I love it. Its very on brand for Victoria as she does position herself as a working mum and wife, and most of her recent press, she talks about prioritsing her role as a mother and wife, as opposed to a designer only.
I also think its very of the moment, modern and refreshing for UK Vogue to have cover subjects that have depth and other dimensions to their success. Consider US Vogue's stories this year with Serena Williams and baby; Amal Clooney and Beyonce. These types of examples do provide powerful examples of women who juggle success with family responsibilities and don't necessarily have a movie or album to plug.
Lastly, the shoot and cover does have a less than perfect, fun and casual feel about it and I think it is quite fitting of the family and the ethos and brand (including their individual quirky personality traits that make them feel approachable) that they work hard at trying to communicate.
Well depends what you are looking for in a fashion magazine. I do not buy fashion magazines for the "realness" or read to about public figures success stories. I buy it for the photography, the beauty and the over the top disposable artificiality of it all. I used to be endlessly fascinated by the amazing skill that fashion and fashion magazines had of every single season creating a fantasy world out of nothing. To make people desire and pay for stuff just by wrapping it in an intoxicating package. And to do that relentlessly.
I do not understand this idea that everything has to be "relatable", it's like everyone lost the capacity to appreciate things objectively, and panic if they do not find validation in the media, if they do not see a mirror of themselves, a lesson to learn, a powerful example.
Well as the saying goes, you win some, you lose some, I used to spend a fortune in magazines, now the pile is reduced to nothing.
^ Used though? It's his choice, the man does not come cheap either.