^I like how you are thinking, but I don't really get much sense of a narrative on the cover. I think the most powerful thing about images is how they can provoke thought based on our own subjective experiences-but I think your analysis of the picture is entirely based on subjectivity. Not to mention, taking the target audience in to account with your analysis because this is for the target audience, the choices of hair and make up were perhaps most likely to appeal to Korean/asian beauty trends, not necessarily for creative purposes. All in all, I think she looks beautiful on the cover. I have always found Joan beautiful in print. I guess it's just how refreshing I find her beauty overall.
Re the drag comments: I think they are unnecessary, uncalled for and quite frankly, absurd. However, I am very interested and engaged in conversations regarding aesthetic beauty. I certainly think Joan looks just as feminine, if not more, as the greater majority of working and/or established models today-and that's not saying much, since there is a lot of androgyny in the fashion industry. I would not say her features are even masculine, just more developed and pronounced from what we typically see with fashion models.