This is so true! But designers are designing nowadays solely to respond to demand, in order to sell and the system commands that. It's so sad, because so much creativity is being lost. But Nicolas is the exception, he always does his thing, no matter what the world is demanding.I still think the work of a designer is to provoke a desire and not (always)respond to the demand.
For me his balenciaga from 2000 -2008 was sharp - from 2009 he went into this playmobil french futuristic side he never left since coming to LV even if his first few shows at LV had some of the sharpness in silhouette as early balenciaga work with a touch of effortless attitude but wearing experimental clothes .....i understand your feeling it could be much better i miss the more dark edge of early work but i understand LV is a big beast to cater to allot of people most don't know or care he is even there and that's fair as well .....i do think his extreme forward laboratory future approach helps such a commercial brand stay edgy and product at the entry level to top benefit form all his work on details he put in the collections and hardware used on bags get that modern touch because of his obsession with futuristic ideas and styles.As much as I loved Ghesquière and as much as he will always be one of my cherished fashion heroes, I never got the appeal of what he has done at Vuitton. It is not chic. I find it quite gimmicky and uninspired. 0 refinement. It is like he doesn't care about fashion that much since he left Balenciaga.
With these big designers from the 00s I feel that once they got super rich, they kind of left fashion aside and started enjoying life.