The cruelty of fashion these days.Wow, they really dropped Keira Knightley? End of an era.
With all due respect, this looks quite ordinary. She is beautiful but lacks presence for me. Also, what has she done in terms of films that has been interesting?
When Keira Knightley was chosen as the face of the perfume, she was a bonafide star by then, having made films like Pride and Prejudice, Atonement, The Duchess, etc etc.
They hold it on quite well for far since his death.Chanel without Jacques Helleu is borderline tacky.
Yes because Karl understood and respected Helleu's vision, he started to photograph the campaigns only after Helleu's passing. Now there are both gone, and it shows on Chanel's image, they really do need a visual editor.They hold it on quite well for far since his death.
They relied heavily on Karl and the structure he created for a long time…
He still wasn’t involved in beauty and the others activities but I don’t know how maybe through the influence of Maureen Chiquet or the Weirthemers, they worked with the people who worked with Helleu: Dominique Issermann, Patrick Demarchelier, Jean Paul Goude…etc.Yes because Karl understood and respected Helleu's vision, he started to photograph the campaigns only after Helleu's passing. Now there are both gone, and it shows on Chanel's image, they really do need a visual editor.
He still wasn’t involved in beauty and the others activities but I don’t know how maybe through the influence of Maureen Chiquet or the Weirthemers, they worked with the people who worked with Helleu: Dominique Issermann, Patrick Demarchelier, Jean Paul Goude…etc.
At first the inclusion of Meisel in the Chanel landscape with the choice of Cotillard felt like a move to an interesting direction but now I don’t know.
Dior manages to have it two top selling fragrances with the same women for years. The change for Coco Mademoiselle seems a bit premature.
And tbh, Number 5 has had too many actresses compared to J’adore.
Chanel does feel a bit tacky indeed..