Cato van Ee | Page 82 | the Fashion Spot

Cato van Ee

^i will buy it for sure, but i wish iekeliene, rianne and marloes were also on the cover :(

iekeliene yes, rianne yes. lara stone yes.

The issue is about rolemodels so some are in my opinion misplaced and some forgotten.
 
Guess who is in New York :woot:

Escada Fall 2010 NYC
escada08.jpg
escada32.jpg

wwd
 
Wow. this time i'll take my wors back. just wow.



scan dutch marie claire.
 
^ Didn't something like this happen last season in NYC.
She did one show show and then nothing else.:huh:
 
I mean honestly though, if she is getting contracted to do cosmetics ads, she might not need to push herself too hard on the runway. Sure, WE think it's great, but think about how many models book tons of shows but we never see their runway success translate into ads?
 
I disagree. She is just not there yet and she hasn't also the big campaigns (yes ck jeans but her photo is never made it) after two season she didn't book a big show (yes Givenchy excl but that's it). Also not the big eds. It's so quite. She herself said she would be at this season again but where is she? And the cosmetic ad. does it mean everything or just the foundation?

Maybe she is just not that special for designers? Or other girls are more special?
 
Keep in mind that the big editorial work doesn't pay her anything, but she has consistently got good commercial deals such as Topshop, Adidas...and now Clarins. Plus, catalogs like J. Crew are indicative of her being hired for other catalog work (probably a lot which we never see here). I really think if IMG wanted to push her on the runway they would find a way, I just think they have a different strategy for her.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,393
Messages
15,300,805
Members
89,370
Latest member
gothsohee
Back
Top