LVMH - The Luxury Goods Conglomerate

interesting to see they're trying to sell Marc's label, it's been in the financial doldrums ever since they got rid of Marc by Marc (which was actually a good diffusion line and had a point of view that wasn't just 'cheaper') and I assumed that new merch line Heaven had put them back in good shape but apparently not as good as I thought?
 
interesting to see they're trying to sell Marc's label, it's been in the financial doldrums ever since they got rid of Marc by Marc (which was actually a good diffusion line and had a point of view that wasn't just 'cheaper') and I assumed that new merch line Heaven had put them back in good shape but apparently not as good as I thought?
Marc is profitable again. It’s making good money But it’s not a luxury brand. There’s no perspective of growth in that eco-system without a large distribution.

Marc was already too big anyway. It’s not Kenzo or Patou.

I can see them getting rid of Marc as soon as Celine, Loewe and Fendi reach very good numbers. MJ can be sold at a good price…above 500 M for sure!
 

Snap French elections leave Bernard Arnault high and dry​

LVMH CEO Bernard Arnault has no interlocutors within the two strongest political camps ahead of snap French legislative elections called for 30 June and 7 July.

LVMH CEO Bernard Arnault has no interlocutors within the two strongest political camps ahead of snap French legislative elections called for 30 June and 7 July. © Studio Pachamama

President Emmanuel Macron's surprise move to call French parliamentary elections early has put LVMH's founder and CEO in a very uncomfortable position. The billionaire boss is being explicitly targeted by a newly formed left-wing coalition, and he has very few allies on the far right. [...]
Published on 20.06.2024 at 05:00 GMT
 
MISS TWEED
After the “handbag war,” the watch war
Astrid Wendlandt
23/06/24

1719339823906.png

A little over a decade ago, the luxury industry was gripped by the "handbag war" between LVMH and Hermès when Bernard Arnault's group tried to seize control of the maker of the prized Birkin handbags and was eventually forced to give up. Now a watch war could be afoot.


The two luxury powerhouses are bidding for Vaucher Manufacture Fleurier, the Parmigiani watch brand and other suppliers part of the watchmaking hub put up for sale several months ago by their owner, the Sandoz Family Foundation, industry sources say. Cartier owner Richemont has also expressed interest, they say, but the Swiss group is much less motivated than LVMH and Hermès because it has sufficient production capacity and strong ties with suppliers.


Earlier this month, executives from LVMH, Hermès and Richemont met with the management of the businesses put up for sale, one by one, industry sources say. "Initial bids are expected to be made this month and hopefully a deal will be announced before the end of the summer," one person with knowledge of the sale process said. Deloitte is advising the Sandoz Foundation. LVMH and Hermès declined to comment. Richemont could not be reached for comment.


For many weeks, Hermès appeared to be the best positioned since it already owned 25 percent of Vaucher, a highly regarded provider of watch movements. Hermès is said to have ploughed more than €120 million into the company since it became a shareholder in 2006. The French luxury company has right of first refusal to buy the shares it does not already own in Vaucher.


Publicly, Hermès has never denied its interest in buying the whole company. In an interview with Swiss daily Le Temps in April, Guillaume de Seynes, a member of the Hermès family who has been in charge of the group's investments in watchmaking since the beginning, said: "I can confirm that we are not uninterested with what will happen to Vaucher." Vaucher supplies all the mechanical movements of Hermès' watches, de Seynes told the newspaper. For him, letting go of Vaucher is not an option. Hermès has spent a lot of time and money trying to keep this company financially afloat and building a relationship with it. Losing ties with Vaucher would be unthinkable for de Seynes. It's his battle.


Vaucher is vital because it gives Hermès legitimacy in watchmaking and plays an important part in the narrative. If LVMH were to win control, Hermes would find itself in a difficult position. It's not clear how the two would work together. While Vaucher is part of the Sandoz Foundation, the French luxury company can say that its movements are made in-house. If LVMH took charge, it may not allow the company to say they are made in-house and even worse, it may not agree to supply Hermès with movements.


BAD BLOOD



There is still quite a lot of bad blood between the two groups. Memories of the acrimonious 2010-2014 "handbag war" are still fresh. Hermes fought tooth and nail to rebuff LVMH's attempt to gobble up the luxury company. "I think Hermès is going to do all that it can to prevent LVMH from taking control of Vaucher," the executive of one major watch brand told Miss Tweed on condition of anonymity.


If LVMH succeeded in buying the whole watchmaking hub of the Sandoz Foundation, Hermès could take the group to court on the basis that its right of first refusal was not honored, some industry sources say. The two groups would cross swords again. That would not be good news for investors as it would create an unwelcome distraction for both groups' management at a time when the industry is facing an unprecedented downturn and everyone needs to be on deck to navigate the storm as best as they can.


Hermès is not the only one concerned about LVMH's interest in Vaucher. Audemars Piguet and Richard Mille are also worried. LVMH calling the shots at Vaucher is not a particularly palatable option for them either since they are major customers of the movement provider.


Hence, Audemars Piguet and Richard Mille could likely join the fray against LVMH.
Audemars Piguet owns a minority stake in Richard Mille, which means that their interests are aligned.


Part of the Sandoz watchmaking hub is Atokalpa, a provider of key elements such as balance wheels and springs, and its sister company Elwin, which supplies hardware for mechanical movements. Patek Philippe and Chopard are shareholders in both companies.


"It's pretty clear to me that Atokalpa is strategic also for Patek Philippe and Chopard," another senior watch executive said. "They will not want to let LVMH get control of it."


Hence, a consortium opposing LVMH's bid to buy the whole watchmaking hub of the Sandoz Foundation is forming. Watchmakers are more relaxed working with Hermès than with LVMH, Swiss watch industry sources say.
The latter group's financial resources are gigantic. Bernard Arnault's philosophy is that the end justifies the means. It's nearly impossible to counter LVMH's might and plans.


Unlike LVMH, Hermès is not on the prowl to expand its empire. The French luxury company is working on securing its supply chain and continuing to build its watch business.

Rival big brands feel more comfortable with that strategy than with LVMH's ambitions.


RISING STAR


In the past few years, Hermès has been introducing more high-end pieces costing more than €12,000, paying great attention to design. "I think Hermès really defined its soul in watchmaking," the CEO of one medium-sized Swiss watch brand told Miss Tweed. "They have found their place in the watchmaking industry and created very nice products."


De Seynes told Le Temps that the average price of its watches had risen from €3,000 to €10,000 in the past five to six years. At the Watches & Wonders trade fair last April, Hermès presented a new genderless model called the Hermès Cut, with a new movement designed specifically for it, as well as a triple-axis tourbillon coupled with a minute repeater called Arceau Duc Attelé costing €400,000.


Hermès is a rising star in the Swiss watch industry. Last year, it made €611 million in watch sales, up 23 percent at constant exchange rates, higher than the brand's overall sales growth of 21 percent. In the first quarter, watch sales were up 4 percent - a feat in a declining market. Hermès makes around 75,000 watches a year. A significant proportion are still equipped with quartz movements and they cost between €2,000 and €3,000. Its timepieces are sold in its more than 300 stores and at some 100 wholesalers, the brand says.


Hermès has been trying to buy Vaucher Manufacture for years. But now it has to counter competition from LVMH, which is also keen to invest in movement providers. The French group harbors great ambitions in watchmaking. Several industry sources said LVMH was on the lookout for more suppliers than just Vaucher.


"We see a lot of LVMH people in Switzerland attending fairs, bonding with key players and their M&A teams are scouting for acquisition opportunities," the head of one small independent brand told Miss Tweed. "They are in 'attack' mode."


Industry sources said LVMH offered €4 billion for Swatch Group's Breguet a few years ago but the Hayek family would not let go of it. LVMH and Swatch Group never commented on this fact.


TAG HEUER


Frédéric Arnault, CEO of LVMH's watchmaking division and third son of the group's chairman and CEO Bernard Arnault, is looking for ways to increase production and the quality of movements, particularly that of TAG Heuer. LVMH also owns Zenith and Hublot which, like TAG, have their own in-house movement providers.


Carole Forestier-Kasapi, in charge of movement development at TAG Heuer, told Le Temps in May that Vaucher was the "best provider" of movements with complications - additional functions than the time. At Watches & Wonders, TAG Heuer presented a new Monaco Split-Seconds Chronograph supplied by Vaucher. Some industry experts argue that this watch was more a marketing coup than a timepiece aimed to be produced in large quantities. Priced at 165,000 Swiss francs, every item will be numbered, the brand said at the time of its presentation.


TAG Heuer's spokeswoman did not reply to a request to comment on that point. Jean Arnault, Bernard Arnault's fourth and youngest son, is in charge of watches for Louis Vuitton and relaunching the brands Gérald Genta and Daniel Roth, using the group's plant La Fabrique du Temps. Jean and Frédéric Arnault may be keen to grow further Parmigiani, which is also for sale and part of the Sandoz Foundation watchmaking hub.


PARMIGIANI


Parmigiani is not a big player in the industry. Last year, it is estimated to have generated just over 65 million Swiss francs in revenue in 2023 - up from 26 million Swiss francs in 2019 - and aiming for further steady growth this year. The watchmaker is still burning a little cash but at least it is breaking even, several sources said.


Under the leadership of Guido Terreni since early 2021, Parmigiani has enjoyed a revival. The brand has narrowed its focus on its best-selling model, the Tonda PF, which has a minimalist and recognizable integrated design. Steel models start at around 20,000 Swiss francs.


Parmigiani has benefited from a shortage of popular models such as AP's Royal Oak and Patek Philippe's Nautilus which cost about the same and have similar designs.


Consumers bought a Parmigiani Tonda PF instead, watch retailers say. Parmigiani is distributed mainly by third-party retailers. It has not invested in its own network of boutiques.


Hermès, on the other hand, may not be that interested in Parmigiani since its strategy is to focus on growing its own watch business. However, both Hermès and LVMH have the means to write big cheques. At the end of 2023, Hermès was sitting on a net cash pile of more than €10 billion while LVMH had €7.7 billion. Comparatively, Richemont had a net cash position of €7.4 billion as of March 31.


In the course of the past decade, most major watch brands have been investing in the development of their own movements and production capacity. Having your own movement makes your timepiece more unique and allows you to charge more for it. Watchmaking is very capital intensive. It requires a lot of money and time to develop a movement, often several years.


Also part of the Sandoz Foundation's watch producing hub is Quadrance & Habillage, a specialist maker of watch dials with expertise in guilloche and engraving. The watch suppliers work for many of the world's top watch brands. Together with Vaucher Manufacture and the other suppliers part of the hub, they employ more than 500 people, spread between Alle in the canton of Jura, La Chaux-de-Fonds and the Vallée de Joux, three of Switzerland's most important watchmaking clusters.


The Foundation already tried to find a buyer for its watchmaking hub several times, including once three years ago, but discussions failed to produce a deal. The Foundation is understood to have lost more than 1 billion Swiss francs since it started investing in Parmigiani and its various suppliers 30 years ago. The descendants of the family behind the Foundation are keen to get as much back as possible.


(Edited by Samantha Berkead, illustration by Claire Laude, www.claire/aude.com)
 
Bernard Arnault has taken a personal equity stake in Richemont:
Op-Ed | Could LVMH Buy Richemont?
Acquiring Richemont would catapult LVMH into a completely different stratosphere to the rest of the luxury industry, writes Andrea Felsted.

By BLOOMBERG
26 June 2024

BoF PROFESSIONAL

So now we know.

In January, Bernard Arnault sang the praises of Cartier owner Cie Financiere Richemont SA. He also quipped that if its chairman Johann Rupert wanted “support to maintain his independence, I’ll be there.” It was an odd thing to say — and had luxury watchers wondering what he had in mind.

On Tuesday, we got the answer. Bloomberg Businessweek reported that Arnault had taken a personal equity stake in Richemont.

It’s unclear exactly how many shares the LVMH chairman and chief executive officer has acquired. Bloomberg News described the holding as small and just one of many similar stakes that Arnault intended to own only as an investment. Both companies declined to comment.

But Richemont rose as much as 4 percent on renewed speculation that Arnault has his sights on the luxury conglomerate, which also owns Van Cleef & Arpels.

Acquiring Richemont would catapult LVMH into a completely different stratosphere to the rest of the luxury industry. In jewellery, it would combine Richemont’s Cartier and Van Cleef with LVMH’s Tiffany and Bulgari, creating a so called “hard luxury” powerhouse. Add in Louis Vuitton, the world’s biggest luxury brand, and sister Dior, and Arnault would be even more dominant.

And he could afford it too. Assuming the standard 30 percent premium, the target would be valued at about 111 billion Swiss francs ($124 billion). At a probably more realistic 50 percent premium, the potential price would be closer to 130 billion Swiss francs.

Even for LVMH, which has a market value of about $400 billion, paying in cash would be a stretch. But it could use a mixture of cash and shares. And Kering SA, which had looked like the better partner for Richemont, is busy turning around Gucci and integrating several acquisitions.

There may be competition concerns in some markets about an LVMH Richemont tie-up. But the main hurdle would be Rupert.

He holds about 10 percent of Richemont’s equity and 51 percent of the voting rights. What’s more, he has consistently insisted the company is not for sale. In fact, he said in 2023 that he decided against a deal with Kering two years earlier. And he has a strong hand to resist any overtures from Arnault.

Shares in Richemont are up about a quarter this year, while LVMH stock is flat — evidence that amid an uncertain luxury market, some investors prefer exposure to jewellery over leather goods.

Typically in tough times, “it bags” outperform watches, bangles and earrings. But prices of handbags have soared over the past few years. This makes the likes of Van Cleef necklaces and Cartier Love bracelets better value for money than purses. What’s more, as the cost of jewellery hasn’t risen so sharply, there is a deeper reservoir of potential price increases to tap over the next few years.

As at LVMH, where Arnault’s children are in the business, there will eventually be questions of who succeeds Rupert.

He has answered these — in part — with the appointment of Nicolas Bos, the head of Van Cleef, as Richemont’s new CEO from the start of this month. Rupert has handed over some management responsibilities to Bos, but remains as executive chairman. At 53, Bos could remain as CEO for some time, before eventually succeeding Rupert as chairman. Rupert has said that his son Anton will not take an executive role, but that may not preclude him from becoming non-executive chairman.

If Arnault has taken the stake in Richemont as simply an investment, then it’s a shrewd one. But if the so-called Wolf in Cashmere is licking his lips at the prospect of a deal, he will need the cooperation of the Kingmaker in Cartier.

By Andrea Felsted
BoF
 
miss tweed.com

ALESSANDRO VALENTI BECOMES CEO OF GIVENCHY


Sometimes it takes the threat of separation to become closer. Alessandro Valenti, a top Louis Vuitton executive was about to join Gucci when LVMH came up with a job offer he could not refuse: CEO of Givenchy.
Valenti, Louis Vuitton's President of Europe, Middle East and Africa, was part of the LV minibus en route to Gucci when LVMH stopped him in the middle of the road and asked him to turn around and come run Givenchy. Valenti was going to look after the Italian brand's retail activities, sources close to Kering said.

Stefano Cantino, who was VP of communication and events at LV, became deputy CEO of Gucci in May after LVMH asked him to leave, as Miss Tweed reported. Cantino is being groomed to replace CEO Jean-François Palus who could leave as early as next year, people close to Gucci say.


Givenchy needed a new CEO and designer. It has been without a creative director since Matthew Williams left at the beginning of the year. It's usually better to start with the CEO since he or she is going to be one crafting the strategy for the brand with LVMH. Once the roadmap is clear, they know what kind of designer they are looking for.


The French fashion brand has interviewed many people but up until now, no one seems to fit the bill.
Hiring the right designer is Valenti's No. 1 priority. Alessandro's "extensive knowledge of the luxury industry, including more than ten years at Louis Vuitton, coupled with his retail expertise and managerial skills, will be key assets in taking Givenchy to reach new milestones," Sidney Toledano said in the LVMH press release about Valenti's nomination.


Toledano? LVMH still refuses to confirm Toledano is back as CEO of Fashion Group, replacing Michael Burke who left abruptly a few months ago, as Miss Tweed and many other media reported. Yet, Toledano signs off press releases! The group described Toledano as "chairman of the Givenchy board."


Valenti will need to decide what kind of Givenchy LVMH wants: a couture or a more rock-chic brand. This is a debate on which Miss Tweed has written extensively. Founded by Hubert de Givenchy in 1952, Givenchy embodies a mission impossible for any CEO: making a historic brand relevant again when it does not have much in terms of heritage but a little black dress, once advertised by Audrey Hepburn. Good luck Alessandro!
 


LVMH investors demand more action from DIOR in subcontractors controversy​

Posted On July 23, 2024 CPP-LUXURY

Europe’s top asset manager Amundi and other LVMH investors want the $370 billion luxury behemoth controlled by billionaire Bernard Arnault to take more aggressive steps to monitor its suppliers’ treatment of workers after Italian prosecutors disclosed alleged sweatshop-like conditions at subcontractors for high-end brand Dior, three investors told Reuters.
The investigation into suppliers for Christian Dior Couture, LVMH’s second-largest fashion label, which Reuters revealed on June 11, has shone a spotlight on potential worker exploitation in the $1.6 trillion global luxury goods industry.


Amundi, which holds a 0.6% stake – worth $2.2 billion – in the Paris-listed parent to brands including Louis Vuitton and Tiffany & Co., said it contacted the French conglomerate after the investigation was made public, asking for more transparency on supplier audits and internal purchasing practices.
“We hope that these recent allegations will be looked at seriously and will speed up the improvement, within the sector of policies and practices to ensure proactive management of supply chain risks including those around working conditions,” Caroline Le Meaux, global head of ESG research, engagement and voting at Amundi, told Reuters on July 18.

CCLA Investment Management, an LVMH investor, told Reuters it wants the company to provide more public evidence of its efforts to ensure workers in its supply chain are fairly paid, while asset manager Robeco said it has been pushing luxury groups including to be more transparent.
Reuters spoke with four investors holding shares in LVMH after a Milan court placed an Italian subsidiary of Dior under judicial administration following the investigation into the supply chain of Dior and a dozen other fashion brands.
Flavio Cereda, co-manager of GAM’s luxury brands investment strategy, said it is no longer acceptable for brands to say a product is made in Europe and that they need to show they are “on top of (their) supply chain because in the end it falls on (them).”

Amundi leads engagement with LVMH on fair wages on behalf of the Platform Living Wage Financials (PLWF), a group of large investors including Legal & General Investment Management and Storebrand.
 

BOF​

LVMH Pledges More Vertical Integration in Response to Dior Manufacturing Scandal​

The luxury giant said it will aim to bring more production in house after an Italian investigation linked Dior to sweatshop conditions.

A craftwoman works on a chest at the Louis Vuitton leather work factory in Juilley, western France.

LVMH is planning to bring more manufacturing in house following a supply chain scandal. (Loic Venance/AFP via Getty Images)

23 July 2024

LVMH will double down on efforts to control working conditions in its supply chain and intensify its strategy of vertical integration in the wake of an Italian investigation that linked Dior to sweatshop labour, chief financial officer Jean-Jacques Guiony said Tuesday.

The luxury giant said it was unaware of the issues in its supply chain, despite ongoing efforts to increase auditing and monitoring of external manufacturers.

”We accept full responsibility for what happened,” Guiony told analysts on a call for the company’s first-half earnings. “We thought we were doing quite a lot already and we will intensify.” In particular, LVMH will look to increase vertical integration at Dior, which outsources more of its production than flagship label Louis Vuitton.

”This strategy didn’t begin yesterday; we’ve been implementing it for quite a while and will continue to do so and hopefully intensify and make it faster than we had in mind,” Guiony said. “That’s not easy to do, but the current situation requires further investment on that front.”

LVMH has faced mounting pressure to address the scandal since it was first swept up in a labour exploitation probe led by prosecutors in Milan. Armani has also faced sanction for failing to adequately monitor its supply chain and actions against more fashion companies are expected to follow in the coming months. Last week, Italy’s Competition Authority said it was conducting its own investigation into whether Dior and Armani misled consumers with commitments to ethics and craftsmanship.

Earlier on Tuesday, Reuters reported that some investors are pushing for LVMH to do more to address the issues.
 
Marc is profitable again. It’s making good money But it’s not a luxury brand. There’s no perspective of growth in that eco-system without a large distribution.
Marc Jacobs has been reduced to the “downtown” version of Coach. All the women who used to carry an MK or Tory Burch bag two years ago now carry that ubiquitous “The Tote Bag” bag instead. When Marc by Marc was closed, LVMH started to cheapen the MJ accessories: MJ sunglasses, previously made in Italy, were now made in China like the Marc by Marc sunglasses — but at the same MJ prices. The original Marc Jacobs fragrances were discontinued, too, and a steady stream of Daisy flankers have been cranked out. The first Marc Jacobs, the gardenia one, was a well-made perfume with good ingredients; I’m sure it cost much more to produce than those laundry detergent Daisy clones. But, sadly, most Americans have atrocious taste when it comes to perfume.

So yeah, I’d believe MJ is profitable, but you’re absolutely right — it’s not luxury.
 
MJ/MBMJ even in its 00s heyday operated in that 'downtown cool girl version of luxury' niche where you could get clothes for hundreds of dollars and his own-brand bags were It bags selling for four figures but could also also get cute 'in the know' accessories for sub-$200. It had enormous cachet then and no one would have dreamed of putting Marc's labels on par with Coach but obviously, things have changed and while the business side may be healthy, the image of the brand is now mostly associated with Gen Z streetwear bait i.e. no longer luxury.
 

BOF​

LVMH Pledges More Vertical Integration in Response to Dior Manufacturing Scandal​

The luxury giant said it will aim to bring more production in house after an Italian investigation linked Dior to sweatshop conditions.

A craftwoman works on a chest at the Louis Vuitton leather work factory in Juilley, western France.

LVMH is planning to bring more manufacturing in house following a supply chain scandal. (Loic Venance/AFP via Getty Images)

23 July 2024

LVMH will double down on efforts to control working conditions in its supply chain and intensify its strategy of vertical integration in the wake of an Italian investigation that linked Dior to sweatshop labour, chief financial officer Jean-Jacques Guiony said Tuesday.

The luxury giant said it was unaware of the issues in its supply chain, despite ongoing efforts to increase auditing and monitoring of external manufacturers.

”We accept full responsibility for what happened,” Guiony told analysts on a call for the company’s first-half earnings. “We thought we were doing quite a lot already and we will intensify.” In particular, LVMH will look to increase vertical integration at Dior, which outsources more of its production than flagship label Louis Vuitton.

”This strategy didn’t begin yesterday; we’ve been implementing it for quite a while and will continue to do so and hopefully intensify and make it faster than we had in mind,” Guiony said. “That’s not easy to do, but the current situation requires further investment on that front.”

LVMH has faced mounting pressure to address the scandal since it was first swept up in a labour exploitation probe led by prosecutors in Milan. Armani has also faced sanction for failing to adequately monitor its supply chain and actions against more fashion companies are expected to follow in the coming months. Last week, Italy’s Competition Authority said it was conducting its own investigation into whether Dior and Armani misled consumers with commitments to ethics and craftsmanship.

Earlier on Tuesday, Reuters reported that some investors are pushing for LVMH to do more to address the issues.
It always astounds me that high fashion business can be so nasty and cheap!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
211,772
Messages
15,163,506
Members
85,665
Latest member
sidedoll
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->