This is so referential to some of his Dior work, especially the exposed bustier. There's elements I love here, and elements I hate. Overall, I'm left wondering: if he did this at Dior (which in the early years he kind of did), but more high-octane, would it have been applauded or disregarded?
Yes. The seamless, exposed nude bustier is straight from the Fall/Winter 2005 Couture show. The Watteau back on some of the dress reminds me of a look from the Madame Butterfly collection. I also see an exact replica of a Fall/Winter 2002 coat - now done in a reflective silver material.
Had this been shown at Dior? But more high octane? I think it would look better for sure.
I’ve said before many times in Margiela Couture threads here that casting, styling and production make a big difference in the way clothes are perceived.
Throw these same clothes on the models of the Brazilian and Russian era, throw it on the iconic mirrored runway, add in a bombastic soundtrack from Jeremy Healy...and it’s suddenly a different thing. If you’re not going to do that, just do a lookbook or a presentation or museum/exhibit style event...where we can see the clothes and marvel at the details and construction.
Because, in my opinion, these “models” (who uncomfortably sprint down the catwalk) and this cramped, dark, claustrophobic setting do nothing for these clothes at all. In fact - they really bring everything down a notch or two.
These creative choices on how the work is presented is as important as the work itself. All the effort put into making such interesting clothes kind of lost...it’s a shame when other choices could have been made. It’s like a director having a great script on his hands...and then wasting it with poor actors and subpar cinematographers, editors and composers to complete the project. Ends up a bit of a waste.