Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process.
More info here
it’s cute. would’ve preferred to see someone else, since it’s her 3rd Vogue cover this year but if the result is good we can’t really complain (yes, we can! )
LOL WTF is with the first select that has her looking like a stubby 10yo dressed as Jodi Foster’s character from Taxi Driver??? (As if she’s not already mousey-looking enough, let’s make her look even tinier— and in a faux-fur that’s the color of a field mouse… )
Both selects are awful. This Vogue is absolutely directionless.
It would appear Vogue and high fashion are so starved for a fashion-centric show that they're forcing it with Emily in Paris and it's really quite cringe. That and of course trying to scrounge for more Lancome ad buy-in. I happen to remember how American Vogue also tried very aggressively to push Gossip Girl and Blake Lively and it was only once she got that Chanel campaign that high fashion started respecting her.
Both covers look like editorial outtakes from a UK Glamour or company shoot in the mid-2000s which is to say cookie cutter and completely forgettable.
Ah! I do miss the Blake Lively days though. OG Gossip Girl is more relevant than any bad sequel or fashion series today. And to me the real Emily is the one from Devil Wears Prada, nothing new because there's millions memes in social media about that joke, but even her seems more interesting as a character. But well, gen Z kids deserves their own icons and tv shows.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.