kissmesweet
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2005
- Messages
- 19,655
- Reaction score
- 285
^^ The ed with Behati is very ethereal. I like it. I love the colors of the background and the scenery.
does anyone know much about the technical aspects of her lighting? she does a lot outdoors stuff but its always so evenly lit. does she use lots of big scrims for diffusion or something?
she tends to shoot in very open places, hence the even light. She uses standard reflectors (like flexfill,or lastolites) or a very small softbox handheld to open up detail in the models eyes. She is a horrendous individual to work for.
krizzlec
have you worked with her before?
or do you know someone who has worked with her?
i have worked with her a number of times.
she tends to shoot in very open places, hence the even light. She uses standard reflectors (like flexfill,or lastolites) or a very small softbox handheld to open up detail in the models eyes. She is a horrendous individual to work for.
krizzlec
I think many photographers are a bit of a pain to work for, but with good reason. They have to run a tight ship, cus if somethings go wrong, or time runs out, they are to blame. Longer shoots means model needs to be paid more, as well as make up artists, hair stylists, assistants, location fees and the client isn't always happy about picking up that bill. So if a photographer is whipping around people on a shoot, it's for a good reason. Doesn't mean they are a horrendous person in private.
I disagree - photographers have no excuse for being pigs to work for...it's the producer's job to make sure the shoot is run like a 'tight ship', and photographers at Camilla's level usually have at least 2 assistants to do all the technical and physical work, usually turning up several hours before the photographer. The photographer arrives on set with the lighting and model pretty much ready, and does their magic, then leaves everyone to pack up at the end of the day.
Working for a nasty photographer is all too common. I've worked for a-holes and very nice ones, and I'll only ever accept repeat jobs from the nice ones. You trap more flies with honey than vinegar afterall, and I hope I never become a nasty one.
Yeah, there is no reason to act nasty as a photographer. The shoots I have been involved with are probably on a smaler scale than the ones you have been on, so the photographer is usually plenty more involved in the processe. What I have seen is that alot of assistants have issues understanding their role, and they often confuse directions from the photographer as the photographer being an ***.
But this is from my brief period of assisting.
The scene over here is fairly different as well. The photographer is way more involved as there is no producers and such. I'm usually the first one to arrive and the last one to leave.....
I disagree - photographers have no excuse for being pigs to work for...it's the producer's job to make sure the shoot is run like a 'tight ship', and photographers at Camilla's level usually have at least 2 assistants to do all the technical and physical work, usually turning up several hours before the photographer. The photographer arrives on set with the lighting and model pretty much ready, and does their magic, then leaves everyone to pack up at the end of the day.
Working for a nasty photographer is all too common. I've worked for a-holes and very nice ones, and I'll only ever accept repeat jobs from the nice ones. You trap more flies with honey than vinegar afterall, and I hope I never become a nasty one.