Share with us... Your Best & Worst Collections of F/W 2026.27

Completely off topic, I agree with her about living in Bangalore as being difficult, the traffic is beyond ridiculous nowadays.![]()
The new face of Hermes, the legendary century-old Parisian fashion house, Lakshmi also features in a series of ad campaigns for Hermes with, what else, but elephants, with paint all over them, even toe-nails!
Hail the ever-exotic mythical Indian obsessed over in the wild wild west. Lakshmi sighs as she admits: “Unfortunately yes! That’s the sad part that they want to keep the myth of India being the land of elephants, and colourful women with pots on their heads intact. They are not comfortable with the new India emerging…the multicultural and global India,” she says talking of the unchanging image of the country in foreign media. “They’ve still not come to terms with it yet…there’s still wonder in their eyes.” But the 25-year-old doesn’t see herself in that mould.
Imperialism is still rampant in everyone's minds, apparently.
^^While I agree that 'modern India' hasn't fully been addressed in fashion quite yet, I don't think designers being inspired by the "land of elephants, and colorful women with pots on their heads" is offensive. I don't think it's so much trying to keep the imperialism mindset intact as it is simply being inspired by the history of India.
But that's the point -- that modern fashion very often deliberately chooses to perpetuate these old-fashioned tropes about, how shall I put it, non-Eurocentric cultures. The history of India is far more than elephants and colorful women with pots on their heads: how about the great empires of Chandragupta, Asoka, the Mughals*? The socioreligious diversity? The fact that an Indian woman wears a sari not because it's this quaint, primitive garb, but because it has a rich sartorial history and significance?
*I felt that McQueen's F/W 08 collection was certainly inspired by the British Raj
To briefly continue the off-topic thread of conversation: god, it was terrible back when I visited in '03 -- I can't even imagine how it is now! I hear the out-of-control/poor city-planning is greatly to be blamed for this.
I agree. What I meant, was that I don't think designers being inspired by the history of India is offensive or done with the intent to ignore the growing, modern India...I think it's simply being inspired by the beauty of a culture, past or present.But that's the point -- that modern fashion very often deliberately chooses to perpetuate these old-fashioned tropes about, how shall I put it, non-Eurocentric cultures. The history of India is far more than elephants and colorful women with pots on their heads: how about the great empires of Chandragupta, Asoka, the Mughals*? The socioreligious diversity? The fact that an Indian woman wears a sari not because it's this quaint, primitive garb, but because it has a rich sartorial history and significance?
*I felt that McQueen's F/W 08 collection was certainly inspired by the British Raj
I agree. What I meant, was that I don't think designers being inspired by the history of India is offensive or done with the intent to ignore the growing, modern India...I think it's simply being inspired by the beauty of a culture, past or present.
Plus, JPG has been inspired by more than British Imperialism when it comes to India...for SS 02 he did a collection based on Buddhism.
.
One of my favourite campaigns of the past months for sure 
She's so, so beautiful. I like that Givenchy is using her as a model, not just an Indian model; what I mean is, she's not advertising an Indian-themed or Indian-flavoured collection.

I agree type-casting (ie. Indian model for Indian themed collection) happens far too often and mostly with models of colour.