Lily Cole

[Day]

I like some of them, but others...not so much. Some are a little too straightforward lol

 

[xmodel citizen]

I would like them if it weren't for the expression on her face. It makes them feel like child p*rn!

 

[redonblack]

she looks like Eve

 

[ninanina19]

Her body is so freaking perfect and I can't believe how long her legs are. Actually, despite the poses I don't think she looks vulgar at all.

 

[|PerfectTonight|]

Lily the perfect porcelain doll, a breeze of elegance and eternity, just isn't meant to do semi-p*rno pictures shot by a perv photographer. He's a freak and having Lily in a context, exploating herself like that (especially that pose from the back) is pretty discusting. It cheapens her and makes her look like a naked child!

On the side note; her body is amazing, a wonderland. Her breasts especially.

*correction*

 

[xmodel citizen]

^ They're actually by Juergen Teller but I agree. It's exploitative and disgusting! What sort of person sets out to make photos look like child p*rn*gr*phy??

 

[Atelier]

Sort of reminds me of Bruno Dumont's Twentynine Palms. Actually it's not bad at all.

 

[violet_echoes*~]

I would like them if it weren't for the expression on her face. It makes them feel like child p*rn!

Oh my goodness.. I was wondering what to think of these and then when I saw this comment I am thinking you hit the nail on the head.

Her naturality in the outdoors shots is near goddess-like ~ reminds me of her Venus shots, and there she is exactly as a wood nymph would look and it appears almost as though her image has been captured by a photographer afraid to get too near incase she darts off like some kind of rare creature... BUT when it's taken indoors, all the preciousness is replaced by a very spooky clinical feeling, and the nudity kind of hits you a bit.

 

[rebellion]

That is a LOT more of Lily than I really wanted to see.

 

[Lily530]

I think they're very natural and beautiful. The female body in it's pure form. It's not as if she is spreading her legs wide open.

 

[matthaeus123]

The *** shot one is a bit too much. It changes from art to pr0n.

 

[alxxxfast]

The *** shot one is a bit too much. It changes from art to pr0n.

maybe is not the best piece of art,
but for sure is a lot distant from p*rn*gr*phy,
it's just a nude girl

 

[Nemezide]

omg this is too much
i dn't like it at all
it looks like child p*rno

 

[rouge_red]

Is she gonna be the new Lara Stone

No. Lara makes provocative shoots, not sth like this.

Well. What can I say? I think it's not (child) pornish. Cause this lady has definately the most amazing body that has nothing in common with a young girl.
But I do not like the shots on the bed. I dunno, those are really a bit creepy. Those in the landscapes... well. Interesting I guess. And simply very beautiful. [you can say what you want - to me, the pics are beautiful. just a bit too intimate. I feel somewhat like a lover looking at her for the very first time, you know?]


Well, after all, i agree with Lily530. It's beautiful, feminine, natural.

 

[PrincesseDaria]

flickr

 

[matthaeus123]

Lily featuring clothes

 

[min-SH]

i dont find the pix p*rn-ish at all, instead, i find her looking quite Goddess-ish there.

 

[wickedcrazyness]

i don't like those pictures. they look like p*rn... especially the bed shots

 

[rebellion]

To me they don't really look like p*rn, they're just a bit too blatantly....naked.

 

[xmodel citizen]

They look like amateur p*rn. Very bad, 70s amateur p*rn to be specific. That wall shot is so haunting. The look in her eyes makes me sick