Bettina Rheims - Photographer

fugfashion

Active Member
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
2,277
Reaction score
2
shim.gif
shim.gif
shim.gif
shim.gif
shim.gif
shim.gif
shim.gif
shim.gif
shim.gif
shim.gif
Born in Paris, 1952


Bettina Rheims started out photographing striptease artists and acrobats in the late 70s. Far from being simple reportage, this work involved studio-based reconstructions of the models' worlds. So there was already a hint of things to come: from the peculiar staged quality of the images, to a predilection for female nudes treated as portraits.

Published in Egoiste, these early images gained Rheims access to the worlds of press, fashion, cinema and advertising. Research and commissions then went hand in hand, and often even blended together - as is evident in her first two monographs (Bettina Rheims and Female Trouble). Strangers, models, literary figures, movie stars, transvestites, stuffed animals . . . Rheims examines all of her subjects with the same inquisitive yet sincere lens, revealing some kind of connection - even if only a gaze met - between photographer and subject.

Rheims' work is the result of exhaustive searching, happenstance and coincidence. She depth-charges the conventions of fashion photography by using non-professional models found on the streets of Paris and London, particularly ones who flout traditional gender roles - boys as diffident and pouting girls; girls as macho and gym-cut boys.

'Searching is exactly what is suppressed in advertising and fashion photography. Usually there is a person who scouts for and selects those models. All the photographer does is make the final choice' says Rheims. But she decides who appears in her work, even if that means seeking out strangers in bars and night clubs.

Rheims' 'Modern Lovers' series, begun in 1989 and recently re-exhibited in Australia, places models who display a minimum of gender identity against neutral backgrounds: just as their sex is undefined, so their skin shifts in and out of the background, giving an incorporeal effect to their being. As she notes: 'my desire was to photograph angels', but she also propels them forward, 'way beyond the image they had of themselves'.

Youth is central to Rheims' work, and her models are rarely older than 20 - they are personalities in the process of being formed. Her work riffs on debates in gender activism and queer identity, the instabilities that are mapped in cross-dressing, transvestism, and cross-gender identification: matters that, for her, question the established conventions of female sexuality.

Rheims frequently photographs celebrities, and addresses issues of voyeurism and confession, particularly in her 1991-92 project 'Chambre Close', a collaboration with Serge Bramly. This series can be seen as a work of fiction with an obsessive curiosity about women's bodies - trapped in hotel rooms with flowery wallpaper. Yet her work always returns from voyeurism to an examination of gender instability.

Rheims opened the Maison Européenne de la Photographie with a body of work entitled 'Why Did You Forsake Me'. These images - all magazine commissions - were mostly large, color portraits of famous women.

Prior to this, in 1995, Rheims had taken the official portrait of the President of France, then later went on to spend two years working on the photographic series 'INRI'. This further collaboration with Serge Bramly is a colossal project intended to represent the life of Jesus today. It is based on a close rereading of Biblical texts: drawing on original sources while seeking to combine history and legend. The series is comprised of 200 color photographs relating to the life of Christ, and a set of black and white photographs based on the miracles. After opening in Berlin at the Deutsches Historisches Museum in November 1999, 'INRI' moves on to a major world tour.

artfacts.net

Files Attached : Madonna , Juliet Binoche
 

Attachments

  • jb_1988_bettina_rheims_02.jpg
    jb_1988_bettina_rheims_02.jpg
    112.2 KB · Views: 464
  • madonnaBRheims3.jpg
    madonnaBRheims3.jpg
    99.7 KB · Views: 19
a book cover (artfacts.net:flower: )
 

Attachments

  • bettina_rheims.jpg
    bettina_rheims.jpg
    23.7 KB · Views: 31
thanks for the thread, fugfashion.
i'm not too fond of bettina rheims, somehow i think i miss her point in being provocative .... i just don't feel what it is for...

her i.n.r.i. exhibition was interesting though
from http://a.relaunch.focus.de/
HBCSAdJaaxm_Pxgen_r_160xA.jpg


for some reason i can't see the first two attchments... can everybody else see them?:unsure:
 
^ I can see them , but maybe i'm the only one :ninja:


* I don't know if I like her or not. I red something about her in a belgian Elle so I looked her up but I only found 3 pics.If you have more please post :flower:
 
So,she's sort of the female Helmut Newton...

I like the image Anna K* posted....now that's what I call "controversial" and politically correct :lol:
 
found more ...art.transindex.ro
 

Attachments

  • kepeslap_1077.jpg
    kepeslap_1077.jpg
    42 KB · Views: 17
  • kepeslap_1078.jpg
    kepeslap_1078.jpg
    31.1 KB · Views: 15
  • kepeslap_1079.jpg
    kepeslap_1079.jpg
    33.1 KB · Views: 32
  • kepeslap_1080.jpg
    kepeslap_1080.jpg
    21.8 KB · Views: 16
I like the book cover with Karen. She looks like a little girl. Cute ^_^ Not getting the pic from #5, looks very amateurish, just plain bad :shock:
 
perlefine said:
I like the book cover with Karen. She looks like a little girl. Cute ^_^ Not getting the pic from #5, looks very amateurish, just plain bad :shock:

I agree & I also don't like nr. 6 ; the idea is good but the pic is bad.
 
she had an exhibition in finland, but I never went there dispite my strong intentions
 
^wasn't it two or three years ago? Please post more of her work!
 
I agree with you guys, she doesn't do anything for me. But, this is a gorgeous pic of juliette

attachment.php
 
liv tyler by bettina rheims
from p197.ezboard.com

maga1996thef00098fo.jpg
 
her stuff is always sort of soft and sexy at the same time...

it has a pin up quality to it....
but not in a 'retro' way...
because it's softer....

and in this way...perhaps you can tell that there is a woman behind the lens...
there is something very 'gentle' about her work...imo...

* you see how the hair is always styled...
but then tousled...?...

so the women are never too perfect or 'untouchable'...
sort of makes them more 'human'...more 'real'...
i respect that...
 
Madame Figaro Rus January 2007 Renata Litvinova

pics by me

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->