Kirsten Dunst
- Thread starter zoelemon
- Start date
Yohji
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2015
- Messages
- 11,341
- Reaction score
- 3,413
Vanity Fair and HBO Dinner Celebrating the Cannes Film Festival - The 69th Annual Cannes Film Festival
14 May 2016 - Hotel du Cap-Eden-Roc - Cap d'Antibes France
Celebrity Sightings At The 69th Annual Cannes Film Festival
13 May 2016 - Cannes France
wireimage.co.uk
Last edited by a moderator:
Wolkfolk
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2010
- Messages
- 5,913
- Reaction score
- 136
Well , members of the jury are not required to go to every premiere in Cannes actually. They usually go see the films during the morning or after-noon screenings. It's easier and a better atmosphere to appreciate the film. Also if like Kirsten they have many "party commitments" at night, it's more convenient.
I'm sure we'll see more of her at premieres during the second week though.
Absolutely love all her looks so far. It's so very her. I don't know who's her stylist but she really found her groove back. She's one of the very few stars that have been so consistent lately and so personal. I can still see the Kirsten whom I fell in love with more than 10 years ago but with more maturity & elegance.
The dress at the VF dinner is another winner.
I'm sure we'll see more of her at premieres during the second week though.
Absolutely love all her looks so far. It's so very her. I don't know who's her stylist but she really found her groove back. She's one of the very few stars that have been so consistent lately and so personal. I can still see the Kirsten whom I fell in love with more than 10 years ago but with more maturity & elegance.
The dress at the VF dinner is another winner.
HeatherAnne
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2008
- Messages
- 24,230
- Reaction score
- 994
I love her messy updo at the Vanity Fair dinner, especially paired with the red lip and dress, darling.
Good point! She's always played with masculine & feminine looks, but seems to have left the former side behind. She was always the ultimate gentlewoman for me, especially to be so young and pull off those sharp tailored suits and coats, was too cool.
I'm crossing fingers that at some point she'll bring out her sharp/tailored pieces game.. she's so good at it, probably better than anyone in Hollywood and has not done it enough times! (Dior Homme suit, that navy pleated dress?).
Good point! She's always played with masculine & feminine looks, but seems to have left the former side behind. She was always the ultimate gentlewoman for me, especially to be so young and pull off those sharp tailored suits and coats, was too cool.
wickedcrazyness
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2007
- Messages
- 9,266
- Reaction score
- 23
#79 and #91 - The make up is aging her terribly. Especially in #91, you would think she was a much older woman.
Last edited by a moderator:
Yohji
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2015
- Messages
- 11,341
- Reaction score
- 3,413
I guess I'm in the minority here, but I think she looks incredible in the Marc Jacobs. I think the makeup makes her look like a '40s screen siren like Lauren Bacall.
fashionisma.com
At the Madame Figaro x Dior dinner on May 13' 2016:
kirstenimages.com
fashionisma.com
At the Madame Figaro x Dior dinner on May 13' 2016:
kirstenimages.com
vikingqueen
Away From Here
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2005
- Messages
- 785
- Reaction score
- 1
You're not alone Yohji, I really like the Marc Jacobs look. She does seem very low-key though, not as fun as she usually is on the red carpet.
Last edited by a moderator:
MulletProof
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2004
- Messages
- 28,874
- Reaction score
- 7,920
Ah finally! .. reminds me of her old Chanel picks.. and she looks pretty, maybe not ecstatic but didn't she just go through a breakup? I'd look like a walking mugshot, so she looks wonderful when taking that into consideration!
The dress at the Madame Figaro dinner is vile. I just want to grab a pair of scissors and destroy it. Who makes it?.
The Marc Jacobs dress is quite decent imo, I love the ballerina details.
I think my biggest problem about her style is that yes, it has been very coherent and steady for years, but it was about the time that started many years ago when I started losing interest... when she befriended the Rodarte sisters. I swear they have the corniest, frilliest, laziest, puritan, girly/sugary thing in fashion... and the actual construction of their clothes is so mundane. That and the Lula/Leith Clark aesthetic Kirsten has also favored for years now, it just ages anyone (which is ironic since it's supposed to be a forever 16 notion of beauty) and makes them look tired. That approach to design is so limited since it is built with the ethereal 16 year old lanky model in mind.. so if you have curves and are an adult and don't look innocent enough to be thinking of unicorns all day, putting on things that look straight out of your aunt's 1970s wardrobe is a lot less cool and kind of plain old aunt really.
I think she should wear more Chanel, or new designers. I was reading an interview with Chloë Sevigny on The Guardian this weekend, on how she's lived cheque to cheque thanks to some of her career choices (turning down the role that eventually went to Selma Blair in Legally Blonde for example), which is a bit what Kirsten is doing now, and it makes so much sense that it would impact their style as their relations with designers grow closer out of the support both sides need, but I wish she wasn't so loyal to just 1 or 3... there are so many more that could benefit her image and who could benefit from her exposure too.
.. reminds me of her old Chanel picks.. and she looks pretty, maybe not ecstatic but didn't she just go through a breakup? I'd look like a walking mugshot, so she looks wonderful when taking that into consideration!The dress at the Madame Figaro dinner is vile. I just want to grab a pair of scissors and destroy it. Who makes it?.
The Marc Jacobs dress is quite decent imo, I love the ballerina details.
I think my biggest problem about her style is that yes, it has been very coherent and steady for years, but it was about the time that started many years ago when I started losing interest... when she befriended the Rodarte sisters. I swear they have the corniest, frilliest, laziest, puritan, girly/sugary thing in fashion... and the actual construction of their clothes is so mundane. That and the Lula/Leith Clark aesthetic Kirsten has also favored for years now, it just ages anyone (which is ironic since it's supposed to be a forever 16 notion of beauty) and makes them look tired. That approach to design is so limited since it is built with the ethereal 16 year old lanky model in mind.. so if you have curves and are an adult and don't look innocent enough to be thinking of unicorns all day, putting on things that look straight out of your aunt's 1970s wardrobe is a lot less cool and kind of plain old aunt really.
I think she should wear more Chanel, or new designers. I was reading an interview with Chloë Sevigny on The Guardian this weekend, on how she's lived cheque to cheque thanks to some of her career choices (turning down the role that eventually went to Selma Blair in Legally Blonde for example), which is a bit what Kirsten is doing now, and it makes so much sense that it would impact their style as their relations with designers grow closer out of the support both sides need, but I wish she wasn't so loyal to just 1 or 3... there are so many more that could benefit her image and who could benefit from her exposure too.
Yohji
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2015
- Messages
- 11,341
- Reaction score
- 3,413
Ah finally!
The dress at the Madame Figaro dinner is vile. I just want to grab a pair of scissors and destroy it. Who makes it?.
The Marc Jacobs dress is quite decent imo, I love the ballerina details.
I think my biggest problem about her style is that yes, it has been very coherent and steady for years, but it was about the time that started many years ago when I started losing interest... when she befriended the Rodarte sisters. I swear they have the corniest, frilliest, laziest, puritan, girly/sugary thing in fashion... and the actual construction of their clothes is so mundane. That and the Lula/Leith Clark aesthetic Kirsten has also favored for years now, it just ages anyone (which is ironic since it's supposed to be a forever 16 notion of beauty) and makes them look tired. That approach to design is so limited since it is built with the ethereal 16 year old lanky model in mind.. so if you have curves and are an adult and don't look innocent enough to be thinking of unicorns all day, putting on things that look straight out of your aunt's 1970s wardrobe is a lot less cool and kind of plain old aunt really.
I think she should wear more Chanel, or new designers. I was reading an interview with Chloë Sevigny on The Guardian this weekend, on how she's lived cheque to cheque thanks to some of her career choices (turning down the role that eventually went to Selma Blair in Legally Blonde for example), which is a bit what Kirsten is doing now, and it makes so much sense that it would impact their style as their relations with designers grow closer out of the support both sides need, but I wish she wasn't so loyal to just 1 or 3... there are so many more that could benefit her image and who could benefit from her exposure too.
Well, in the past week she has worn Aouadi and Michael van der Ham, so she has been supporting little known designers... I'm just surprised she hasn't worn Delpozo yet at all. I'm also surprised she hasn't worn Chanel (besides a Chanel-themed event) or Valentino yet, but we've still got a few more events to go and maybe more.
Last edited by a moderator:
