Originally posted by Scott+May 19th, 2004 - 10:00 pm--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Scott @ May 19th, 2004 - 10:00 pm)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by Orochian@May 19th, 2004 - 7:46 pm
<!--QuoteBegin-mode_addict
@May 19th, 2004 - 11:46 am
it's just so hard to get my hands on things when i live in sf. we're so deprived.
Come to Toronto, and you'll know the real meaning of deprived.
But yeah, I can't think of a better place for shopping than NYC.
And faust, have fun in SF!
Please,come any where near the south you'll be reaching the parameters of the near derelict....you wanna talk deprived!?
O*,I so hope you mean in North America? Its really funny,in almost every major European city there are gorgeous shops filled with an array of almost everything...yet here its very limited and mostly to the advantage of NYC. And what I mean by that is,in most cities one or two good shops and that's about the jist of it. [/b][/quote]
Thanks, Orochian, we had a great time.
Scott, you are right about NYC dominating the retail scene (especially men's), but I had a VERY pleasant surprise when we discovered a store called Cielo in SF. They only carry women's, but what a selection!!! I finally got to see Lutz stuff in person - really beautiful, and I don't know anyone who carries Lutz in NYC. They also have an awesome selection of Ann Dem (they still have THE boots!), Dries, Ann-Valerie Hash (sp?)etc... Anyway, a bit off topic.
Unfortunately, it's the North American aesthetic (or lack of) that is responsible for the retail trends. If there is no market, there is no product, which is self evident. US retail market is much more about the lables than the clothes itself. I've met with store owners that hate Prada but have to carry it to stay afloat. A. started out as a both women's/men's store, but they couldn't sell the likes of Sophia Kokosolaki, Ann-Valerie Hash and Angelo Figus, so they made the store for men only.