are equally tempted by its strategic marketing of exclusiveness like those snobs that they don't like. I think it reminds me what I hate about the hypocrisy of the industry promoting inclusiveness while irrespectively discriminating poor people regardless their race, gender, ethnicity and other identities.
 
Reading the comments for the i-D feature, one will understand why Paloma is so popular: Low standards of the masses represented by this woman as high fashion.)


You do realize most if not all these comments are praising Binx and not Paloma right?
 
One thing I noticed with Paloma is that she always tilts her head up when she does fashion shoots! Trying to be “fierce”. I mean she kind of have to because of her short neck.
Beautiful girl but very limited modeling skills.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,743
Messages
15,236,318
Members
87,637
Latest member
subpopularity
Back
Top