Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Magazines' started by MDNA, Mar 6, 2018.
The first cover lol, they were like being copied and pasted together, with Alicia’s lifeless facial expression, wired composition and Daniela’s hideous styling, wow oh wow.
lol @ the first cover, her facial expression is really funny..
The 2nd cover is ok..The last cover is bad.
lol they're really pushing this flop movie all over fashion mags. She's still as interesting as a blank piece of paper, though, and these covers are especially bad
I prefer the last cover. She´s not the best model but the pose works with the styling, something a little "weird" works best for her imo.
Aye, when posing, she needs to be doing something that allows a bit of personality to come through.
I like all 3, wow.
Wow, just when I think she couldn't get any worse! She's trying too hard. None of her covers appeal to me, and it looks like Vogue Chine knew that which was why they gave the guy a solo cover. Just in case nobody likes Alicia's....
Oh my dear, please stop giving this woman all these covers! She is the least photogenic celebrity ever. She either looks flat or bad. In this case, she looks awful. Her face in the first cover looks like she is thinking "Please let us finish soon I need to go to the toilet." So uncomfortable! He does not look relaxed too, his only cover is not a bad shot but definitely not a cover image! And her last cover, she is trying so hard and failing so miserably: the proportions are all kinds of wrong.. her head looks gigantic and her body so small. Girl must learn her angles.
The styling is also terrible in the first cover, what an eyesore is that dress.
She's just not photogenic at all. Funny how someone can be so captivating on screen yet so void of energy and presence in print.
I actually quite like the second cover.
People have actually tried to convince me that she is photogenic and that it's not her fault that she usually looks terrible in print, but I am not buying it. She.is.simply.not.photo.genic. Even her "good" covers and editorials wouldn't be considered good were we talking about another celebrity. It all looks so awkward and that is definitely not the case for her in video.
Contrary to the rest of the people here, I prefer the 3rd cover where FOR ONCE she looks photogenic and fierce and strong and the pose and styling are cool. The first one does not work for me and the second... No cover where the cover-model does not look at the reader is successful.
Alicia's hand position in the first photograph is very weird.
The second and third cover would've worked with different poses and some cropping because the styling, make-up, and background all work well there.
The third photoraph in particular has proven that Alicia simply can't pose. She just looks so stiff when positioned from such an unusual angle.
Well,in the first cover that doesn't even look even her face.. In the third we at least see Vikander.
I continue to say that it's not difficult to take a good pic good photo of this woman:
Src: AVikanderSpain m.weibo.cn
What's with the weird arm positioning again? First US Vogue and now here.
Alicia's stunning in motion but I really don't like them pushing her in every single cover. Is there that much interest in Tomb Raider/
^Her contract with Louis Vuitton helps a lot.
All these covers she's getting are becoming irritating. Not one of them is good but she's EVERYWHERE