True. However, do you think any designers with diffusion lines truly think of them in this light? Do most designers not simply assign a team to the diffusion line under the instruction from some conglomerate headquarters to make cheap, commercial clothes? I can't say that I've ever seen a piece of diffusion line clothing that looked as if it was the creative result of a restrictive challenge.tott said:
Alexander McQueen's new denim line
- Thread starter kimair
- Start date
j´adore dior
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2005
- Messages
- 1,683
- Reaction score
- 1
urd said:
me too!
tricotineacetat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2005
- Messages
- 2,632
- Reaction score
- 1,550
Hussein Chalayan´s womenswear diffusion is really, really good, absolutely as witty as his mainline collection, but then again, he´s not forced to turn profits as much as McQueen is theses days, I guess that´s what sets him apart. I agree with everybody´s point-of-view towards the well known, Ittierre produced diffusion lines... D&G, Just Cavalli, C'N'C Costume National, Versace Jeans Couture, all of them are horrendous, both the design and quality sucks for the pricepoint. I have had several friends buying See by Chloe, I´m not so farmiliar with their quality, though... could somebody tell me?
First, of all, I can assure you he had nothing to do with it. I will wager that it was a decision passed down to him by the Gucci group. He will not be involved in it, but he will further prostitute his name. Selling out? He already sold out, thank you very much.travolta said:
I think it's perfectly normal to critisize this. Did you read the original post? It said it will mostly be a jeans/tshirt line. There is nothing elitist about saying that this is trash. This is not RAF nor Chalayan - this is Gucci group, baby.
Last edited by a moderator:
Until I noticed the picture on the last page, I was actually hoping the jeans would be somewhat good. He did a line of denim for his f/w 02 collection that was actually really cool...definitly not your average denim. But if that picture is basically what we're gonna get from McQ then it's really gonna suck.
I'm inclined to agree with your last statements. But good tailoring skills does not a good designer make. It's precisely because of what I perceive as the utter lack of engagement from an "industrial design perspective" in McQueen's work that I've never found him convincing as a designer. Imo he'd have been better off if he'd just gone into theatre or costume design.travolta said:i think even if he doesn't care about creating affordable clothing he certainly could do it. was he not a tailor at saville row? his clothes if you strip it's opulence away are cut well and have great proportions. even his arty touches, such as the merry-go-round theme collection, could have fanastical prints on garments instead of costly embellishments. i think any great designer could and maybe should have a diffusion line, not only because it's smart, but because i would love to see them step up to the challenge at creating great clothing inexpensively. i think maybe i'm taking the industrial design perspective that such restaints are what equals really good design.
Anyway, my point was that while I certainly have no objections to him or anyone else trying his hand at a diffusion line, my expectations are very low.
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not familiar with the tastes of McQueen fans. Do you also like Prada? Or are the two incomparable, because I found McQueen's commercial FW 05 06 collection to be very beautiful, exciting and somewhat original. However, I cannot say the same for any collection by Muiccia, nor McQueen's SS 06.
Can anyone remember the first McQueen denim line called McQueen's?It was hideous as hell, all about acid washed bumster jeans and tacky polyester track tops with huge logos. I guess they discontinued the line after Gucci took over. So tacky diffusion denim is nothing new at McQueen, this time it's just much pricier...
AudiEC said:
I've found McQueen to be an interesting bridge between the creative and the commercial. I think it's because he is both a very talented designer and a part of a conglomerat with big advertising bucks. There are people here who love him and Gucci/Prada, and those who like him and Chalayan.
softgrey
flaunt the imperfection
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2004
- Messages
- 52,895
- Reaction score
- 313
tuomas said:
i remember...
i have a top actually...
l/s t...
all i can say is that it ran soooooo tiny...
i had to buy a large...and it is tight...
...mcqueen makes clothes for barbie dolls...
it's hard for real women to wear his stuff...
maybe this new line will offer some more reasonable and wearable stuff...
who knows?...
one can only hope for the best...
As faust mentioned AudiEC, there are people on the spot who like McQueen and designers like Prada, Gucci et al, I myself am one of them, and yet I absolutely hated McQueen's fall collection. I don't want easy to wear, commercial clothes from McQueen, I want drama, I want creativity, I want something that stands out in a crowd of people...because that's what he does so very well.
I'm curious to know if Lee would still have sold to Gucci Group if he could've forseen DeSole's departure and the radical changes that would come as a result....I mean, I highly doubt it, but I would like to know his thoughts on it.
I'm curious to know if Lee would still have sold to Gucci Group if he could've forseen DeSole's departure and the radical changes that would come as a result....I mean, I highly doubt it, but I would like to know his thoughts on it.
Last edited by a moderator:
Guessgirl96
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2005
- Messages
- 9,520
- Reaction score
- 0
I dont have my hopes up but I'm still curious to see it. I dont know much about his denim but theres an awesome pair of cropped skinny jeans McQueen did this season.
Similar Threads
