Allure January 2007 : Naomi Watts

[moussemaker]

from www.sammie323.blogspot.com

 

[TheGlassAngel]

Awwww...I love Naomi Watts!

 

[outdoorminer]

She should've gotten the W cover

 

[ShoeGal4Eva]

love the cover and i agree ith you emily marie!

i wish she was on W or us vogue !

 

[Kanna]

I heart Naomi! What a beautiful cover!

 

[Skirt]

She looks cute, I just hardly ever read the January issue - last years was barely more than a pamphlet.

 

[semolinapilchard]

i'm sorry. but these covers could not get more dull.

 

[FashionJunkie]

I like the cover and it's different plus Naomi Watts is very cute.

 

[liberty33r1b]

she looks a bit different here...

 

[phantasmagoric]

Who are the models in the editorials?

 

[kissmesweet]

She should've gotten the W cover

I know... She's prettier and a much better actress than Sienna! Love Naomi. I first read "Naomi..." and I thought Campbell, thank God I reread it.

 

[Moofins]

^ Here here! I did the same thing!

Awwwe, Naomi is so adorable.

 

[Kanna]

She is so cute there.

 

[honeyisle]

I know... She's prettier and a much better actress than Sienna! Love Naomi. I first read "Naomi..." and I thought Campbell, thank God I reread it.

This cover is boring. I like Naomi but I'd give her and Sienna the same level of prettiness. Sienna gives better cover though...More edgy or something.

 

[SusanSuperstar]

lovely cover....she´s great!!!!!!!!

 

[MulletProof]

I hate getting into this kind of arguments but Sienna's face says nothing other than 'i'm pretty ', same reason why she acts the way she acts [on and off-screen]. naomi on the other hand seems to have compelled her great acting into the way she poses, she has emotions or at least shows something for the lense. they could do wonders for her in an editorial, I'm always wondering why they dont use her more often, I know she's not really that striking at first glance but she brings great work in everthing she does.

in short: i agree she should've gotten the W cover.

 

[min-SH]

I hate getting into this kind of arguments but Sienna's face says nothing other than 'i'm pretty ', same reason why she acts the way she acts [on and off-screen]. naomi on the other hand seems to have compelled her great acting into the way she poses, she has emotions or at least shows something for the lense. they could do wonders for her in an editorial, I'm always wondering why they dont use her more often, I know she's not really that striking at first glance but she brings great work in everthing she does.

in short: i agree she should've gotten the W cover.

Agreed.
Naomi Watts has been my favorite actress for many years. She's great on screen and so lovable(I don't know which proper word to use, she's already flawless in my biased opinion)"off" screen. And she always looks good in magazine editorials.

 

[kochie332]

celebritycity

 

[min-SH]

HQ cover:

celebirtycity

 

[LucyInTheSky]

Caroline Trentini has an editorial photographed by Michael Thompson.