LVMH - The Luxury Goods Conglomerate | Page 14 | the Fashion Spot
  • Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

LVMH - The Luxury Goods Conglomerate

This question has been raised several times already, but it's worth asking again:
Is it truly feasible to have multiple luxury brands operating in the €15–20 billion annual revenue range without compromising quality, brand image, or exclusivity?
THIS!
It’s impossible. What save those brands is the distribution strategy.

The reality is that public scrutiny has put extreme standards on luxury brands today: they have to cater to more markets, a more diverse clientele (shops don’t buy the same items from collections for example), be innovative, be sustainable, maintain a high quality, provide top services, be ethical…etc.

At a certain point, it’s impossible to not compromise anywhere.
Back then, the customer only wanted a high quality product that lasted long enough and basta. The promise was that you bought an item and you could pass it to your children.

Nobody was interested in the way leather was tanned, treated. Those « sweatshops » in Italy have existed for at least 10 years. I don’t know if it was Chinese but the reality is that those brands have always use subcontractors who were fast enough to respond to a demand in a limited time.

And even with those brands that supposedly at the top of the chain, where are their zippers and hardware produced?

Sometimes when I talk to people, it can almost feel like I’m defending those brands but I think people have to rational. And I think shopping online has also made people loose the perspective on what they are paying.

Yes, those brands makes insane margins on handbags, leather goods and kind of merch RTW (Tshirts, hoodies, jeans, athleisure) but we are not paying the manufacturing cost.

I think what saves a house like Hermes is the fact that they have 3/4 flagship bags. People go to Hermes for a Birkin, a Kelly, a Constance and at best a Haut à Courroies. In terms of shoes, they have the Oran sandals. In terms of offer, they have a fairly more limited one even if the range of products is huge.
Vuitton with Ghesquiere did that. They scaled back a lot in terms of bags in the catalogue.


And I would say that the problem today is that we place everything at the same level too. In essence, Chanel and Dior are different from Vuitton, Gucci and Hermes. And even between them, Hermes is closer to Fendi than Vuitton.
Artisanat wasn’t even Vuitton’s selling point before Arnault took over.
Now everything is luxury. It has become a « one word fits all » word.
 
This question has been raised several times already, but it's worth asking again:
Is it truly feasible to have multiple luxury brands operating in the €15–20 billion annual revenue range without compromising quality, brand image, or exclusivity?

At that scale, brands inevitably have to cater to the broader market. This usually means having a well-oiled beauty/ fragrance business, alongside a wide array of entry-level priced products.
Even Chanel and to a lesser extent Hermès are struggling with this, even though their foundations are more solid compared to Dior or Vuitton.
LVMH has begun a ‘reset’ at Dior, and I expect changes are underway at Vuitton as well — though they’re decidedly late in doing so. Givenchy still seems to be going nowhere; Fendi remains a big question mark; Celine has adopted a renewed but yet unproven strategy; and Loro Piana is now under scrutiny. It’s all very much in flux.
LVMH has not been completely blind to ‘niche’ brands, acquiring minority or majority stakes in companies such as Our Legacy, Kapital, Ganni, A.P.C., and Aimé Leon Dore. However, I don’t think these investments will make a significant difference for the group.

The rise of social media and influencer marketing has massively amplified the visibility (and profitability) of megabrands. But there are growing signs that this exposure can become a liability.
Videos highlighting quality issues with leather goods, for example, can be very damaging to a brand's long-term reputation. Or the trend of people publicly documenting their Hermès spending journeys to obtain a Birkin are so cringe-inducing—and most importantly, completely outside the brand’s control.
Once people are completely put off by a brand’s image, it becomes very difficult to win them back without any radical changes.
lets not forget in 2024 LVMH, through its private equity firm L Catterton, has acquired a minority stake in the French leather goods brand Polène. This move signifies LVMH's interest in the rising brand, known for its minimalist designs and quality craftsmanship. While LVMH now holds a stake, Polène retains its independence and will continue to operate as a separate entity.

so they know a shift is at play
 
subcontractors in italy been around for much longer 20-30 years also kenzo and dior suits made in eastern europe you have youtube investigation documentary dating back as late 90´s on LVMH using this practice ..even till today for Louis Vuitton has a factory in Romania focused on leather goods, for part (but they do also fully finished bags and shoes it came out that get made in italy or france stamp at the end )

Prato's long history in textiles and fashion, along with the influx of Chinese businesses in the mid 1990s
, has shaped its current role as a manufacturing center.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/04/16/the-chinese-workers-who-assemble-designer-bags-in-tuscany
 
So LVMH is trying to sell Marc Jacobs for a price of $ 1 billion (originally reported by the WSJ)
"Sources said the luxury powerhouse is in talks with licensing specialists Authentic, WHP and Bluestar."

For context: Prada paid $1.375 billion for Versace earlier this year....I wonder who will pay that one billion dollar price for the MJ business...and the future of Marc Jacobs is apparently a complete licensing brand.
 
So LVMH is trying to sell Marc Jacobs for a price of $ 1 billion (originally reported by the WSJ)
"Sources said the luxury powerhouse is in talks with licensing specialists Authentic, WHP and Bluestar."

For context: Prada paid $1.375 billion for Versace earlier this year....I wonder who will pay that one billion dollar price for the MJ business...and the future of Marc Jacobs is apparently a complete licensing brand.
its crazy i feel versace should be worth more
 
subcontractors in italy been around for much longer 20-30 years also kenzo and dior suits made in eastern europe you have youtube investigation documentary dating back as late 90´s on LVMH using this practice ..even till today for Louis Vuitton has a factory in Romania focused on leather goods, for part (but they do also fully finished bags and shoes it came out that get made in italy or france stamp at the end )

Prato's long history in textiles and fashion, along with the influx of Chinese businesses in the mid 1990s, has shaped its current role as a manufacturing center.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/04/16/the-chinese-workers-who-assemble-designer-bags-in-tuscany
So there was this June 2025 Le Monde article about organised crimes, rackets, counterfeit, intimidation, arson, death threats, actual murders in Prato, because Chinese and Italian mobs obviously followed (or preceded ?) this influx of Chinese businesses. No brands are named in the article and LVMH is not mentionned. The Loro Piana case happened near Milan.

It is to the point that some current town councillors have been arrested for corruption (duh) and the town in under administrative and judicial administration.
I can't find the English version by Le Monde but let me know if your browser doesn't translate.
A little bit more information about the sweatshops and modern slavery there:

En Toscane, la « guerre des cintres » de la mafia chinoise dans le plus grand pôle textile d’Europe

FR : « A Prato, la réalité du travail pour les ouvriers migrants, c’est douze ou treize heures par jour, sept jours sur sept, trois cent soixante-cinq jours par an, soit un système moyenâgeux, digne de l’esclavage », constate Riccardo Tamborrino, responsable du syndicat SUDD Cobas, engagé dans la défense des ouvriers du textile. « Le système ressemble aujourd’hui à celui d’un point de deal, mais avec des vêtements au lieu de la drogue », poursuit-il, concédant qu’il peine à mobiliser les ouvriers chinois, dont beaucoup sont à la merci de leurs employeurs, qui détiennent leurs papiers d’identité et les contraignent à dormir dans les ateliers. Une enquête récente témoigne du contrôle total exercé sur eux : des couturiers étaient forcés de travailler avec une minicaméra sur la tête, afin que leur productivité puisse être suivie en direct, à distance"

EN : “In Prato, the reality of work for migrant workers is twelve or thirteen hours a day, seven days a week, three hundred and sixty-five days a year, which is a medieval system, worthy of slavery,” says Riccardo Tamborrino, head of the SUDD Cobas union, which is committed to defending textile workers. “The system today resembles that of a drug dealing spot, but with clothes instead of drugs,” he continues, admitting that he struggles to mobilize Chinese workers, many of whom are at the mercy of their employers, who hold their identity papers and force them to sleep in the workshops. A recent investigation reveals the total control exercised over them: seamstresses were forced to work with a mini camera on their heads so that their productivity could be monitored live, remotely.

The bold is from me, it makes me sick and furious, I just don't know what to do, except boycott, but which ones to boycott ? do I have to visit the factory myself every time ? should I demand to facetime the people who made my shirts ?
Should I boycott all the "made in italy" and switch to made in France/Japan only ? any thing by LVMH, Kering, Prada ? give up on fashion and source all my clothes from the tailors across my street.

But Prato is essentially a manufacturing and leather hub: what about the fabrics manufacturing, the raw materials, how many pesticides and toxic dyes for my cotton ?
 
its crazy i feel versace should be worth more
I thought the same. Valentino us valued at €5.4b, despite only making a few 100m more than Versace. On top of that, Versace has much more cultural capital than Valentino ever had.
 
The bold is from me, it makes me sick and furious, I just don't know what to do, except boycott, but which ones to boycott ? do I have to visit the factory myself every time ? should I demand to facetime the people who made my shirts ?
Should I boycott all the "made in italy" and switch to made in France/Japan only ? any thing by LVMH, Kering, Prada ? give up on fashion and source all my clothes from the tailors across my street.

But Prato is essentially a manufacturing and leather hub: what about the fabrics manufacturing, the raw materials, how many pesticides and toxic dyes for my cotton ?
I second your thoughts, its the absolute boom and acceleration to meet all the demands of how these labels became mega-brands in the last 10-15 years. Fashion became pop as they say.
I can only imagine the daily prejudice and lower class stereotype of them in Prato (can't even begin with the casual racism in Italy, even in Milan...). I was reading an article in FT 2 weeks ago of uncovering mass corruption of fast-track acceleration of new-builds in Milan's Porta Nuova area through both the building process and corrupt officials. I find it more excessive in Italy than in France.
Alexander Wang was found in 2012 to have been using Chinese sweatshops in NY to produce pieces. Maybe 15 years ago a very high prestige mega-brand 'saved' 2 embroidery companies from closure but the majority of the production is done by Chinese ethnic workers outside of Paris (though no excessive or toxic bullying allegations, more that they have a have a higher turnover - fast, disciplined and precise handwork and don't complain as much).

I am buying mostly second hand designer (other than superior fabrics its also fun to discover and hunt some older iconic collection pieces), though I still like some current fashion.
It's also interesting because an example like Phoebe's DTC model is small scale, very tight production, all pieces are very rigorously developed, the model is based on real consumption data and trying to have as little leftover stock as possible to reflect her ethics but the working conditions for her team are beyond toxic (from design team, interns working round the clock, to wholesale/digital).
 
I wonder though how much this actually hurts their sales. Maybe I am too cynical but I just don't think people shopping at Dior or LP care at all about humanitarian standards. I only know one person who goes into deep dives on brands and their production processes and that is my cousin lol and even then she still buy what she buys.
i think it will hurt their sales. there is a big subset of pragmatic aspirational consumers that will think they should just buy a cashmere sweater from saks, aritzia or uniqlo (whatever their bracket is) instead of saving up for LP because they're being made the same way.

i also honestly think that a significant number of their clientele will be turned off by the workers being chinese. if it were a sweatshop staffed by italians or other europeans, i don't think it would be as much of an issue but sinophobia is alive and well.

Does someone know how this affects younger audiences?

The fashionable teens and early 20s I know aspire/buy to contemporary brands (more so if niche) when only a few years ago they’d die to shop in Dior/Prada/Celine.
this is exactly what i mean. wearing logos these days is less of an advertisement of wealth and more of an advertisement of being a sucker or uninformed.
 
this is exactly what i mean. wearing logos these days is less of an advertisement of wealth and more of an advertisement of being a sucker or uninformed.
I mean it’s dire when even a friend I know who used to work for an LVMH brand and loves designer brands feels high and mighty after “discovering” underground Vietnamese streetwear.

Performative or not, social consciousness is now a status symbol among kids I know—who should’ve been the LVMH customer few years from now.

When sheer exclusivity (especially in this economic climate) is the raison d’être of these brands, more so that those who peddle supposed quality has been exposed, the market will react.

After all, most of the market that drove these brands to the big leagues weren’t really there for craftsmanship.
 
When sheer exclusivity (especially in this economic climate) is the raison d’être of these brands, more so that those who peddle supposed quality has been exposed, the market will react.
I think too many brands are trying to be all things to too many audiences.

Visible enough to be aspirational, expensive enough to be exclusive, with merchandised junk to sell, identifiable to telegraph a brand identity (in a cheap way since most brands don't have reliable house codes anymore), with invite-only secret luxury perks for VVIPs that are glamorous enough to show off on social media, made cheaply enough for unsustainable growth, and a veneer of social consciousness that ultimately doesn't mean anything. And I can't think of a single major fashion house with product that's good enough to keep the facades from falling.
 

PUCK.NEWS​

The Fréd Balloon​

As Frédéric Arnault tries to figure out a new story for Loro Piana in a post-‘Succession’ world, Giorgia Meloni’s crackdown on factory working conditions threatens to shed light on what that $3,000 “quiet luxury” cashmere sweater actually costs to make. Is this gig now one of the Herculean labors required to one day win the big job?
Inner Circle Exclusive

Frédéric Arnault

Loro Piana, for its part, was growing in a market where very few brands were succeeding, and it seemed as though Frédéric had been set up for success by his predecessor. Photo: Kym Illman/Getty Images
August 7, 2025
Earlier this week, as out-of-office emails were being composed across Europe, about 1,000 of Gucci’s retail and logistics employees declared something of a protest against their employer. The workers, represented by three Italian trade unions, claimed that they had not received the welfare payments promised to them. Will they actually go on strike? (A rep for Kering, the owner of Gucci, didn’t respond to a request for comment on this one.)
Italy’s union membership is relatively high—about a third of all workers—but labor has less bargaining leverage in the country since the employment rate is so low (62.9 percent, compared to the OECD average of 70.4 percent). And yet, as most of the country’s actually employed embark on their requisite August holiday, it’s a reminder that Italy remains a hotbed for these sorts of headaches.
Just a few weeks ago, for instance, LVMH-owned Loro Piana had its own labor issues. The entity was placed under court monitoring for the next year due to allegedly substandard worker conditions at one of its subcontractor’s subcontracted facilities. (That’s right, a subcontractor’s subcontractor.) This is the fifth investigation into the working conditions at a factory connected to a luxury brand since the Italian government started dredging this stuff up around 2023: Valentino, Armani, and fellow LVMH brand Dior have also passed through court monitoring.
Unsurprisingly, there is a political undercurrent here. MAGA-adjacent far-right prime minister Giorgia Meloni has introduced her own populist agenda for the country—one that favors workers over conglomerates (to an extent) and endeavors to make Italy, a regional economic player, great again. Meloni “sees a power vacuum Italy can fill as economic leaders in the European Union, and they know this kind of stuff won’t fly and don’t want to be caught sitting on their hands,” as one person who works in the Italian manufacturing system put it. Meloni and her disciples are “really clued into optics” of claims of poor working conditions, as this person put it, and “they’re really trying to get in front of any criticism while still making sure Italian-made brands are the best brands.”
But how bad are the optics, exactly? It doesn’t help luxury brands that the press, even outlets that shy away from covering them critically, feel empowered to report on labor issues—it’s about human rights, after all. Criticizing a company’s business strategy or runway show may be off-limits to more pliant outlets, but dirty factory toilets are fair game. As I wrote when the Loro Piana news first broke, I’m not convinced this will impact overall sales or brand perception, even in the short term, at least not everywhere. This isn’t a Foxconn situation—which, by the way, didn’t really have any lasting drag on any Apple products.
In the West, consumers are generally desensitized to this sort of unpleasant news, especially in America. In other parts of the world, however, consumers exercise a different range of moral judgement. In China, Dolce & Gabbana’s sales were directly affected by their advertising scandal in 2018—and arguably never fully recovered—while women elsewhere continued buying their collectible, incredibly well-fitting dresses. (It certainly didn’t stop Lauren Sánchez from loving up the brand.) In Korea, the Italian court’s investigation of Dior’s factory dampened sales in an already challenging environment, exposing the fact that the margins on this stuff are wide—meaning, the cost of raw materials and labor isn’t very high, at least compared to the final price. (Perhaps that helps to explain why Dior C.E.O. Delphine Arnault and creative director Jonathan Anderson used “quality” as a major talking point upon his debut.)
Anyway, perhaps the most significant downstream impact of this micro-scandal is that it may add a new wrinkle to the Arnault family succession kremlinology. In June, after all, Frédéric Arnault ascended to C.E.O. of Loro Piana, one of LVMH’s fastest-growing brands, if not the fastest-growing. At the time, it was an open question whether LVMH C.E.O. Bernard Arnault, whose shareholders recently gave him the green light to rule the company for another decade, had given his 29-year-old son this plum assignment because it was the best job, or the easiest. In other words, was this a light-touch act of favoritism to burnish his credentials? Indeed, his siblings appeared to be toiling away in other, more challenged parts of the empire: Delphine is turning around Dior; Alexandre is turning around Moët Hennessy; and Antoine, as head of communications and image (and chairman of Loro Piana) has to deal with all of it.
Loro Piana, for its part, was growing in a market where very few brands were succeeding, and it seemed as though Frédéric had been set up for success by his predecessor—the incredibly well-regarded (especially for LVMH) Damien Bertrand, who was shipped over to (actual) behemoth Louis Vuitton, where he is presumably being groomed to someday take over for Pietro Beccari as C.E.O. But was it also possible that Arnault had actually entrusted his young son with the responsibility of cleaning up this mess?
The real challenge isn’t so much the bad press around the factories, but rather how luxury consumers respond to new information about what “quiet luxury” actually costs to produce. As one former LVMH executive suggested, “Most customers won’t be sufficiently moved by the labor issues. They most certainly will take offense at paying $3,000 for a cashmere sweater that is known to cost the company only $100. Bottom line: Wealthy folks—especially those who consider themselves discerning enough to spend $3,000 on a sweater—don’t like to feel duped.” Anyway, it’ll be up to Frédéric to pick up the pieces.

The Preppy Lookbook​

There isn’t any one person who is obviously at fault here. Sure, there’s a consensus within LVMH that you could blame Bertrand, but ultimately it was a subcontractor’s subcontractor—the latest reminder, in case the Arnaults needed it, that their teams have to have eyes on everything, even issues that are nearly impossible to manage directly at superscale. The solution may be further vertical integration, but a brand like Loro Piana can’t really eradicate the need for subcontractors in Italy. In reality, this is really just the price of doing business for a company of LVMH’s size.
But being duped means different things to different people. Many of those consumers who are buying Quince blankets for their Hamptons parties will still purchase Loro Piana polos in bulk. And while muted wardrobes might go the way of the pandemic, the clean, preppy look—a way of being for many—is still very much on trend. Loro Piana is set up to accommodate its look: Preppy codes are interchangeable with many quiet-luxury codes. Its merchandisers simply need to dust off the colors a bit, market the chino program, and remind consumers—via events, advertising, and product mix—than nothing goes better with a pair of deck shoes than an Italian cashmere sweater.
In the coming months, Frédéric will need a new story for the brand, not just new policies, to shape what Loro Piana represents in a post-Succession world. Perhaps he’ll hire some name-brand designers for the individual categories, similar to Hermès. Or maybe he’ll launch a new campaign—full-fledged or whisper—underscoring the quality of the brand’s goods.
He also may eventually want a new story to tell about himself, too. As Arnault’s second-youngest son, and the only one in the family with a prized degree from École Polytechnique, his father’s alma mater, Frédéric might be able to leverage a successful clean-up as the latest evidence that he is the heir apparent after all—especially as his father’s latest retirement moratoriums seem to dim his older step-siblings’ chances.
The good news is, Loro Piana is performing so well that B.A. directed Bertrand to control growth, hence the limited availability of its best-selling style, the Summer Walk loafer. So he always has that to fall back on. Everyone loves a revival. At least in theory.
 

PUCK.NEWS​

The Fréd Balloon​

As Frédéric Arnault tries to figure out a new story for Loro Piana in a post-‘Succession’ world, Giorgia Meloni’s crackdown on factory working conditions threatens to shed light on what that $3,000 “quiet luxury” cashmere sweater actually costs to make. Is this gig now one of the Herculean labors required to one day win the big job?
Inner Circle Exclusive

Frédéric Arnault

Loro Piana, for its part, was growing in a market where very few brands were succeeding, and it seemed as though Frédéric had been set up for success by his predecessor. Photo: Kym Illman/Getty Images
August 7, 2025
Earlier this week, as out-of-office emails were being composed across Europe, about 1,000 of Gucci’s retail and logistics employees declared something of a protest against their employer. The workers, represented by three Italian trade unions, claimed that they had not received the welfare payments promised to them. Will they actually go on strike? (A rep for Kering, the owner of Gucci, didn’t respond to a request for comment on this one.)
Italy’s union membership is relatively high—about a third of all workers—but labor has less bargaining leverage in the country since the employment rate is so low (62.9 percent, compared to the OECD average of 70.4 percent). And yet, as most of the country’s actually employed embark on their requisite August holiday, it’s a reminder that Italy remains a hotbed for these sorts of headaches.
Just a few weeks ago, for instance, LVMH-owned Loro Piana had its own labor issues. The entity was placed under court monitoring for the next year due to allegedly substandard worker conditions at one of its subcontractor’s subcontracted facilities. (That’s right, a subcontractor’s subcontractor.) This is the fifth investigation into the working conditions at a factory connected to a luxury brand since the Italian government started dredging this stuff up around 2023: Valentino, Armani, and fellow LVMH brand Dior have also passed through court monitoring.
Unsurprisingly, there is a political undercurrent here. MAGA-adjacent far-right prime minister Giorgia Meloni has introduced her own populist agenda for the country—one that favors workers over conglomerates (to an extent) and endeavors to make Italy, a regional economic player, great again. Meloni “sees a power vacuum Italy can fill as economic leaders in the European Union, and they know this kind of stuff won’t fly and don’t want to be caught sitting on their hands,” as one person who works in the Italian manufacturing system put it. Meloni and her disciples are “really clued into optics” of claims of poor working conditions, as this person put it, and “they’re really trying to get in front of any criticism while still making sure Italian-made brands are the best brands.”
But how bad are the optics, exactly? It doesn’t help luxury brands that the press, even outlets that shy away from covering them critically, feel empowered to report on labor issues—it’s about human rights, after all. Criticizing a company’s business strategy or runway show may be off-limits to more pliant outlets, but dirty factory toilets are fair game. As I wrote when the Loro Piana news first broke, I’m not convinced this will impact overall sales or brand perception, even in the short term, at least not everywhere. This isn’t a Foxconn situation—which, by the way, didn’t really have any lasting drag on any Apple products.
In the West, consumers are generally desensitized to this sort of unpleasant news, especially in America. In other parts of the world, however, consumers exercise a different range of moral judgement. In China, Dolce & Gabbana’s sales were directly affected by their advertising scandal in 2018—and arguably never fully recovered—while women elsewhere continued buying their collectible, incredibly well-fitting dresses. (It certainly didn’t stop Lauren Sánchez from loving up the brand.) In Korea, the Italian court’s investigation of Dior’s factory dampened sales in an already challenging environment, exposing the fact that the margins on this stuff are wide—meaning, the cost of raw materials and labor isn’t very high, at least compared to the final price. (Perhaps that helps to explain why Dior C.E.O. Delphine Arnault and creative director Jonathan Anderson used “quality” as a major talking point upon his debut.)
Anyway, perhaps the most significant downstream impact of this micro-scandal is that it may add a new wrinkle to the Arnault family succession kremlinology. In June, after all, Frédéric Arnault ascended to C.E.O. of Loro Piana, one of LVMH’s fastest-growing brands, if not the fastest-growing. At the time, it was an open question whether LVMH C.E.O. Bernard Arnault, whose shareholders recently gave him the green light to rule the company for another decade, had given his 29-year-old son this plum assignment because it was the best job, or the easiest. In other words, was this a light-touch act of favoritism to burnish his credentials? Indeed, his siblings appeared to be toiling away in other, more challenged parts of the empire: Delphine is turning around Dior; Alexandre is turning around Moët Hennessy; and Antoine, as head of communications and image (and chairman of Loro Piana) has to deal with all of it.
Loro Piana, for its part, was growing in a market where very few brands were succeeding, and it seemed as though Frédéric had been set up for success by his predecessor—the incredibly well-regarded (especially for LVMH) Damien Bertrand, who was shipped over to (actual) behemoth Louis Vuitton, where he is presumably being groomed to someday take over for Pietro Beccari as C.E.O. But was it also possible that Arnault had actually entrusted his young son with the responsibility of cleaning up this mess?
The real challenge isn’t so much the bad press around the factories, but rather how luxury consumers respond to new information about what “quiet luxury” actually costs to produce. As one former LVMH executive suggested, “Most customers won’t be sufficiently moved by the labor issues. They most certainly will take offense at paying $3,000 for a cashmere sweater that is known to cost the company only $100. Bottom line: Wealthy folks—especially those who consider themselves discerning enough to spend $3,000 on a sweater—don’t like to feel duped.” Anyway, it’ll be up to Frédéric to pick up the pieces.

The Preppy Lookbook​

There isn’t any one person who is obviously at fault here. Sure, there’s a consensus within LVMH that you could blame Bertrand, but ultimately it was a subcontractor’s subcontractor—the latest reminder, in case the Arnaults needed it, that their teams have to have eyes on everything, even issues that are nearly impossible to manage directly at superscale. The solution may be further vertical integration, but a brand like Loro Piana can’t really eradicate the need for subcontractors in Italy. In reality, this is really just the price of doing business for a company of LVMH’s size.
But being duped means different things to different people. Many of those consumers who are buying Quince blankets for their Hamptons parties will still purchase Loro Piana polos in bulk. And while muted wardrobes might go the way of the pandemic, the clean, preppy look—a way of being for many—is still very much on trend. Loro Piana is set up to accommodate its look: Preppy codes are interchangeable with many quiet-luxury codes. Its merchandisers simply need to dust off the colors a bit, market the chino program, and remind consumers—via events, advertising, and product mix—than nothing goes better with a pair of deck shoes than an Italian cashmere sweater.
In the coming months, Frédéric will need a new story for the brand, not just new policies, to shape what Loro Piana represents in a post-Succession world. Perhaps he’ll hire some name-brand designers for the individual categories, similar to Hermès. Or maybe he’ll launch a new campaign—full-fledged or whisper—underscoring the quality of the brand’s goods.
He also may eventually want a new story to tell about himself, too. As Arnault’s second-youngest son, and the only one in the family with a prized degree from École Polytechnique, his father’s alma mater, Frédéric might be able to leverage a successful clean-up as the latest evidence that he is the heir apparent after all—especially as his father’s latest retirement moratoriums seem to dim his older step-siblings’ chances.
The good news is, Loro Piana is performing so well that B.A. directed Bertrand to control growth, hence the limited availability of its best-selling style, the Summer Walk loafer. So he always has that to fall back on. Everyone loves a revival. At least in theory.
I love that Lauren couldn’t get right Arnault bro for the photo and called them step-siblings.

Sometimes I read her articles bypassing the paywall and they are all general a whole lot of nothing. I’m surprised she gets paid to do this and that Puck is behind a paywall.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,496
Messages
15,264,156
Members
88,541
Latest member
monteezus
Back
Top