Thanks versustito.
Positive me: They’ve managed to retouch Naomi beautifully here.
Bitchy me: Unfortunate that it’s for a completely uneventful-looking shoot and even cheaper-looking magazine; just basing that impression on the cover, its layout, the beyond-horrendous typefaces that look like it was vomited onto the layout, and the discount styling. I mean, if one has Naomi, and wishes to keep it minimal, why have her looking so Janet Jackson-basic…? I really don’t understand: It’s Naomi, the most graphically-sharp woman in fashiondom— and they just stick her in the most banal of basics???? Have these people never seen how Herb Ritts shoots Naomi? And why is the afro on the cover so much smaller than the one in the edit…?
So much potential wasted.